'guarantees' 검색 결과

Define transaction boundaries, locking, and consistency guarantees for multi-step writes. Use when designing atomic operations, retries, idempotency, or concurrent write behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decode a commercial lease before signing or renewing -- true all-in occupancy cost (base rent plus NNN/CAM plus escalations), the clauses that hurt small tenants (personal guarantees, relocation, restoration), and the negotiation asks landlords routinely grant. The lease is most SMBs' biggest fixed cost and least-read document.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides the post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment process following EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology. Covers destination country surveillance law assessment, European Essential Guarantees evaluation, and supplementary measures determination. Keywords: TIA, transfer impact assessment, Schrems II, EDPB recommendations, supplementary measures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build privacy-preserving data sharing platforms using synthetic data generation with the SDV library, data clean rooms, secure enclaves, and utility measurement. Covers end-to-end architecture for sharing analytical datasets while preserving individual privacy guarantees.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Architecture guide for GDPR-compliant federated learning systems. Covers horizontal and vertical FL, aggregation strategies (FedAvg, FedProx), communication efficiency, secure aggregation, and differential privacy integration. Includes privacy guarantees analysis and deployment patterns for cross-organizational ML without data sharing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract language-agnostic pseudocode from formally verified programs (Isabelle/HOL, Coq) while preserving verified control flow, data dependencies, and algorithmic logic. Use when: (1) Users have verified code and need readable pseudocode, (2) Documenting verified algorithms for broader audiences, (3) Translating verified implementations to other languages, (4) Creating algorithm specifications from verified code, (5) Preserving verification guarantees in pseudocode form, or (6) Abstracting proof-heavy code to essential logic. Maintains semantic faithfulness to verified implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate systematic refinement steps from high-level specifications to concrete implementations in Isabelle/HOL or Coq, preserving correctness obligations at each step. Use when working with formal verification, program refinement, proof development, or when translating abstract specifications into executable code while maintaining formal guarantees. Supports data refinement (abstract types → concrete structures), algorithmic refinement (specifications → algorithms), and stepwise refinement with proof obligations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate executable code together with formal proofs certifying safety and correctness properties in Isabelle/HOL or Coq. Use when building verified software, safety-critical systems, or when formal guarantees are required. Produces code with accompanying proofs for memory safety, bounds checking, functional correctness, invariant preservation, and termination. Supports extraction to OCaml/Haskell/SML and integration with existing codebases.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

An almost defiantly minimal documentation-first system that treats the home page like a Markdown README — paper-white canvas, 36px center-aligned heading, a single black pill CTA, an inline terminal install snippet, and a hand-drawn llama mascot as the only ornamental element. No gradient, no hero photography, no marketing pyrotechnics. The chrome is a tiny utility palette of pure black, pure white, and three neutral grays; every interactive element is fully rounded into a pill (`{rounded.full}`); typography is SF Pro Rounded for headings paired with system sans for body and ui-monospace for code. Pricing tiers, FAQs, and "your data stays yours" guarantees all sit on the same flat canvas inside thin-border cards — the system is the documentation, and the documentation is the system.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Construct a high-conversion offer using Alex Hormozi's value equation and Grand Slam Offer mechanics during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to design the offer, set up the pitch, build bonuses or guarantees, or when user asks "how do we package this?", "what's the offer?", "build a grand slam offer", "Hormozi", "$100M offers", "guarantee", "bonus stack". Outputs GTM-* entries with Type=Offer / Type=Guarantee and BR-PRICING-* updates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Suede-owned pricing and packaging discipline. Use when deciding what to charge, structuring tiers, choosing a value metric, comparing free trials with freemium, researching willingness to pay, planning a price increase, or tearing down a pricing page for clarity and AI-readability. NOT FOR: in-product upgrade screens (use suede-paywalls), offer bonuses and guarantees (use suede-offers), or executing billing changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Suede-affiliated offer design for value framing, bonuses, guarantees, risk reversal, honest scarcity, naming, and payment structure. Use when the user is building or diagnosing a service, course, coaching, information-product, agency, or high-ticket B2B offer. NOT FOR: SaaS tier and value-metric architecture (use suede-pricing), sales-page copy (use suede-copy), or in-product upgrade prompts (use suede-paywalls).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Execute a quick task with GSD guarantees (atomic commits, state tracking) but skip optional agents

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

World Extractable Value via Aptos orderless transactions with Strong Parallelism Invariance (SPI) guarantees and GF(3) conservation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Dynamically discover and load ACSet reference skills in dependency-optimal order using GitHub interactome analysis. Use when loading the acsets skill and needing its validation, generation, and coordination partners resolved automatically with GF(3) conservation guarantees.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates cornerstone investment commitments with allocation guarantees, lock-up terms, and signaling value assessment. Use when structuring cornerstone tranches, analyzing anchor investors, or evaluating demand signals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Selects the active profile from triggering context. Evaluates a rule set against inputs (current time, calendar state, geofence, manual command, custom signals) and returns the profile name that consuming Skills (handoff-trigger-check, critic-gate, future Skills) should apply. Configuration-driven; rule set lives in a router config file conforming to the included schema. Deterministic precedence — manual override beats calendar beats time-window beats default. Required default profile guarantees a routing decision always exists. Use when an orchestrator needs to pick a profile automatically rather than having the caller specify one, when wiring calendar/time/Telegram triggers to gate behavior, or when a Skill's behavior should change with availability mode. Trigger on: "what profile should I use," "route to a profile," "which mode am I in," "auto-select profile," "active mode," "current profile." Do NOT use to evaluate work readiness or review proposed changes. Always returns a profile name.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when C or C++ code needs memory-safety or undefined-behavior guarantees proved with CBMC, or ACSL contracts checked with Frama-C Eva or WP. Not for choosing the proof policy: use proof-driven.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Fires after fixing any non-trivial bug or regression. Asks: could the graph have caught this as a guarantee? Pairs with reflection-in-and-on-action — picks up after "earliest catchable signal" and asks the next question: was that signal expressible in graph? Triggers: (1) after any non-trivial bug fix is verified working, (2) after a regression report (something used to work, broke), (3) during step 6 (knowledge extraction) of the workflow, (4) when reflection-on-action surfaces a "would have been catchable" signal. Outcome is a triage decision (graph-reachable? rule expressible? rule sound?) and either a draft Linear issue + guarantee proposal, or a recorded "graph capability gap" note. Never auto-creates guarantees.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see emails. For popup copy, see popups. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing. For the offer underneath the copy (bonuses, guarantees, value framing), see offers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decompose an approved spec into a dependency-ordered swarm plan — one task per component, each with an explicit write_set. Produces `.claude/state/swarm/<slug>.json` with tasks + waves. The wave scheduler guarantees pairwise-disjoint write_sets within each wave so parallel dispatch is provably conflict-free.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Load this skill whenever the project contains dynamic content updates, status messages, alerts, notifications, loading indicators, or any use of aria-live, role="status", role="alert", or role="log". Under no circumstances add or modify live-region markup without applying these rules. Prioritize correct politeness levels and avoid redundant announcements. Never use a fixed-delay clear-and-reinsert workaround — no standard guarantees it works.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Formally verify programs by writing Lean 4 proofs. Trigger this skill whenever the user wants to formally verify code, generate Lean 4 proofs, prove properties about algorithms or smart contracts, verify invariants, convert program logic into formal specifications, or anything involving Lean 4 and formal verification. Also trigger when the user mentions "qedgen", "lean proof", "formal proof", "verify my code", "prove correctness", "formal verification", or wants mathematical guarantees about their implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Why expensive, wasteful, effortful, or self-deprecating actions build trust and desire — Rory Sutherland on signalling. Use when the problem is credibility or desirability rather than meaning: the user asks 'why don't people trust us', 'how do we look more credible/committed/premium', 'is our guarantee/warranty worth it', 'should we spend on brand advertising', 'how do we justify a higher price', or wonders why a cheaper-looking competitor wins. Covers costly signals (advertising spend, guarantees, over-delivery), price-as-quality-signal (Veblen goods), and the Pratfall Effect (admitting a real flaw to gain trust). Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「信頼されない」「安心してもらえない」「強気な価格で売りたい」「広告費に意味はある？」）にも使う。中文咨询（“不被信任”“想以高价出售”“广告费有意义吗？”）也适用。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.