433건 · 관련도순
Turn selected research conversations or notes into themes supported by evidence and counterexamples. Distinguish observed behavior from preferences and hypotheses, assess confidence, and suggest a small next experiment with an observable measure of success.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research current news and financial markets through Helium MCP. Compare coverage using bias scores, read summaries combining different perspectives, retrieve live prices and AI analysis, estimate options values, and search trending memes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Organize papers from Zotero into an Obsidian project knowledge base. The skill separates source notes, research synthesis, and writing outputs, requiring evidence records and source links before findings become claims used in later work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when generating higher-level synthesis notes such as literature reviews, comparison matrices, project summaries, or other cross-note summaries inside the project knowledge base.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Organization-grade identity-fabric mapping: tenant/federation fingerprinting and the pre-auth user-ENUMERATION oracle methodology — enumeration and fingerprint only, never credential submission. Covers domain-to-tenant resolution (Microsoft getuserrealm.srf Managed/Federated namespace check, Entra OIDC metadata tenant-GUID extraction, Autodiscover v2), keyless Microsoft tenant-federation mapping (GetFederationInformation SOAP -> sibling-domain discovery, discover-only ROE, FEDERATED_WITH provenance edge held out of attack-path pivoting), Okta org-slug derivation + OIDC fingerprint + governed custom-domain enumeration, ADFS passive/active fingerprint + version inference, Google Workspace MX-correlated detection, generic OIDC (Auth0/Keycloak/Ping Identity/OneLogin/Duo) discovery, SAML metadata (5 paths), Azure AD Seamless-SSO Negotiate-challenge detection, Microsoft Defender for Identity (MDI) sensor-API presence check, the user-enumeration oracle methodology for Microsoft GetCredentialType (IfExistsResult semantics: exists / doesn't-exist / exists-in-federated-tenant / throttled) and Okta /api/v1/authn (errorCode differential), Medium-detectability discipline with a hard 20-candidate-per-tenant cap and admin/role interest-based ranking, and name x confirmed-email-pattern login-candidate synthesis that FAILS CLOSED with zero output when no org pattern is confirmed. Grounded directly in a production ASM implementation's sso_idp.py, tenant_recon.py, and core/email_patterns.py modules. Deepens — does not duplicate — offensive-osint skill's Identity Fabric endpoint reference with the tenant-federation MAP, the oracle WORKFLOW, and the candidate-SYNTHESIS methodology that reference lacks. Use when fingerprinting an organization's identity provider, mapping its tenant/federation boundary, running an authorized pre-auth user-enumeration pass, or synthesizing login candidates from harvested names to feed that oracle — never for password spray, credential submission, or auth bypass.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting the Annual Review of Environment and Resources or deciding whether an environment-and-resources synthesis fits this invited-review venue. Encodes the journal's invited-review fit, the authoritative-synthesis bar, structure expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when systematically gathering, coding, and synthesizing a management/organization literature for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the search-and-coverage methodology and the choice of narrative vs. systematic vs. bibliometric integration. Builds the corpus and synthesis notes; it does not impose the organizing spine (amann-organizing-framework) or write prose.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs retrosynthetic planning using AiZynthFinder (template-based MCTS), maintained or version-pinned template-free models, ASKCOS, and emerging RetroSynFormer with explicit handling of route scoring, configurable MCTS rewards, building-block availability, and forward-prediction checks. Use when assessing synthetic feasibility of generated or selected molecules, planning multi-step syntheses, building synthesis-aware design pipelines, or screening libraries for retro-route feasibility.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan and execute user research including research planning, recruiting, interview design, qualitative synthesis, and translating findings into product decisions. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan user research, design interviews, recruit participants, conduct discovery, run formative research, or synthesize qualitative findings. Triggers on user research, UX research, user interviews, discovery research, generative research, formative research, qualitative research, user insights, research synthesis, recruitment, interview guide, jobs to be done. Also triggers when product decisions are being made without user input and the user wants to fix that.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Literature review for academic and R&D research: search strategy, source assessment, synthesis, and citation management. Use when conducting a systematic literature review, building a bibliography, or preparing a research-grounded report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide ethical customer discovery and research synthesis, distinguishing direct observations from inferences, preventing leading interview questions, and tracking quote-to-insight provenance. (triggers: `product customer discovery`, `product research synthesis`)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Synthesises the current conversation context into a Product Requirements Document and publishes it to GitHub (as a comment on a referenced issue, or a new issue). Synthesises from context; does not interview. TRIGGER when: the conversation has produced enough understanding of a feature and the user wants it captured as a PRD. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a single small issue is enough → creating-issues; the idea has not been stress-tested yet → grilling-ideas first; bug reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when `evidence-review` has completed extraction and needs a bounded narrative synthesis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Read, write, and edit ChemDraw CDX/CDXML files with RDKit's rdkit.Chem.rdChemDraw plus direct XML editing, always paired with a rendered PNG. Parse molecules and reactions from .cdxml/.cdx, write structures with good 2D depiction, and hand-build or modify the parts RDKit cannot write: reaction arrows, plus signs, schemes/steps, and text/labels. Use for reaction schemes, synthesis routes, mechanisms, retrosynthesis, or SI figures. Critical: RDKit writes structures only — round-tripping a reaction through a Mol silently drops arrows and text; this skill shows the XML layer that preserves them. For pure molecular analysis (descriptors, fingerprints, SMARTS) use rdkit-cheminformatics; for multi-format 3D conversion use openbabel.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AiZynthFinder retrosynthetic route planning (CASP) from AstraZeneca Molecular AI. Monte Carlo tree search guided by a template-based neural expansion policy recursively disconnects a target SMILES until precursors are found in a purchasable stock. Covers config.yml (v4 format), aizynthcli batch screening, the AiZynthFinder/AiZynthExpander Python API, one-step disconnections, custom stocks via smiles2stock, scorers, Retro*/breadth-first/DFPN search alternatives, and reading output.json.gz / trees.json. Use for synthesis route planning, synthesizability screening, and building-block/precursor search. For reaction barriers use neb-irc-activation-energy; for 2D reaction scheme drawing use rdkit-chemdraw-cdxml.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Mastery of the new frontier: AI-generated video that rivals—and reimagines—traditional production. This skill covers Veo3, Runway Gen-3, Sora, Kling, Pika, Luma Dream Machine, and the rapidly evolving landscape of neural video synthesis. We're not just using AI to replace traditional video—we're unlocking visuals that were previously impossible, unaffordable, or unimaginable. Flying through abstract data visualizations, impossible camera moves, photorealistic product renders from text, and consistent character performances without actors or sets. The practitioners of this skill understand that AI video is not about cost savings— it's about creative expansion. The ceiling has been removed. What would you create if production cost was zero and physics was optional? Use when "AI video, generate video, Veo3, Veo 3, Runway, Sora, Kling, Pika, Luma, text to video, image to video, video generation, AI footage, neural video, synthetic video, impossible shot, ai-video, veo3, runway, sora, kling, pika, generation, text-to-video, neural, synthesis" mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
管理咨询 (管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的价值之辩 (「借你的表告诉你时间」「frameworks 是剧场表演 vs 真洞见」Matthew Stewart《The Management Myth》)、McKinsey 的丑闻 (Purdue 阿片类/独裁政府/ICE/利益冲突, Bogdanich & Forsythe《When McKinsey Comes to Town》)、咨询 vs 自建战略部、generalist 通才 vs specialist 专才之争、AI/GenAI 对初级分析师工作的冲击; (h) 流派 — 战略经典 (Porter 定位学派/五力 vs 资源基础观 RBV vs 蓝海战略 Kim&Mauborgne vs 颠覆式创新 Christensen vs Mintzberg 应急战略批判 planning school); 三巨头气质分野 (McKinsey 事实驱动/CEO 信任/通才, BCG 概念/思想领导力/经验曲线/增长-份额矩阵, Bain 结果导向/NPS 净推荐值/PE 关系/与客户深度绑定)。不含: 投行 M&A/财务顾问 (估值/承销超出范畴)、纯 IT 实施/系统集成 (SI 人力外包)、纯审计/税务、纯人力 RPO/猎头、内部战略部 only (虽相关但本 skill 聚焦专业服务咨询的外部视角)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Close a GitHub issue with a synthesis comment as a flowing graph — validate the synthesis, post the closing comment, close, then run a pluggable callback (e.g. memory store) detached. Use when closing an issue should also capture the LEARNING (not just the diff log) and when the post-close work shouldn't block the close ack.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Feedback synthesis — cluster support tickets, NPS verbatims, app store reviews, and churn surveys by theme, separate signal from noise, and produce an actionable insight report. Use when asked to "synthesize this feedback", "analyze support tickets", "what are users complaining about", "NPS analysis", "churn feedback synthesis", or "what's the feedback telling us".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Meta-mathematical connections, cross-domain synthesis, and the Complex Plane as a navigational tool. Classifies problems by quadrant (Abstract/Embodied x Logic/Creativity), routes them to relevant domains, and traces dependency chains. Use when classifying mathematical problems across domains, navigating the Complex Plane of Experience, finding cross-domain connections, or building multi-domain solution strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Model ElevenLabs voice synthesis as an ACSet schema with Unison ability handlers for typed voice operations. Use when integrating ElevenLabs TTS into category-theoretic pipelines, building typed voice synthesis workflows, or managing multi-voice narration with GF(3) conservation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Integrate multiple source findings into an attributed synthesis or comparison. Use for combine these summaries, synthesize results, merge findings or multi-source analysis. Preserve claim-level provenance, coverage, qualifiers, conflicts and uncertainty rather than repeatedly compressing narrative summaries.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.