'risk' 검색 결과

Calculate and interpret the PREVENT-ASCVD risk score (10-year and 30-year) for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease per the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline. Covers inputs required, risk-category thresholds (low <3%, borderline 3–<5%, intermediate 5–<10%, high ≥10%), when to use the 30-year calculation (adults 30–59), and how PREVENT differs from the older Pooled Cohort Equations (lower risk estimates by 40–50%, race-agnostic). Use when a clinician asks what the 10-year ASCVD risk is, how to calculate PREVENT, PCE vs PREVENT, risk category for this patient, does my patient need a statin, 30-year risk calculation, primary prevention risk assessment. Grounded in the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from NASA Risk Management Handbook (NASA/SP-2011-3422). Use for risk-informed decision making, continuous risk management, performance commitments, risk scenario diagrams, risk disposition types, risk burn-down schedules, objectives hierarchies, deliberation and alternative selection, risk driver identification, and RM planning for space and safety-critical programmes. Does not cover domain-specific PRA methods (fault trees, event trees) in procedural depth — see NASA PRA Procedures Guide for those.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze investment returns and portfolio risk using loss thresholds, average losses beyond those thresholds, and peak-to-trough declines. Combine simulated price paths with historical and hypothetical market shocks to produce a risk report and control recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Examining risks behind backtest results
• Comparing portfolio losses under market shocks
• Measuring drawdowns and time to recovery

Evaluate existing SaaS providers and vendors using industry-weighted scores, contractual service targets, and four areas of third-party risk. Produce scorecards, service compliance reports, and risk matrices to support renewal reviews and identify potential service credit claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing quarterly vendor scorecards
• Reviewing service target breaches and potential credit claims
• Classifying risks across a SaaS portfolio

Combine product usage, support issues, payment status, and renewal dates to rank accounts by churn risk, meaning the risk of cancellation. Produce a Slack list with specific evidence and a suggested next action for each account.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing accounts at risk of cancellation each day
• Prioritizing outreach before contract renewals
• Understanding why an account received a high risk rating

Assess operational risks in processes, projects, or suppliers using provided evidence. Separate observed facts from possible consequences, propose practical responses, and prepare concise summaries or risk registers without treating unknown controls as confirmed gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assess risks in business processes
• Review operational risks in projects or suppliers
• Prepare a risk register

Identifies, assesses, and tracks organizational risk — building and maintaining a risk register, scoring exposure, assigning owners and treatments, and preparing for audit. Use this to stand up a risk program, assess the risk in a decision or initiative, prepare for a certification or audit, decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, transferred, or avoided, or report risk posture to leadership.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RAID log methodology with decision extraction from emails and meeting notes. Use when asked to identify risks, log assumptions, track issues, extract decisions from correspondence, create or update a RAID log, escalate a risk to an issue, assess project risks, validate or challenge assumptions, or capture scope-relevant decisions. Also triggers when the user pastes email chains and asks what decisions were made, or needs to find buried decisions and untested assumptions in correspondence. Trigger on: 'risk report', 'RAID log', 'what are the risks', 'what decisions were made', 'update the risk register', 'what assumptions are we making', 'what could go wrong', 'flag any issues', 'extract decisions from these emails'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conducts HIPAA risk analysis per 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1) following OCR guidance methodology. Covers threat identification, vulnerability assessment, likelihood and impact determination, risk scoring, and mitigation planning for electronic protected health information. Keywords: HIPAA risk analysis, OCR guidance, threat assessment, vulnerability, risk management, ePHI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structures risk mitigation planning and residual risk tracking for Data Protection Impact Assessments under GDPR Article 35(7)(d). Covers mitigation measure identification, implementation tracking, residual risk acceptance, and Art. 36 prior consultation triggers. Keywords: DPIA mitigation, risk treatment, residual risk, Art. 35(7)(d), safeguards, mitigation tracking, prior consultation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantify cyber risk using FAIR methodology with Monte Carlo simulation, assess control effectiveness against NIST CSF/CIS/ISO 27001 frameworks, evaluate risk appetite alignment, and analyze cyber insurance coverage adequacy. Covers threat landscape mapping, asset valuation, loss event frequency and magnitude estimation, annualized loss expectancy calculation, control gap analysis with ROI ranking, residual risk assessment, and insurance policy gap modeling at 90th/95th/99th percentile loss scenarios. Use when building risk registers, preparing board-level risk dashboards, evaluating security investment priorities, assessing cyber insurance coverage, or auditing any organization's risk quantification maturity per NIST RMF, ISO 27005, or FAIR standards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze customer health signals, identify churn risk flags, and generate an intervention playbook. Use when user says "churn risk", "customer at risk", "red account", "at-risk customer", "health score dropped", "renewal at risk", "customer going dark", "cancel risk", or "what's wrong with this account" - even if they don't say "churn" explicitly. Applies to CSMs triaging accounts or building proactive retention workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a practitioner needs to classify the risk level of an upcoming Salesforce deployment, define rollback trigger conditions, or assign decision authority before the release window opens. Triggers: 'how risky is this release', 'what needs rollback planning', 'classify deployment risk', 'pre-deployment risk checklist', 'rollback decision authority', 'high risk metadata types'. NOT for executing the deployment itself, writing CI/CD pipeline code, or troubleshooting failures after a deployment has already run — use admin/change-management-and-deployment for execution planning and devops/deployment-error-troubleshooting for post-failure diagnosis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze Git changes before submitting or merging a pull request. Assess risk and complexity, classify changes, suggest reviewer roles, and identify files needing closer inspection using diff statistics and file-level risk analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assess change risks before submitting a pull request
• Review large changes spanning multiple modules
• Identify reviewer roles suited to the changes

Review a product or AI idea across ten internal and external risk areas. Identify useful tests and measurements, separate immediate actions from ongoing monitoring, and produce a prioritized risk register with concrete next steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing risks before adding an idea to the roadmap
• Choosing tests before committing a team and budget
• Identifying external forces that could disrupt a product

Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any NIST AI RMF or AI governance risk question should use this skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Vendor privacy risk tiering methodology for processor management. Covers scoring factors including data volume, sensitivity, transfer locations, certifications, breach history, and control maturity with weighted risk calculation and tier assignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provides combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment template with integrated risk scoring matrix. Covers GDPR Art. 35 DPIA elements, AI Act high-risk system requirements, mitigation measures, and human oversight assessment. Keywords: DPIA template, conformity assessment, risk scoring, AI Act, combined assessment, high-risk AI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks. Trigger with "what are the risks", "risk assessment", "risk register", "what could go wrong", or when the user is evaluating risks associated with a project, vendor, process, or decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce a risk matrix or heatmap that quantifies what could break by business impact × probability, runs failure mode analysis on the top items, and maps test coverage to risk zones. Includes stakeholder interview frameworks and continuous reassessment. Run this BEFORE test-strategy or test-planning. Use when: "risk assessment," "risk matrix," "risk heatmap," "what could break," "critical paths," "failure modes," "where to focus testing." Not for: multi-quarter QA direction — use test-strategy. Not for: a single sprint/release test plan — use test-planning. Not for: hands-on session-based bug hunting — use exploratory-testing. Related: test-strategy, test-planning, release-readiness, qa-metrics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Surface risks through guided questioning, helping users consider pivots, constraints, and prioritization during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Triggers on requests to identify risks, stress-test the idea, perform red team review, or when user asks "what could go wrong?", "identify risks", "red team", "risk assessment", "challenge assumptions", "stress test the idea". Consumes all prior IDs (CFD-, BR-, FEA-, PER-, UJ-, SCR-) as interview context. Outputs RISK- entries with owner decisions and mitigations. Feeds v0.5 Technical Stack Selection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Constructs risk parity allocation with equal risk contribution, leverage optimization, and asset class volatility targeting. Use when building risk parity, equalizing risk contribution, or designing leveraged balanced portfolios.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Risk Assessment & Position Sizing — volatility profile (beta/ATR/HV), historical drawdowns, correlation analysis, liquidity risk, position sizing tables (fixed %, volatility-adjusted, Kelly Criterion), and VaR estimates. Returns Risk Score (0-100, higher = safer). Triggered by "trade risk <TICKER>".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.