5.5천건 · 관련도순
7-agent paper review system on Hermes Agent. 6 modes (full/re-review/quick/methodology-focus/guided/calibration). 5-panel review with editorial decision, revision roadmap, and calibration metrics. Uses delegate_task for each reviewer. Triggers: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, check revisions, calibrate reviewer, 審稿, 同儕審查, 論文審查.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build next-session A-share game plans from market structure, overnight macro shocks, policy timing, and watchlist leadership. Use when the user asks what A-shares may do tomorrow, which sectors may repair first, how to read the open, or wants a reusable pre-open discretionary decision workflow.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
>
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
>
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create a Beads-first refactor plan through detailed interview, repo verification, alternatives, scope boundaries, testing decisions, and tiny working increments. Use when the user wants to plan a refactor, write a refactoring RFC, or turn a risky change into safe incremental work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Relentlessly stress-test a plan or design through a one-question-at-a-time interview that researches available context first and includes a recommended answer with every question. Use when the user asks to "grill me", wants a plan/design challenged, or needs decisions resolved before implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Stress-test a plan against existing domain language, code behavior, and durable decisions. Use when the user wants DDD/domain-model grilling, glossary refinement, terminology challenges, context documentation, ADR candidates, or plan validation against a repo's language.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and re-architecture of existing systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, technology selection, or data modeling decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert .NET backend architect specializing in C#, ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework, Dapper, and enterprise application patterns. Masters async/await, dependency injection, caching strategies, and performance optimization. Use PROACTIVELY for .NET API development, code review, or architecture decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for Private and Internal member testing strategies. Use when you need to test private or internal members, configure InternalsVisibleTo, or evaluate testability design. Covers design-first thinking, reflection testing, strategy pattern refactoring, AbstractLogger pattern, and decision frameworks. Keywords: private method testing, internal testing, InternalsVisibleTo, reflection testing, GetMethod BindingFlags, Meziantou.MSBuild.InternalsVisibleTo, testability design, strategy pattern refactoring, testability
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Selects a .NET UI framework. Decision tree across Blazor, MAUI, Uno, WinUI, WPF, WinForms.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decides how to test .NET code. Unit vs integration vs E2E decision tree, test doubles.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill provides symbol-level code understanding and navigation using Language Server Protocol (LSP). Enables IDE-like capabilities for finding symbols, tracking references, and making precise code edits at the symbol level.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Chooses inter-service protocols. REST vs gRPC vs SignalR vs SSE decision matrix, tradeoffs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Chooses a data access approach. EF Core vs Dapper vs ADO.NET decision matrix, tradeoffs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Chooses documentation tooling. Starlight, Docusaurus, DocFX decision tree, migration paths.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Start or resume a MYOT task by reading AGENTS.md, project_map.md, and history.md, archiving history.md when switching tasks, and preparing a concise current task snapshot.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use FIRST when someone asks for a new feature or a change to an existing one — before any schema, code or test. Works out what is actually being asked for, whether to build it or integrate a third party (Trustpilot, Stripe, Calendly and the like), where the data lives, who may do what, and what happens when the vendor is down. Produces a decision, then hands to feature-schema.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Extract decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises from completed phase artifacts
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Deploy Cisco Duo multi-factor authentication across enterprise applications, VPN, RDP, and SSH access points. This skill covers Duo integration methods, adaptive authentication policies, device trust
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.