'code-review' 검색 결과

完成任务、实现重要功能或合并前使用，用于验证工作成果是否符合要求

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

收到代码审查反馈后、实施建议之前使用，尤其当反馈不明确或技术上有疑问时——需要技术严谨性和验证，而非敷衍附和或盲目执行

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write custom Semgrep rules to identify organization-specific logic flaws, improper cryptography usage, or missing authorization checks during source code review. This skill focuses on moving beyond default rulesets to locate complex vulnerabilities.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decompile, analyze, and reverse engineer Android applications (APKs). Utilize tools like JADX, Apktool, and dex2jar to extract source code (Java/Kotlin), analyze manifest configurations (Intents, Activities), and identify hardcoded secrets or insecure API endpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform structured code reviews focusing on correctness, readability, security, and maintainability. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, evaluating code changes, or establishing review standards for a team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-commit code quality review for Unity C# code. Checks against Rules, CODING_STANDARDS.md, NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md, and GDD Gherkin test coverage. Use when code has been written and tests are passing but before committing. Runs automatically at Step 8.5 of /uw-cmd-implement-feature. Triggers on "review this code", "check my implementation", "pre-commit review", "code review", "check before commit", "is this ready to commit", "review my changes", or any request to validate code quality before committing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

用于用户要求通用前端代码评审、PR 评审、合并就绪评估、架构可维护性、类型安全、渲染/状态风险、样式一致性、可测性缺口或横向评审总结时。深度安全、无障碍、E2E 或性能问题应委托对应专项 skill；中文触发词包括 代码审查、代码评审、review。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review code for quality, bugs, and design issues. Use when the user says "review this code", "do a code review", "check this PR", "review this diff", "is this code good", "what's wrong with this code", "code quality check", or pastes code and wants feedback - even if they don't explicitly say "code review".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Behavioral guardrails against the six most common LLM coding failure modes: unstated assumptions, overbuilding, changes beyond the ask, no success condition, claiming done without output, and sprawling non-atomic changes. Use when writing, editing, reviewing or refactoring code, when the user says 'keep it simple', 'surgical change', 'don't over-engineer', 'minimal diff' or 'verify before saying done', or when a change keeps growing beyond the ask. For a full code review, see code-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verify code-review or security-review findings for false positives using deep codebase tracing, framework-aware analysis, and web research. Produces a .verified.md report alongside the original. Use when a review report has been generated and needs independent verification, or when user runs /verify-findings, mentions "verify review", "check false positives", or "validate findings".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert code reviewer focusing on quality, maintainability, performance, and best practices

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review a diff against dynamic-neural-field-composer's own standards - backwards compatibility, Clean Code, tools/ helper reuse, C++20 idiom, hot-path performance, and test coverage. Use before opening a PR or when asked to review a branch or change.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.