'mapping' 검색 결과

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Quarkus applications — including @acceptance scenarios, @QuarkusTest, BaseAcceptanceTest with QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager for Testcontainers and WireMock, REST Assured for full HTTP pipeline testing, WireMock JSON mapping files (classpath:wiremock/mappings/), *AT suffix naming, and Maven Surefire/Failsafe three-tier split. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Quarkus acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Quarkus; Create WireMock JSON mapping files for external HTTP stubs in Quarkus acceptance tests; Configure Maven *AT naming convention and Failsafe plugin for Quarkus acceptance tests; Map sanitized Gherkin scenario facts to Quarkus acceptance tests. Part of Plinth Toolkit

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides conducting privacy law gap analysis for market entry into new jurisdictions. Covers target jurisdiction assessment, existing compliance mapping, remediation effort estimation, and implementation timeline planning. Keywords: gap analysis, market entry, jurisdiction assessment, remediation planning, compliance mapping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conducts comprehensive inventory of protected health information across the enterprise per HIPAA Security Rule requirements at 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) and §164.310(d). Covers identification of all ePHI repositories, data flow mapping, classification of PHI by sensitivity, and integration with risk analysis. Keywords: PHI inventory, ePHI, data mapping, information asset, data flow, HIPAA risk analysis, designated record set.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implements data lineage tracking for privacy compliance including origin tracking, transformation logging, access auditing, deletion verification, and cross-system lineage graphs. Covers source-to-sink mapping, GDPR Art. 30 RoPA integration, automated lineage discovery, and breach impact scoping. Keywords: data lineage, data provenance, data flow mapping, transformation logging, deletion verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds comprehensive data inventory per GDPR Art. 30 Records of Processing Activities. Covers system-by-system discovery, data flow diagramming, third-party identification, and legal basis per category. Keywords: data inventory, data mapping, Art 30, RoPA, data flow, processing activities.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A high-level conceptual mapping from Active Directory attack techniques to the compliance controls they touch. Kerberoasting relates to authentication and logging, so it brushes ENS op.acc.5 / op.exp.8, NIS2 Art.21(2)(h), DORA RTS Art.9 / Art.21. Use this when a reader wants to understand which regulatory control an AD finding relates to, or to add an orientation note to a technical finding. This is a conceptual, orientative mapping only; it is NOT an auditor-defensible, curated, ID-by-ID control matrix. Covers ENS (op.acc.*, op.exp.*), NIS2 (Directive 2022/2555 Art.21), and DORA (RTS 2024/1774).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

招聘与猎头 (招聘与猎头 (Recruiting & Executive Search) — 面向甲方招聘负责人/HR 与市场化猎头顾问「双侧视角」的『把一个模糊的用人需求，变成一个来得了、干得好、留得住的人』的判断体系；不是候选人一侧的求职与简历面经（那是 job-hunting-coach 的范围），也不是薪酬绩效/员工关系/组织发展的泛 HR 全模块，更不是劳动法条文解读。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行的核心世界观分歧：**需求诊断优先 ⇄ 快速供给优先**（用人经理提来的岗位需求几乎总是一张愿望清单，资深招聘先开 intake 会把『必须有』与『最好有』拆开、把画像逼成可证伪的成功标准；但按成单计酬的猎头把诊断时间压不进单价里，于是行业里同时存在『先诊断再搜寻』和『先扔简历再说』两种作业习惯）；**结构化面试 ⇄ 看人的直觉**（工业与组织心理学近一个世纪的效度元分析一致指向：结构化面试、工作样本、认知能力测验的预测效度明显高于非结构化面谈与经验年限，但一线用人经理绝大多数仍相信自己聊两句就能看准人——这是本行最大的知行落差，也是所有循证招聘流派的出发点；顺带一提，业内长期奉为圭臬的 Schmidt-Hunter 效度排序近年被重新校正，工作样本的效度被下调，这场修正本身就是本行必须如实呈现的争议）；**能力素质 ⇄ 文化匹配**（culture fit 既是最常被写在拒信里的理由，也是被批评得最凶的偏见外壳，Google 一派主张改口叫 culture add，看的是这个人补上了团队缺的东西，而不是像不像我们）；**主动寻访 sourcing ⇄ 被动投递漏斗**（高端与稀缺技能岗只有 outbound 人才地图一条路；量大岗位靠渠道效率、转化率与自动化，两条路的技能树几乎不重叠）；**人才地图是资产 ⇄ 人才地图是浪费**（保留制猎头把 mapping 当交付物的一部分，成功付费猎头认为地图做完单子已经黄了）；**保留制 retained ⇄ 成功付费 contingency**（按阶段预付、独家、深度地图 vs 多家赛马、入职才收钱、速度压倒深度；两种商业模式塑造出两种截然不同的作业节奏、候选人对待方式与职业道德边界，比如 off-limits 不挖回自己安置过的人）；**内部招聘团队 ⇄ 外部猎头与 RPO**（成本、速度、知识沉淀、雇主品牌归属谁的长期争论；embedded recruiter 是近年的折中）；**候选人体验 ⇄ 筛选效率**（漏斗越严体验越差，被拒者也是客户与口碑）；**AI 筛选的效率 ⇄ 合规与偏见**（简历解析、AI 面试评分、自动排序已在大规模使用，同时被监管盯上：纽约市 Local Law 144 要求自动化决策工具做偏见审计并公示、欧盟 AI 法案把招聘划为高风险场景、伊利诺伊州对 AI 视频面试单独立法；业内既离不开它，也在诉讼与审计里学做记录）；**offer 谈判的锚定 ⇄ 薪酬透明**（多地薪酬区间披露立法把谈判起点从『你现在多少』改成『这个岗位值多少』，问薪酬历史在不少法域已被禁止）；**counter-offer 该不该接**（猎头几乎一致反对，认为留下来的人多数一年内还是会走，但这条业内定论的证据基础本身也在被质疑）；**入职后早期流失算谁的**（保证期与退款条款把这场争论直接写进了合同）。(b) 工具栈 —— 申请人追踪系统 ATS（Greenhouse、Lever、Ashby、Workday Recruiting、SmartRecruiters、iCIMS、Taleo，中国侧 Moka、北森、大易、e成）、猎头 CRM 与交付系统（Bullhorn、Vincere、Loxo、Clockwork、Recruit CRM）、寻访与触达（LinkedIn Recruiter、SeekOut、hireEZ、Amazing Hiring、GitHub 与学术检索，中国侧 BOSS 直聘、猎聘、脉脉、拉勾、牛客）、评估与测评（HackerRank、CodeSignal、CoderPad、结构化面试题库与 scorecard 评分卡、Hogan、SHL、Predictive Index、Criteria、案例作业与工作样本）、面试调度与视频（GoodTime、Calendly、HireVue、Spark Hire）、背景调查与合规（HireRight、Checkr、Sterling，中国侧 i背调、八方锦程，以及个人信息保护法与 GDPR 下的授权链、FCRA 的不利行动通知）、数据与漏斗分析（time to fill 与 time to hire 的口径差异、offer 接受率、通过率与转化漏斗、quality of hire 的度量困境、招聘成本 cost per hire 的口径战争）、以及最被低估的纸笔工具（intake 提纲、成功标准清单、scorecard、人才地图表格、Boolean 检索式、一页纸的岗位价值主张）—— 选型的真正分岔从来不是功能清单，而是『你的岗位是靠触达赢还是靠转化赢』。(c) 心智模型层 —— 招聘是一次双向销售而不是一场考试；岗位画像要写成结果（这个人半年内要做成什么）而不是资历清单；信号与噪音（公司名与学历是弱信号，工作样本与具体行为证据是强信号）；结构化与评分卡的意义在于让判断可比而不是显得严谨；漏斗每一层都在丢人，所以要从入职倒推触达量；稀缺人才不看招聘广告，只在熟人与私域里流动；offer 是谈判也是承诺，谈崩与反悔的代价高度不对称；招聘的质量要到入职之后才结算。(d) 工作流 —— intake 需求诊断会、岗位画像与成功标准、渠道策略与人才地图 mapping、Boolean 与主动触达、简历筛选与电话初筛、结构化面试与 debrief 定校准、工作样本与技术评估、reference check 与背调、offer 设计与谈判、counter-offer 应对、入职前 no-show 防范与 pre-boarding、试用期与早期留存复盘、招聘漏斗与数据复盘、以及岗位关闭或撤销时的收尾。(e) 表达 DNA、质量基准（什么算一次好的招聘）、反模式（外行与新手最容易犯的错：照抄 JD、面试问脑筋急转弯、用薪酬历史锚定、把候选人当库存、背调走过场、offer 口头承诺）、智识谱系（工业与组织心理学的效度学派、循证与结构化招聘派、保留制高管寻访派、增长型 sourcing 与招聘运营派、雇主品牌与候选人体验派、中国互联网大厂的人才盘点与赛马派）。) Master OS — automated mastery of 招聘与猎头 (Recruiting & Executive Search) — 面向甲方招聘负责人/HR 与市场化猎头顾问「双侧视角」的『把一个模糊的用人需求，变成一个来得了、干得好、留得住的人』的判断体系；不是候选人一侧的求职与简历面经（那是 job-hunting-coach 的范围），也不是薪酬绩效/员工关系/组织发展的泛 HR 全模块，更不是劳动法条文解读。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行的核心世界观分歧：**需求诊断优先 ⇄ 快速供给优先**（用人经理提来的岗位需求几乎总是一张愿望清单，资深招聘先开 intake 会把『必须有』与『最好有』拆开、把画像逼成可证伪的成功标准；但按成单计酬的猎头把诊断时间压不进单价里，于是行业里同时存在『先诊断再搜寻』和『先扔简历再说』两种作业习惯）；**结构化面试 ⇄ 看人的直觉**（工业与组织心理学近一个世纪的效度元分析一致指向：结构化面试、工作样本、认知能力测验的预测效度明显高于非结构化面谈与经验年限，但一线用人经理绝大多数仍相信自己聊两句就能看准人——这是本行最大的知行落差，也是所有循证招聘流派的出发点；顺带一提，业内长期奉为圭臬的 Schmidt-Hunter 效度排序近年被重新校正，工作样本的效度被下调，这场修正本身就是本行必须如实呈现的争议）；**能力素质 ⇄ 文化匹配**（culture fit 既是最常被写在拒信里的理由，也是被批评得最凶的偏见外壳，Google 一派主张改口叫 culture add，看的是这个人补上了团队缺的东西，而不是像不像我们）；**主动寻访 sourcing ⇄ 被动投递漏斗**（高端与稀缺技能岗只有 outbound 人才地图一条路；量大岗位靠渠道效率、转化率与自动化，两条路的技能树几乎不重叠）；**人才地图是资产 ⇄ 人才地图是浪费**（保留制猎头把 mapping 当交付物的一部分，成功付费猎头认为地图做完单子已经黄了）；**保留制 retained ⇄ 成功付费 contingency**（按阶段预付、独家、深度地图 vs 多家赛马、入职才收钱、速度压倒深度；两种商业模式塑造出两种截然不同的作业节奏、候选人对待方式与职业道德边界，比如 off-limits 不挖回自己安置过的人）；**内部招聘团队 ⇄ 外部猎头与 RPO**（成本、速度、知识沉淀、雇主品牌归属谁的长期争论；embedded recruiter 是近年的折中）；**候选人体验 ⇄ 筛选效率**（漏斗越严体验越差，被拒者也是客户与口碑）；**AI 筛选的效率 ⇄ 合规与偏见**（简历解析、AI 面试评分、自动排序已在大规模使用，同时被监管盯上：纽约市 Local Law 144 要求自动化决策工具做偏见审计并公示、欧盟 AI 法案把招聘划为高风险场景、伊利诺伊州对 AI 视频面试单独立法；业内既离不开它，也在诉讼与审计里学做记录）；**offer 谈判的锚定 ⇄ 薪酬透明**（多地

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

红队渗透 / 攻防 — 受授权的红队作业者 + 渗透测试工程师 + 攻击型安全顾问的认知操作系统 (侦察 OSINT / 外网渗透 / 内网 AD 渗透 BloodHound + Kerberoasting + ADCS 利用 + 横向移动 / Web 应用渗透 OWASP WSTG / 移动 OWASP MASTG / 云渗透 AWS Azure GCP IAM 路径 + 容器逃逸 + K8s / C2 操作 Cobalt Strike Sliver Mythic Havoc + OPSEC / 初始访问 + AV EDR 绕过 (仅授权场景) / 无线 RF / 物理社工 / 报告与整改 / 框架 MITRE ATT&CK + D3FEND + PTES + OSSTMM + NIST 800-115 + Kill Chain / 法律伦理 CFAA + 网络安全法 + 刑法 285 286 + 数据安全法 + GDPR + 授权书 + 范围 + 交战规则 — 不含 黑产 / 未授权攻击 / 大规模 exploitation / 供应链投毒 / 未授权 DoS — 这是 重罪 + 行业封杀 + 律师吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界 — 也不含 蓝队 SOC + 恶意软件 即服务 / 僵尸网络 / 勒索软件作者 — 这是 cybercrime 不是 红队) (Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasion (phishing infrastructure, payload development, AV / EDR evasion, BYOVD, AMSI / ETW bypass — strictly for authorized engagements), (i) wireless / RF (WPA2/3, evil twin, Wi-Fi pivots), (j) physical / social engineering (badge cloning, pretexting, vishing — under engagement letter), (k) reporting & remediation (executive summary, technical findings, CVSS, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, retest), (l) frameworks & methodology (MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE D3FEND, PTES, OSSTMM, NIST SP 800-115, OWASP WSTG / MASTG, Cyber Kill Chain, Unified Kill Chain, Diamond Model), (m) law & ethics (CFAA US, Computer Misuse Act UK, 中国 刑法 285/286 + 网络安全法 + 数据安全法, GDPR for tested EU systems, engagement letter, scope, rules of engagement, safe harbor for bug bounty); NOT criminal hacking / 黑产 / unauthorized targeting / mass exploitation / supply-chain compromise / DoS against unconsented systems (这是 重罪 + 业内开除 + 律师执照吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界), NOT pure defensive blue team / SOC analyst tradecraft (是 平行学科, 仅做 边界标注 + ATT&CK 反推方向), NOT malware-as-a-service development / botnet ops / ransomware authoring (是 cybercrime 不是 红队), NOT 'ethical hacking' 在 'just curious 看看' 自我合理化的灰色操作 (违反 authorization 原则即不是 红队).) Master OS — automated mastery of Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasi

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Skillの割当表（agent -> skills）を作るときのルール集。skill-assigner が mapping を更新するときに参照する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 3: Investigate. Process mapping for existing or greenfield processes, user journey mapping, UX discovery, project goals, system architecture (integration map + data flow). Use after outcome alignment. Triggers on "investigate", "phase 3", "map the process", "process mapping", "user journey", "as-is process", or after Phase R exit checklist is complete.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when configuring Slack-specific Agentforce capabilities AFTER the basic Slack deployment is complete: enabling Slack-native actions, managing public vs. private action scope, mapping Salesforce-to-Slack user identity, or troubleshooting Slack action failures. Triggers: 'add General Slack Actions topic to agent', 'configure canvas creation for Agentforce in Slack', 'Agentforce private action requires user identity mapping', 'Slack agent cannot send DMs after deployment', 'Agentforce Look Up User action not working in Slack', 'how to map Slack users to Salesforce identities for private actions'. NOT for the initial Slack OAuth install, DM vs channel-mention mode, or core agent setup — use agentforce/agent-channel-deployment. NOT for sending a Slack message or creating a channel from a Flow — use flow/flow-for-slack.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Documenting As-Is and To-Be business processes for a Salesforce project as swim-lane diagrams — one lane per actor, explicit decision points, parallel and exception/sad paths, and per-step automation-tier annotations that drive downstream build decisions. Trigger keywords: As-Is To-Be salesforce process, swim lane salesforce, business process map, automation candidate identification, sad path documentation, process actor mapping, manual residue. NOT for Opportunity stage and exit-criteria design — use admin/sales-process-mapping. NOT for picking Flow vs Apex for one requirement — use admin/process-automation-selection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Eliciting and documenting a sales process before it is built in Salesforce: stage sequencing, entry/exit criteria per stage, win/loss analysis requirements, and stage transition rules. Trigger keywords: sales process design, stage discovery, entry criteria, exit criteria, stage gate, win/loss categorisation, sales methodology, pipeline stages, opportunity stage mapping, stage ladder, probability ladder, forecast category mapping, required fields per stage, stage swim lane, discovery workshop, handoff brief. NOT for configuring OpportunityStage, Sales Processes or Path in Setup — use admin/opportunity-management. NOT for cross-functional swim-lane maps — use admin/process-flow-as-is-to-be.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Requirements mapping for the full donor lifecycle in NPSP or Nonprofit Cloud: acquisition stage design, moves management, upgrade paths, lapsed donor re-engagement, and portfolio segmentation. NOT for mapping the Opportunity sales processes and stage picklists — use admin/fundraising-process-mapping. NOT for stewardship task automation — use admin/npsp-engagement-plans.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when defining clinical data model requirements for Health Cloud: HL7/FHIR data mapping, interoperability requirements, FHIR R4-aligned object activation, CodeableConcept constraints, and middleware translation requirements. NOT for the field-level mapping work itself — use data/fhir-data-mapping. NOT for choosing legacy HC24__ EHR objects vs standard clinical objects — use data/health-cloud-data-model.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to elicit, document, and validate CRM Analytics requirements — covering data source mapping (Salesforce object sync vs external connector vs Data Cloud), transformation needs, audience-specific lens or dashboard views, and drill-down path specifications — before any dataset or dashboard is built. Trigger keywords: CRM Analytics requirements, analytics data source mapping, CRM Analytics audience requirements, analytics visualization requirements. NOT for the formula and target behind each KPI — use admin/analytics-kpi-definition. NOT for building the dashboard once requirements are agreed — use admin/analytics-dashboard-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Map tasks to specialist agents. Use when choosing which agent for a job, comparing agent capabilities, or routing to React/Next.js/Playwright/docs/code-quality experts. Keywords: which agent, best agent for this, delegate to expert, agent capability mapping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need to design, review, or improve validation in Quarkus applications — including Bean Validation on JAX-RS resources, @Valid on parameters and CDI beans, constraint groups, @ConfigMapping validation, custom constraints, nested DTO validation, and ExceptionMapper-based error mapping. This should trigger for requests such as Add validation support in Quarkus; Review Quarkus validation rules; Improve request validation in Quarkus REST APIs; Add custom validation constraints in Quarkus; Validate Quarkus @ConfigMapping properties. Part of cursor-rules-java project

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when asked to map, crosswalk, align, compare, or gap-analyze any two cybersecurity frameworks, control catalogs, or regulatory requirements using NIST IR 8477 Set-Theory Relationship Mapping (STRM). Triggers on terms like "map controls", "crosswalk", "framework alignment", "gap analysis", or producing a STRM CSV output file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

가정 네트워크를 VLAN으로 용도별로 나누고 IoT 기기와 방문자를 PC 및 서버에서 격리하도록 스위치 포트, Wi-Fi 연결, 방화벽 규칙 설정을 돕습니다.

• 스마트 가전을 PC 및 서버에서 격리합니다
• 방문자 Wi-Fi를 인터넷 전용으로 제한합니다
• 스위치와 Wi-Fi에 VLAN을 배정합니다

Keep comparison answers readable in a terminal about 100 columns wide. Limits Markdown tables to four columns with short phrases, and switches to lists or per-item headings when the content needs longer explanations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Present concise comparisons in a narrow terminal
• Build readable mappings of flags and their effects
• Turn prose-heavy tables into lists

Evaluate 3D point clouds and movement trajectories against reference data with CloudAnalyzer. Prepare inputs, measure differences, apply quality thresholds, inspect results visually, and track baseline history for mapping, localization, and perception workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare a generated point cloud with reference data
• Measure errors in estimated movement trajectories
• Check ground segmentation against quality thresholds

Fit probabilistic models to single-cell measurements for integration across experiments, cell annotation, combined RNA and protein or ATAC analysis, and gene expression comparisons. The skill covers input requirements, training checks, reference mapping, and interpretation of model uncertainty.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Integrating single-cell RNA data across experimental batches
• Assigning cell labels using partial annotations or a reference
• Analyzing RNA with protein or ATAC measurements