'code-review' 검색 결과

Run a final code review on a pull request

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test authoring guidance

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use after meaningful implementation work to create an independent Yardlet review task

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when recording, tallying, or triaging stochastic review findings — the append-only JSONL ledger where Tier 2 (advisory, unevidenced) reviewer output goes instead of blocking language. Triggers on "log this finding", "ledger add", "tally the findings", "triage findings", "is this finding recurring", "retire this noise", or whenever a reviewer produces an unevidenced concern that should be measured for recurrence rather than chased. For the review itself see code-review-and-quality or skill-library-review; for verifying formal claims with deterministic evidence see adversarial-claims-reviewer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conducts multi-axis code review across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Triggers on "review my PR", "review this diff", "code review", "review this changeset", "is this ready to merge", "pre-merge review".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when reviewing or auditing a library of Claude Code skills, agents, slash commands, and workflows — frontmatter correctness, routing quality, tool allowlists, command arg-hints, workflow meta/phase coherence, cross-reference coherence, single-responsibility, file structure, and anti-pattern detection. Triggers on mentions of "review skills", "audit agents", "skill library", "agent definition review", "review this command", "review this workflow", "is this skill right", or when iterating on `.claude/skills/`, `.claude/agents/`, `.claude/commands/`, or `.claude/workflows/` directories. For code review of source code see code-review-and-quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Git branching strategies, conflict resolution, rebase workflows, monorepo patterns, and advanced operations like cherry-pick, bisect, and reflog recovery. Activate on "git", "branching strategy", "merge conflict", "rebase", "cherry-pick", "monorepo git", "git bisect", "git reflog", "squash commits". NOT for GitHub Actions CI/CD (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), GitHub API/webhooks, or PR review processes (use code-review-checklist).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A gate before git push / deploy — assembled from your own tools (secret-grep + slop-scan + code-review + build/compile + optional worktree isolation), so AI junk (slop / bugs / secrets / uncompiled code) never reaches a remote or a production server. Turns "I hope it's clean" into a verifiable criterion. Branches: web/OSS (git push/PR) vs deploy-to-server service. Triggers — "check before push", "clean push", "gate before push", "finalize before commit", "run before deploy".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review Replica pull requests using the same shared conventions and project guides as implementation agents. Use when reviewing changes to code, tests, workflows, or documentation in this repository.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Python code quality review lens. SOLID principles, dead code, exception handling, resource leaks, thread safety, performance. Triggered by "quality" ("품질"), "SOLID", "dead code" ("데드코드"), "exception", "resource leak", "thread safety" keywords.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review changed code for correctness, security, maintainability, and verification gaps. Use when code is ready for independent review or before handoff, staging, or merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reviews a GitHub PR with a single shallow correctness/security/breaking/AI-slop checklist and emits a verdict; optionally posts it via gh pr review. Use to review an external or teammate PR. NOT for deep pre-landing audit of your own diff (see mk:review); NOT for responding to received review comments (see mk:respond-pr).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial analysis, scope-aware dispatch, adversarial persona passes, and forced-finding protocol. Supports input modes: branch diff (default), PR number (#123), commit hash, pending changes (--pending). Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", "check my diff", or "review #123". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. NOT for behavioral verification against a running build (see mk:evaluate); NOT for post-implementation simplification (see mk:simplify).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage reviewer comments on a GitHub PR with receiving-code-review discipline — verify each against the codebase, then accept/push-back/clarify, and optionally reply in-thread. Use when responding to received PR feedback. NOT for giving a review (see mk:review-pr); NOT for implementing the fixes (hand off to mk:fix).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

code-review-graph (CRG) MCP wrapper — token-efficient context retrieval via AST knowledge graph. Exposes 4 core tools from CRG.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Passive code-review lane for authorized repositories, local checkouts, uploaded source archives, and diffs. Use when the security research agent needs deterministic candidate discovery before expensive AI investigation, scoped PR-style review, append-only evidence records, or independent revalidation of code findings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review PRs: diffs, inline comments via gh or REST.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.