557건 · 관련도순
Build bilingual, evidence-backed, SIEGER v2 customer intelligence reports for foreign-trade leads. Use when OpenClaw or a sales operator needs claim-level citations, decision gates, an industry-specific analysis lens, a non-fabricated verdict card, and sales angles that require approval before downstream outreach drafting.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Construa, depure e otimize aplicativos com Claude API / SDK Anthropic. Aplicativos construídos com esta skill devem incluir cache de prompt. Também lida com migração de código Claude API existente entre versões de modelo (4.5 → 4.6, 4.6 → 4.7, substituições de modelo descontinuado). TRIGGER quando: código importa `anthropic`/`@anthropic-ai/sdk`; usuário solicita Claude API, SDK Anthropic ou Managed Agents; usuário adiciona/modifica/afina um recurso Claude (cache, thinking, compaction, tool use, batch, files, citations, memory) ou modelo (Opus/Sonnet/Haiku) em um arquivo; dúvidas sobre prompt caching / cache hit rate em um projeto SDK Anthropic. SKIP: arquivo importa `openai`/SDK de outro provedor, nome de arquivo como `*-openai.py`/`*-generic.py`, código agnóstico de provedor, programação geral/ML.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Escreva papers prontos para publicação em NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use quando estiver elaborando papers a partir de repositórios de pesquisa, estruturando argumentos, verificando citações ou preparando submissões finais. Inclui templates LaTeX, diretrizes de revisores e workflows de verificação de citações.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Web search, content extraction, crawling, and deep research via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up online, extract content from a URL, grab text from a webpage, crawl documentation, download a site's pages, discover URLs on a domain, or conduct in-depth research with citations. Also use when they say "fetch this page", "pull the content from", "get the page at https://", "find me articles about", or reference extracting data from external websites. This provides LLM-optimized web search, content extraction, site crawling, URL discovery, and AI-powered deep research — capabilities beyond what agents can do natively. Do NOT trigger for local file operations, git commands, deployments, or code editing tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Europe PMC RESTful Web Service 多源文献聚合检索原子 skill。一次调用同时召回 PubMed + PMC + AGRICOLA + CABI + 预印本(bioRxiv / medRxiv / ChemRxiv 等)+ 灰色文献,自动按 PMID/PMCID/DOI 三级去重,返回完整元数据(含全文 OA 链接、citations metadata、grants 资助信息)。当任务出现 Europe PMC、多源文献聚合、广召回、RAG 检索、预印本搜索、bioRxiv、medRxiv、全文链接、DOI 检索、跨库去重、灰色文献、资助检索 等触发词时使用。**定位**:广召回 · 多源聚合 · RAG 友好(与 pubmed-eutils 互补——后者做精准官方源、Clinical Queries;本 skill 做"撒网"式广召回)。**不做**:NCBI E-utilities 直检(交给 pubmed-eutils)、临床试验(clinical-trials-v2)、全文 XML 抽取(bioc-fulltext-fetch)、实体识别(pubtator-entity-search)、证据分级(medical-evidence-grading)。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when auditing or fixing prose that reads like a leaked reasoning transcript — dead design-session citations such as (decision N), audit item codes, or §N of uncommitted drafts; change narration such as "used to", "no longer", "this cut"; stack or review vantage ("a later PR in this stack", "rejected in review"); reviewer-addressed justifications; control-flow narration; or hedged planning residue in comments, JSDoc, docs, or Agent Notes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Posts content to WeChat Official Account (微信公众号) via API or Chrome CDP. Supports article posting (文章) with HTML, markdown, or plain text input, and image-text posting (贴图, formerly 图文) with multiple images. Markdown article workflows default to converting ordinary external links into bottom citations for WeChat-friendly output. Use when user mentions "发布公众号", "post to wechat", "微信公众号", or "贴图/图文/文章".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Converts Markdown to styled HTML with WeChat-compatible themes. Supports code highlighting, math, Mermaid (rendered to PNG via headless Chrome), PlantUML, footnotes, alerts, infographics, and optional bottom citations for external links. Use when user asks for "markdown to html", "convert md to html", "md 转 html", "微信外链转底部引用", or needs styled HTML output from markdown.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cite-or-Block 架构的基石原子 skill。把报告里的 citation 锚点 (例如 [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) 解析为源文件片段,并核对事实声明里的关键词是否在引用源原文里出现。 Foundation atomic skill for the Cite-or-Block architecture. Resolves citation anchors (e.g. [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) to raw source text fragments, and verifies whether claim keywords actually appear in the cited source. 使用场景 / Use when: 1. 报告生成后要做 fact-check (resolve_citation + verify_claim_against_source) 2. content-verification-layer 要扫全报告锚点 (parse_citations_in_text) 3. drug-citation-verifier / 任何 cross-check skill 需要"锚点 → 源原文" P0 守护:本 skill **绝不维护任何已知字典**。源里没有 = verified=False, 无例外、无 fallback、无"已知答案兜底"。 P0 guard: this skill **never maintains any built-in dictionary**. Not in source = verified=False. No fallback, no built-in answers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pre-breach impact analysis: inventories sensitive data (PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, credentials), traces data flows, scores exposure vectors, and produces a regulatory blast radius report with fine ranges sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155(a), and HIPAA 45 CFR § 160.404. Cost benchmarks from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report (annually updated). All citations in references/SOURCES.md for verification. Use when asked: "assess breach impact", "what data could be exposed", "calculate blast radius", "data exposure analysis", "how bad would a breach be", "quantify data risk", "sensitive data inventory", "data flow security audit", "pre-breach assessment", "worst-case breach scenario", "breach readiness", "data risk report", "/data-breach-blast-radius". For any stack handling user data, health records, or financial information. Output labels law-sourced figures (exact) vs heuristic estimates (planning only). Does not replace legal counsel.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct reproducible web searches and decision-oriented research across official sites, search engines, news, papers, forums, social platforms, and public datasets. Use when Codex must investigate a person, organization, product, market, technical resource, reputation, career choice, or other current topic; compare candidates; verify claims; collect dated citations; distinguish facts from inference and anecdote; or write an evidence-backed research report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Writes product-led content pages optimized for both search engines and AI engine citations. Produces markdown files with frontmatter, following page-type frameworks (comparison, guide, use case, learn, trust) with verified sources and no fabricated data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Finds free backlink and brand mention opportunities across Hacker News, Quora, GitHub, directories, and niche communities. Outputs a prioritized action plan with draft responses ready to post. Use after brand research and content creation to amplify reach and AI engine citations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Orchestrator (not a knowledge pack): routes a free-text systems-engineering question to the right catalogue pack(s), reads them with you, and answers with pack and chapter citations. Runs only on explicit `/se <question>`; carries no source content. Use when you do not know which `/pack` to ask.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Points to the standalone module law-checker ("Legal Department"): source-grounded AI first-look legal assessments for German law with a statute registry and a statute-embodiment agent. Use this skill when a situation, contract, official notice, or legal question under German law should be checked with exact citations (article/section, paragraph, sentence) -- with a clear boundary: AI-assisted first orientation, not a substitute for a lawyer.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI-first web search via Exa — semantic/neural ranking, category-scoped results, fresh content retrieval, and one-shot answer synthesis with citations. Use when the user needs current web information better ranked than general web search, or a grounded answer with sources.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Search academic references for a manuscript and export them to a verified refs CSV, then optionally hand off to cec-sheet. Claims are decomposed into conditions that define when to stop; references are found by keyword search (Mode A targeted / Mode B agentic via Codex CLI, run as two independent search routes) and by citation chaining (Mode C — backward refs, forward citations, similar articles, same author, and reference lists of OA full text/PDF, imozuru-style). All paths end in bundled deterministic tools (scripts/pubmed_search.py, scripts/citation_chain.py) that fetch bibliography live from PubMed, so PMIDs are never fabricated, and each supporting sentence is machine-verified verbatim against the fetched abstract. Triggers: "論文検索", "文献検索", "文脈検索", "コンテキスト検索", "原稿の引用を探して", "原典を探して", "芋づる", "引用をたどって", "被引用", "孫引き", "refs.csv", "codex-refs", "/codex-refs".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Perform comprehensive, multi-source research on any topic using AI-powered web search and analysis. Covers deep_research for broad discovery and semantic_content_search for site-specific knowledge retrieval. Use when you need to research brands, markets, competitors, or trends with citations — before creating content, planning campaigns, or making strategic decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citatio
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "build programmatic SEO pages", "generate pages at scale", "rank on a high-authority third-party site", "borrow domain authority", "build a vs / alternative page", "do local SEO", "optimize a Google Business Profile", or "fix NAP" — one page-build router with four modes: programmatic (template × dataset systems), parasite (barnacle publishing on Medium/Reddit/LinkedIn/GitHub), comparison (vs / alternative pages in four formats), and local (GBP + NAP + citations + location pages), each with its own thin/duplicate, honesty, or reputation-abuse guardrail. Not for finding what to target — use keyword-research or content-gap-analysis; not for drafting one standalone article — use content-writer; not for scoring a page for publish — use content-quality-auditor. 程序化SEO/批量页面/寄生SEO/借势权重/对比页/vs页/替代页/本地SEO/谷歌商家档案/NAP一致性
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "optimize for AI citations"; improves citation readiness for ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini, and Claude. Not for structural on-page SEO — use on-page-seo-checker; not for net-new drafting — use content-writer. AI引用优化/GEO优化/AI搜索
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.