'experiments' 검색 결과

Automate and research the GitHub Copilot app desktop experience. Use for driving Copilot App sessions, creating isolated app experiments, mapping app UI/accessibility controls, taking app screenshots, saving PNG captures, optimizing WebP images, testing prompts without submitting, using app/session APIs, canvases, automations, macOS Accessibility, AppleScript, and safe end-to-end Copilot App workflow probes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert chaos engineer specializing in controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and building antifragile systems. Masters chaos experiments, game day planning, and continuous resilience improvement with focus on learning from failure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run structured prompt-injection attack and defense experiments against an LLM-integrated app before production by measuring attack success and testing detection or recovery pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert growth product management guidance for SaaS applications. Use when designing growth loops, optimizing activation and onboarding, building retention systems, creating referral mechanics, running growth experiments, defining north star metrics, or implementing PLG strategies. Covers the full growth lifecycle from acquisition to monetization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Respan for LLM observability. Use to set up tracing or the gateway, manage prompts (create/version/deploy), run evals, experiments, and datasets, or work with traces and logs. Trigger for any Respan platform task or when instrumenting an app to send telemetry to Respan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

First-run guided setup for a fresh gAIOS clone. Interviews the user (identity, role, priorities, voice, connections, team, pain, guardrails) and fills the templates — CLAUDE.md, context/, references/voice.md, connections.md — then introduces the WAT / wiki / workflows / experiments features. Trigger on "/setup", "set me up", "get started", "onboard me", or a fresh clone where CLAUDE.md still has {{placeholders}}.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design the smallest viable test to validate or invalidate a critical assumption. Based on Torres's assumption testing framework, organized by Gilad's AFTER model (Assessment → Fact-Finding → Tests → Experiments → Release Results).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

How to use the Adaptyv Bio Foundry API and Python SDK for protein experiment design, submission, and results retrieval. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Adaptyv, Foundry API, protein binding assays, protein screening experiments, BLI/SPR assays, thermostability assays, or wants to submit protein sequences for experimental characterization. Also trigger when code imports `adaptyv`, `adaptyv_sdk`, or `FoundryClient`, or references `foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Molecular ML with diverse featurizers and pre-built datasets. Use for property prediction (ADMET, toxicity) with traditional ML or GNNs when you want extensive featurization options and MoleculeNet benchmarks. Best for quick experiments with pre-trained models, diverse molecular representations. For ready-made ADMET numbers without training a model use admet-prediction; for benchmark datasets and task-aware splits use pytdc.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrate the full PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018) five-agent pipeline to turn unstructured research materials (idea, experimental log, LaTeX template, conference guidelines, optional figures) into a submission-ready LaTeX manuscript and compiled PDF. TRIGGER when the user asks to "write a paper from my experiments", "turn this idea and these results into a paper", "generate a conference submission", "run paper-orchestra on X", or otherwise wants the end-to-end paper-writing pipeline. Coordinates the outline-agent, plotting-agent, literature-review-agent, section-writing-agent, and content-refinement-agent skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-pipeline aggregator that scans AI agent cache directories (.claude, .cursor, .antigravity, .openclaw) or any user-specified directory for experimentation logs, extracts insights and numeric results, and formats them as PaperOrchestra-ready inputs (idea.md + experimental_log.md). TRIGGER when the user says "aggregate my agent logs for paper writing", "extract experiments from my coding agent history", "prepare PaperOrchestra inputs from my cache", "turn my agent logs into a paper", mentions a folder or directory they want to use as the basis for a paper, or wants to run PaperOrchestra but only has scattered agent experiment histories rather than structured inputs. Run this BEFORE paper-orchestra. Also called automatically by paper-orchestra when workspace/inputs/idea.md or workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md are missing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design and execute chaos engineering experiments using Litmus or Chaos Mesh. Test system resilience through controlled fault injection, validate hypothesis-driven tests, and improve failure recovery. Use before major product launches, after architecture changes to validate resilience, during GameDays or disaster recovery drills, to validate assumptions about failure modes, or as part of an SRE maturity program.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically interpret nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT, and 2D experiments) to elucidate molecular structure. Covers chemical shift assignment, coupling pattern analysis, integration, and correlation of multi-dimensional data into coherent structural proposals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit recent high-relevance papers from a target venue to identify claim-relevant experimental evidence gaps after core P0 results exist. Use for venue completeness and reviewer-risk analysis; not for redefining the research question or running experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validate and scientifically interpret completed research runs, including negative, null, boundary, confounded, failed, and inconclusive outcomes. Use after execution to assess evidence and claim impact; not to edit methods or schedule experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Operator-side inventory of experiment PRs for auditing a Senpai research track. It outputs merged winners, a compact results table, and full details for deep dives.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design guide + benchmarked pitfalls for building Monte-Carlo / Simulated Annealing refinement layers on top of greedy hex-grid layouts for code visualization (packages/gui/src/store/hexLayout.ts, sandbox/hex-sandbox, future Rust ports). Use when: (1) planning to add MC/SA on top of an existing hex-grid pack, (2) deciding whether a simpler SA would match a hierarchical MC with force-directed + chain drag, (3) budgeting wall-clock for million-node cold-start, (4) debugging "blob turns Swiss-cheese" or "folders stop nucleating" during MC refinement, (5) choosing between folder cohesion and raw Σ-link-length as cost function. Contains four hard-won, quantified lessons and anti-patterns that would take a full day of experiments to rediscover.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Throwaway experiments to validate feasibility before building.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building, migrating, or debugging Agent Evals on Inngest: scoring AI agent or workflow outcomes, deferred scorers, sessions, traces, step experiments, experiment variant attribution, Insights queries, or production eval loops for prompts, models, tools, providers, and agent behavior. Covers TypeScript SDK v4 scoring beta APIs, `scoreMiddleware`, `step.score`, `inngest.score`, `createScorer`, `defer`, `group.experiment`, `experimentRef`, `meta.sessions`, and when to use durable workflow primitives for outcome-based evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building durable AI agents or agentic workflows with Inngest and AgentKit, including model calls, tool calls, multi-agent networks, human approval, realtime progress, provider rate limits, crash-safe execution, and Agent Evals handoff. Covers AgentKit, `step.ai`, `step.run`, `step.waitForEvent`, native realtime, and when to use lower-level Inngest primitives instead of an in-memory agent loop. Use `inngest-agent-evals` with this skill when the user wants scoring, sessions, experiments, deferred scorers, or outcome-based evaluation for the agent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Inspect and operate Inngest Cloud through its OAuth MCP connection. Use for deployed apps and functions, failed or slow runs, traces, events, environments, sessions, experiments, and Insights. Prefer this for Cloud operations when MCP tools are available; use CLI or REST skills for explicit terminal or HTTP tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for code generation, feature work, bug fixes, refactoring, and code review when a change creates or reshapes a multi-step flow, state lifecycle, side-effect or decision ownership, cross-unit composition, or boundary contract. Also use it when an existing structural problem makes those elements hard to trace or verify. Structural change is optional. Mechanical edits, throwaway experiments, and coherent local changes stay with their current owner and focused verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DECIDE-phase doctrine for an Arbor research run: when to merge, prune, combine, or finalize; how the held-out merge gate works; and the rule that the final report uses TEST scores. Load before deciding what to do with completed experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The Arbor research-coordinator protocol: the OBSERVE -> IDEATE -> SELECT -> DISPATCH -> DECIDE cycle over a durable Idea Tree. Preloaded automatically on /auto-research sessions. The coordinator never edits code or runs commands — executors do that in isolated worktrees; the coordinator steers the tree with idea_tree / dispatch_experiments / merge_experiment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.