'search evaluation' 검색 결과

Design and implement RAG systems, which retrieve documents to inform AI answers. Get document preparation strategies, vector database comparisons, combined keyword and meaning-based search, result reranking, and an evaluation plan for retrieval quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Design an AI application that answers using internal documents
• Compare vector databases and document splitting strategies
• Improve search through keyword matching and result reranking

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill for Amazon e-commerce research, market validation, competitor analysis, traffic diagnosis, keyword strategy, advertising review, launch evaluation, and growth optimization using the Sif MCP server and Sif's real marketplace, traffic, keyword, sales, and ad data. Trigger when users mention Sif, Sif MCP, ASIN research, Amazon product opportunity research, keyword opportunity, competitor teardown, traffic drop/root-cause diagnosis, advertising structure review, or whether a product/market is worth entering, launching, scaling, optimizing, or abandoning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

논문과 연구 계획을 공통 기준으로 검토하고 연구 방법, 근거, 인용, 글의 구성을 점검합니다. 평가 이유와 수정 우선순위, 다음 수정 사항을 정리합니다.

• 투고 전 논문 검토
• 인용 문헌의 주장 뒷받침 여부 확인
• 연구 방법과 한계 평가

Implement .NET workflows for Azure AI Foundry projects, including agent creation, resource connections, dataset uploads, model deployment inspection, search index management, and evaluations. Examples also cover authentication, asynchronous operations, and resource cleanup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Creating and running agents from a .NET application
• Inspecting resource connections and model deployments
• Uploading datasets and managing search indexes

Implement Java workflows for Azure AI Foundry projects using SDK examples for authentication, connected resources, datasets, search indexes, and model evaluations. The skill also covers client setup, paginated resource lists, and error handling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• List connected Azure resources
• Create or update search indexes
• Implement access to model evaluations

Design RAG systems that retrieve relevant documents to support LLM answers. The skill guides document splitting, meaning-based and keyword search, result reranking, and separate retrieval evaluation to improve the context passed to the model.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing document retrieval for LLM answers
• Reviewing document splitting strategies
• Combining keyword and meaning-based search

Design the controls around autonomous agents: what they can edit, how results are evaluated, how progress is logged, and when human approval is required. Build research and experiment loops with clear recovery and review rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing autonomous research and experiment loops
• Separating editable work from fixed evaluation rules
• Preserving progress and failed attempts across long runs

Plan a 10–12 page systems research paper for conferences such as OSDI and SOSP. Get section page budgets, paragraph roles, and writing patterns that connect the research problem, design decisions, and evaluation evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning sections within a systems conference page limit
• Structuring an abstract and introduction
• Explaining design choices alongside alternatives

Use Phoenix to record execution traces, detailed records of an AI application's operations, and investigate problems. Evaluate answers on datasets, compare prompts and models, and set up monitoring through a self-hosted server.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigate AI application problems using execution traces
• Evaluate answer quality across a test dataset
• Compare prompts and models through experiments

Guides iterative improvement of AI agent prompts, skills, and memory using A-Evolve. It explains how to evaluate agents against benchmark tasks, apply changes, validate results, and track or roll back revisions with Git.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Improve an existing agent against benchmark tasks
• Build evaluations for domain-specific tasks
• Refine skills and memory from failure feedback

Prepare an AI-SPEC.md design agreement for an AI development phase. The skill coordinates framework selection, documentation and domain research, and evaluation planning so the phase has a defined technical direction and assessment strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Define the design agreement for an AI development phase
• Research frameworks, documentation, and the application domain
• Plan how to evaluate an AI system

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create and check long-running video material evaluation tasks. Use this skill when the user wants to submit videos for evaluation, check an existing video evaluation task list, or fetch the result of a previously created video evaluation task. This skill is not a general-purpose video upload skill because upload is allowed only as an internal step of task creation. Authentication uses an API key passed as an Authorization bearer token.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct deep OSINT research on individuals. Build full digital footprint, psychoprofile (MBTI/Big Five), career history, social graph with confidence scores. Recursive self-evaluation until completeness threshold is met. Includes internal intelligence (Telegram history, email, vault contacts) before going external. Use when: "osint", "досье", "research person", "find everything about", "пробей", "разведка", "due diligence", "background check", "digital footprint", "найди всё про", "собери информацию", "кто это", "профиль человека". NOT for: company/product research without a named person, competitive analysis, market research, content generation, or general web scraping tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigate model specifications, requirements, and evaluation strategy. Use when researching a model before benchmarking: reading HuggingFace model cards, estimating VRAM requirements, selecting GPU providers, and determining evaluation approach. Triggers on "model research", "investigate model", "model info", "VRAM estimate", "which provider", "model card".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn academic papers into structured reviews that explain findings, strengths, weaknesses, and research methods. Assess originality and supporting evidence, compare relevant literature, and provide specific improvement suggestions in a detailed review or brief summary.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Understanding a paper's findings and limitations
• Preparing a draft peer review
• Checking experimental design and reproducibility

Review papers, drafts, and research ideas with evidence-linked feedback focused on improvement. Audit low-stakes assessment rubrics, trace supporting evidence, and check rater agreement and uncertainty without ranking people or recommending consequential decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Prepare evidence-linked feedback on a paper draft
• Review strengths and limitations of a research idea
• Check assessment criteria and evidence traceability

Evaluate LLM application quality using automated scores, human reviews, and another language model as a judge. Compare models or prompts, establish baseline results, and detect quality drops through repeatable tests and statistical comparisons.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing models and prompts
• Checking quality before deployment
• Evaluating search quality in RAG applications

Audit research experiments before using their results to support claims. An independent model checks reference data, metric calculations, result files, and evaluation scope, producing reports with evidence, findings, and specific actions to address concerns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Verify the source of reference data
• Check score normalization and metric calculations
• Match paper claims against saved results