'suppression' 검색 결과

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. Also triggers on: PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

River Review のメインエントリポイント。 レビュー依頼の intent classification → 専門 skill 選択 → 実行 → finding verification → feedback classification → fixture / reference / suppression への還元までを束ねる improvement-loop orchestrator。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

検査器（linter / ガード / CI ゲート / バリデータ / フィルタ）そのものの検出力が差分で静かに落ちていないか、また新設した検査が実際に検出できることが実証されているかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 unverified detection reduction（検査器の検出ロジック（正規表現・除外パターン・解決集合・allowlist・baseline）を変更して検出件数が減ったのに、減った 1 件ずつが誤検出であった根拠が示されないまま「誤検出を潰した」「N → M 件に減少」と改善として主張している）、Check 2 unproven guard detection power（新しい検査ロジック・CI ゲート・バリデーションを追加・変更したのに、検出すべき入力を注入して検出されること／検出すべきでない入力で黙ることを示す変異注入の証跡が無く、「追加した」「CI が緑」を検出力の証拠として扱っている）、の 2 Check を対象とする report-only。テスト自身のアサーションが実質何も検証していない構造は test-assertion-effectiveness、レビュー基準・品質ゲートの明示的な弱体化（ルールの削除・閾値の引き下げ・suppression entry 追加・lint ルールの無効化）は review-criteria-integrity、リファクタ完了主張一般の検証は refactor-claim-audit、workflow の permissions と action pin は gha-workflow-security、設定ファイルの構文・型の妥当性は config-json へ委譲する

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

프로젝트 품질 기준을 수치와 확인 방법으로 문서화합니다. 변경 내역에서 테스트 생략, 경고 억제, 기준 하향을 점검해 에이전트 개발의 품질을 유지합니다.

• 에이전트 개발의 품질 기준 설정
• 커버리지와 성능 목표 선택
• 테스트 생략과 경고 억제 발견

Set up ShellCheck to inspect shell scripts without running them. Understand warnings, configure checks for the intended shell, document exceptions, and integrate analysis into CI, editors, or checks that run before commits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing existing shell scripts for common issues
• Adding shell script checks to CI/CD
• Configuring checks for the intended shell

Review and refine source-code comments and documentation attached to functions or other declarations. The skill removes redundant explanations, checks outdated TODOs, and preserves concise, evidence-based reasons and constraints that maintainers cannot readily infer from the code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Cleaning up redundant code comments
• Reviewing TODO and FIXME markers
• Checking documentation when changing code

Check security audit findings against code evidence and trace how untrusted input moves through a system. Guide a second review, document verification gaps, and assess draft reports against a minimum quality score before delivery.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Verifying evidence behind security review findings
• Rechecking input flows after an initial analysis
• Assessing report quality before delivery

Identify repeated NuGet package restores across .NET build, test, and publish steps. Check whether earlier restores cover each later step, apply targeted changes, and validate the pipeline without removing required dependency restoration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Remove repeated package restores from CI pipelines
• Check where --no-restore can safely be added
• Investigate NETSDK1004 or NETSDK1047 after skipping restore

Introduce nullable reference types into an existing C# project, making explicit which references may be null. Plan a staged migration, resolve compiler warnings, and clarify public API annotations while preserving runtime behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Adopting nullable reference types in an existing C# project
• Migrating a large codebase file by file
• Clarifying nullability in public APIs

Reproduce and verify Weave Router behavior locally with Docker Compose and Claude CLI. Test model routing, response conversion, and streaming against real APIs or a mock service, then inspect logs without changing global Claude Code settings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reproducing routing bugs in a local environment
• Verifying router fixes through Claude CLI
• Testing streaming behavior with mock responses

Linting best practices and golangci-lint configuration for Golang projects — running linters, configuring .golangci.yml, suppressing warnings with nolint directives, interpreting lint output, and selecting linters. Use when configuring golangci-lint, asking about lint warnings or nolint suppressions, setting up code quality tooling, or choosing linters. Also use when the user mentions golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, or revive. Not for wiring a lint step into a GitHub Actions pipeline (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration` skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA using variant callers optimized for low allele fractions with UMI-based error suppression. Reliably detects mutations at VAF above 0.5 percent using consensus-based approaches. Use when identifying tumor mutations from plasma DNA or tracking specific variants.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "build a win-back campaign", "re-engage lapsed subscribers", "run a re-permission / re-consent sweep", or "sunset my dead list"; produces a closed-loop reactivation program — a lapsed-cohort definition, a staged offer ladder, a re-consent (re-permission) capture step, and a sunset-confirm / suppression rule. Owns none of the SEND-N sub-item notes: engagement-decay / sunset is email-sequence-designer's and preference-center / frequency options is preference-frequency-manager's — this skill references those notes, it does not re-emit them. Not for the general lifecycle flows (welcome/cart/post-purchase) — use email-sequence-designer; not for the preference-center / opt-down ladder — use preference-frequency-manager; not for the consent record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or the N1 veto — use email-quality-auditor. 流失召回/重新授权/沉默用户清理

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "log this subscriber's opt-in", record unsubscribes/complaints, or query lawful basis; curates pseudonymous consent facts through the append-only consent stream and applies suppression/erasure tombstones immediately. Not for SEND scoring — use email-quality-auditor; not for building segments — use list-segment-builder. 订阅同意台账/实时退订抑制/合法性依据登记

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-screen analysis outputs (tables, figures, logs) built on restricted or confidential data for statistical-disclosure-limitation problems before any release. Scans for small cell counts, complementary-suppression gaps, dominance (p-percent / (n,k)), re-identifiable exact counts, PII leakage, and unrounded sensitive statistics; classifies each finding CRITICAL / WARNING / OK and gates on any CRITICAL. Use before depositing or sharing restricted-data results, or when the user says "disclosure check", "SDL scan", "is this output safe to release", "check for small cells", "disclosure avoidance", "pre-screen for the RDC", or "can I export this from the enclave".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Treats a ctDNA assay as a molecule-counting experiment at the Poisson edge and builds its analytical-validation case the measurement-science way. Covers the genome-equivalent currency (~330 haploid copies/ng), the lambda = input_GE x VAF sampling ceiling (lambda>=3 for ~95% detection), the error-suppression ladder (raw NGS ~1e-3 -> single-strand UMI ~1e-4/1e-5 -> duplex <1e-7), the CLSI EP17 LoB/LoD/LoD95/LoQ framework, the per-locus-vs-panel-integrated LoD distinction that lets bespoke MRD reach ppm, contrived/SEQC2 reference standards, and honest LoD reporting conditioned on input mass + consensus depth + replicate detection rate. Use when stating or trusting a sensitivity claim, designing a dilution-series validation, deciding how many genome equivalents are needed at a target VAF, choosing a single-locus vs panel-integrated LoD, or auditing a "detects 0.1% VAF" claim.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA, treating low-VAF detection as a signal-versus-noise problem set by error suppression and molecules sampled, not by the choice of caller. Distinguishes de novo CALLING (scanning a panel for unknown variants, bounded by per-locus error and multiple testing) from tumor-informed DETECTION (tracking a pre-specified variant set, where panel integration reaches single-ppm). Covers VarDict and Mutect2 for de novo calling, UMI-aware callers, and a pysam-based known-variant VAF tracker, with matched-WBC subtraction as the mandatory defense against clonal hematopoiesis (the dominant false positive). Use when calling or tracking tumor mutations from plasma cfDNA, setting a VAF threshold, or deciding whether a low-VAF call is tumor versus CHIP.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Configures and enforces SwiftLint in Swift projects using build tool plugins, run scripts, and CI. Covers .swiftlint.yml configuration, disabled_rules, opt_in_rules, only_rules, analyzer_rules, baselines, autocorrect, swiftlint:disable suppressions, reporter formats (sarif, json, checkstyle), strict and lenient modes, SwiftLintBuildToolPlugin via SimplyDanny/SwiftLintPlugins, swift package plugin swiftlint, Xcode run script phases, CI integration, multiple configuration files, and rollout strategies for existing codebases. Use when setting up SwiftLint, configuring lint rules, suppressing warnings, creating baselines, choosing between build tool plugin and run script, or integrating SwiftLint into CI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Remove repeated NuGet restores from multi-step .NET builds safely. USE FOR: build/test/publish steps that each restore, Directory.Build.rsp with -restore, safe restore suppression, NETSDK1004/NETSDK1047 after --no-restore. DO NOT USE FOR: slow first restore, only one restore, version or lock errors, unranked build slowness (use build-perf-baseline).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Enable nullable reference types in a C# project and systematically resolve all warnings. USE FOR: adopting NRTs in existing codebases, file-by-file or project-wide migration, fixing CS8602/CS8618/CS86xx warnings, annotating APIs for nullability, cleaning up null-forgiving operators, upgrading dependencies with new nullable annotations. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already fully migrated with zero warnings (unless auditing suppressions), fixing a handful of nullable warnings in code that already has NRTs enabled, suppressing warnings without fixing them, C# 7.3 or earlier projects. INVOKES: Get-NullableReadiness.ps1 scanner script.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Mass Spectrometrist. Use when a task calls for Mass Spectrometrist judgment. Reasons from ion formation, m/z resolution and mass accuracy, fragmentation, and calibrated ion statistics through ESI/APCI/MALDI tuning, CID/HCD/ETD MS/MS, isotope-pattern formula assignment, and spectral libraries (NIST, mzCloud, GNPS) under FDA/ICH M10/MSI tiers, while treating matrix suppression, PEG/siloxane/keratin contamination, decoy-driven FDR inflation, and unassigned adducts as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Environmental Chemist. Use when a task calls for Environmental Chemist judgment. Reasons from thermodynamic partitioning (K_oc/K_ow, Henry's law), pathway-specific half-lives, and mass balance through GC-MS/LC-MS/MS/ICP-MS analysis, EPI Suite and fugacity fate models, and EPA SW-846 QA/QC while treating blank contamination, matrix suppression, censored sub-LOD data, and unscoped transformation products as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Food Chemist. Use when a task calls for Food Chemist judgment. Reasons from food matrix effects, aw and lipid oxidation, AOAC-validated HPLC/GC-MS/LC-MS/MS, FoodData Central/FNDDS, and trained sensory panels while treating matrix suppression, accelerated-shelf-life misuse, and untrained-taster data as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.