585건 · 관련도순
Supports medical device quality investigations through CAPA, a process for corrective and preventive action. Helps identify root causes, plan actions, verify results, and report overdue cases, recurrence rates, and other program metrics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Group bug reports by their underlying cause and plan shared fixes. This skill guides reproduction, checks for unnecessary complexity, and requires named test evidence before treating related issues as resolved.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Explore web application vulnerabilities by class, including access control failures, XSS, and SQL injection. Use root causes, testing checklists, and examples to plan investigations and distinguish observable security impact from an initial warning sign.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Coordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic root-cause debugging. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause investigation first. Four phases: Root Cause Investigation, Pattern Analysis (6 known patterns), Hypothesis Testing (3-strike rule), Implementation. Structured debug report output.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts digital forensics investigations following a personal data breach, covering evidence preservation, chain of custody documentation, log analysis, scope determination, and root cause analysis. References industry-standard tools including Splunk, ELK Stack, and Wireshark. Provides forensic workflow from initial evidence collection through final investigation report. Keywords: digital forensics, breach investigation, evidence preservation, chain of custody, root cause analysis, Splunk, ELK, Wireshark.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts structured post-breach remediation using a lessons learned framework covering root cause remediation, control gap closure, policy updates, training modifications, monitoring enhancements, and regulatory follow-up. Provides a systematic approach to preventing breach recurrence and demonstrating accountability to supervisory authorities. Keywords: post-breach, remediation, lessons learned, root cause, control gap, policy update, training.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging methodology - scientific method, hypothesis testing, and root cause analysis that works across all technologiesUse when "bug, debugging, not working, broken, investigate, root cause, why is this happening, figure out, troubleshoot, doesn't work, unexpected behavior, debugging, root-cause, hypothesis, scientific-method, troubleshooting, bug-hunting, investigation, problem-solving" mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs root cause analysis on DAG execution failures. Traces failure propagation, identifies systemic issues, and generates actionable remediation guidance. Activate on 'failure analysis', 'root cause', 'why did it fail', 'debug failure', 'error investigation'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or performance issues (use dag-performance-profiler).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Disciplined diagnosis workflow for hard, intermittent, or multi-component bugs and performance regressions: inspect logs and existing evidence, build a feedback loop, test falsifiable hypotheses, instrument gaps, and verify the outcome. Use when the root cause is unclear, reproduction is unreliable, several causes or components are plausible, or performance has regressed. Do NOT use for obvious single-cause errors, straightforward configuration or syntax fixes, planned feature work, or broad architecture review. Diagnosis-only requests stop after reporting the root cause and evidence; apply a fix only when the user requested one.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug directly) when the user reports errors, 500 errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, "it was working yesterday", or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. (gstack)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging methodology covering root cause analysis, log-based debugging, production debugging, memory leak diagnosis, deadlock detection, performance anomaly investigation, and reproducible bug reproduction. Distilled from real experience at Google, DeepMind, ByteDance, and Huawei. USE WHEN: investigating production incidents, debugging hard-to-reproduce bugs, analyzing crash dumps, finding race conditions, diagnosing memory leaks, debugging performance regressions, or any situation requiring systematic root cause analysis. Triggers on "debugging", "root cause", "bug", "crash", "segfault", "deadlock", "race condition", "memory leak".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.