41건 · 관련도순
Enumerating failure modes via pre-mortem analysis. Systematically identifies failure scenarios for plans, designs, and features, scoring them with RPN/AP. Does not write code.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Act as a project-management copilot (PM/PMO) for the delivery loop: charters, plans and schedules, estimates, risk registers, status reports, scope changes, stakeholder communication, meeting actions, lessons learned, and portfolio roll-ups, in a per-project `_project/` workspace. Use whenever the user wants to start, plan, track, rescue, or report on a project: "kick off this project", "make a project plan / timeline / WBS", "what date can I commit to", "build a risk register", "run a pre-mortem", "write the weekly status report", "the deadline slipped, what now", "turn this meeting into action items", "review my project portfolio", in any language ("quản lý dự án", "gestion de projet", "プロジェクト管理", "项目管理"), even when they never say "project management". Also use whenever a `_project/` directory exists and the user asks about schedule, deadline, risk, status, scope, budget, or stakeholders. Not for what to build (product-manager) or company-level bets (strategy-board).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured approaches to decisions under uncertainty and complexity. Covers expected value, decision trees, multi-criteria decision analysis, System 1 vs System 2 allocation, pre-mortems, reversible vs irreversible decisions, and the distinction between good decisions and good outcomes. Use when choosing among alternatives with uncertain or multi-dimensional consequences, especially when the stakes justify a deliberate rather than intuitive process.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when stress-testing a proposal, plan, architecture or decision before committing to it, such as pre-mortems, assumption audits, "should we even do this?" questions, or when everyone agrees too easily. Not for code review; it challenges strategy, approach and hidden risks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prospective failure analysis using Gary Klein's pre-mortem technique. Assumes complete failure, works backward to identify risks, leading indicators, and circuit breakers. Counters optimism bias by forcing systematic exploration of failure modes before they materialize. Use for project plans, architecture decisions, technology adoption, business strategy, or feature launches. Triggers on "리스크", "위험", "실패하면", "swing-mortem", "뭐가 잘못될 수 있어", "risk", "what could go wrong", "걱정되는 점", "failure modes", "리스크 분석", "위험 분석".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Ideate a brand-new game concept with the user, from a blank page or a one-line hint to a finished CONCEPT card. Use it whenever the user wants to come up with a new game — whether the project has no design document yet, or already has one and they're exploring a fresh idea. Through a structured divergence/convergence dialogue it explores ideas, frames the hook, generates and scores concepts (market validation delegated to /unikit-gd-explore), and settles pillars, loops, motivation, and a pre-mortem. Trigger whenever the user wants to make or invent a game, doesn't know where to start, or gives a genre/theme hint, e.g. "let's come up with a game", "I don't know what game to make", "I want to make a roguelike", "a game about zombies", "a farming game", "help me come up with a concept". For researching or dissecting existing games use /unikit-gd-explore; to write an already-chosen concept as the master GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured second-pass reasoning after a review or plan verdict: pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic lens, etc. NOT for initial review (mk:review) or new plans (mk:plan-creator).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Orchestrate one or more thinking frameworks to work through any problem, decision, document, or idea rigorously. Diagnoses which frameworks fit — inversion, pre-mortem, assumption-mapping, socratic, adversarial-hat — then guides the user through them in the right sequence. Load when the user asks for deep thinking, says "help me think through this properly", "apply your best thinking frameworks", "I need to think carefully before deciding", or "what thinking tools should I use here". Also the entry point for any complex problem where the right framework is unclear. Covers product decisions, engineering tradeoffs, personal decisions, strategy, creative challenges — any domain.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.