568건 · 관련도순
ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill to understand when electronic records are acceptable to FMCSA inspectors. Covers PDF, original-format, and search-ability requirements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Synthesizes evidence-linked feedback from validation results, confidence evidence, and iteration triggers. Proposes bounded revision guidance for a stated acceptance failure. Activate on 'synthesize feedback', 'improvement suggestions', 'actionable feedback', 'iteration guidance', 'feedback generation'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Records and evaluates event-specific probability forecasts for agent outputs. NOT for validation or automatic acceptance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Codex Plan Mode 専用。docs/PLAN/{YYMMDD}_{slug}/ に schema v3 仕様書を作成する。 Gate 契約 (Goal / Constraints / Acceptance Criteria)、Mermaid 図、Cursor Agent 委任ヒントを含む。 Trigger: spec-codex
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a Spark change needs its authoritative owner, affected boundaries, risks, acceptance criteria, and smallest verifiable slice established before implementation or review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
受け入れ基準書を作成する。検収基準、完了条件の定義時に使う。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn vague Acceptance Criteria into measurable checks and test assertions
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
将抽象的Acceptance Criteria（Given-When-Then）转换为具体的数值示例和真实对话，让AC对PM/客户/测试人员更易懂。适合在AC编写完成后、准备测试或向客户展示时使用，当AC格式正确但过于抽象时。帮助不熟悉BDD的PM/BA/测试人员理解测试场景，让AC从抽象规则变成可直接用于手动测试的具体步骤。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Используйте, когда нужно прогнать BDD или acceptance contour через канонический test entrypoint проекта.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for non-trivial feature, behavior, workflow, or architecture work before execution planning. Create or update a versioned spec under planning/specs/active with design intent, alternatives, risks, acceptance criteria, and planning readiness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for non-trivial, design-bearing, or architecture-affecting work before execution planning. Creates or updates a versioned spec under planning/specs/active/ with design intent, alternatives, risks, and acceptance criteria.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate or materially revise a repository-local test plan, QA plan, acceptance matrix, or regression checklist on explicit request or when one concrete testability gap blocks formal DEFINE; do not trigger for ordinary implementation, test execution, TDD, review, or completion claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a Spark change needs its authoritative owner, affected boundaries, risks, acceptance criteria, and smallest verifiable slice established before implementation or review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cross-cutting methodology for the CVE-hunting pipeline (ported from find-cve-agent): when a bug is design-vs-real, false-positive avoidance, version checking before reporting, responsible disclosure norms, acceptance-rate expectations per vuln class, vulnerability chaining playbook, known false-positive patterns, maintainer-response patterns, secure-pattern reference (what NOT to flag), and a self-criticism checklist to run before claiming a finding. Use this alongside the cve-hunter/cve-exploiter/cve-validator agents and the /cve-hunt pipeline — load it whenever judging if a finding is real, worth reporting, or already fixed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.