'alignment' 검색 결과

Build a structured Quarterly Business Review deck for a customer account. Use when user says "QBR", "quarterly business review", "prep my QBR", "build the deck", "renewal prep", "executive check-in", "90-day review", or "customer business review" - even if they don't use the acronym. Applies to CSMs preparing for executive-level customer meetings focused on value delivered, health, and next quarter alignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Security-focused code review identifying high-confidence exploitable vulnerabilities with two-axis severity/confidence scoring, OWASP 2025 alignment, per-finding Haiku verification, and false positive filtering. Optional GitHub PR posting. Use when user runs /security-review, /review:security-review, requests a "security review", "security audit", "vulnerability scan", or mentions "find vulnerabilities", "check for exploits".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when defining or refining the tone, voice, and behavioral personality of an Agentforce agent: system instruction encoding, brand voice alignment, adaptive response formats, multi-persona strategies. NOT for writing the actual conversational copy — utterances, fallback messages, escalation phrasing — use admin/agent-conversation-design. NOT for topic scope design — use agentforce/agent-topic-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this whenever a downstream Vue project needs to absorb upstream Devkit Vue changes — triggers on "update stack", "sync with devkit", "merge upstream", "pull stack updates", "resolve stack conflicts". Two-phase: ISO merge (stack modules stay byte-identical to upstream) then project alignment (apply MIGRATIONS.md, diff project modules vs `tasks` reference, /verify). Stack-code failures get an issue on `pierreb-devkit/Vue`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive K-12 or higher-ed system analysis: predict student dropout risk with early warning indicators, optimize curriculum alignment and pacing, personalize learning paths for at-risk and diverse populations, and audit school operations for resource efficiency..

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit workforce skill gap identification systems and labor market alignment. Triggers: you need to evaluate skill taxonomy quality, individual and aggregate gap analysis accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a resume builder or optimization tool for ATS compatibility, keyword matching accuracy, formatting standards, achievement quantification, skill extraction, and job-description alignment scoring. Use when reviewing resume software, career platforms, applicant tracking integrations, CV generators, or job application tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze retail merchandising systems including planogram optimization (space-to-sales alignment, fair share index, sales per linear foot), visual merchandising effectiveness for in-store displays and e-commerce product pages, market basket analysis with association rule mining (Apriori.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a grant management system for proposal workflow efficiency, deadline tracking, budget-narrative alignment, outcome reporting, compliance readiness, and win rate optimization. Use when reviewing nonprofit grant software, building a grants CRM, analyzing proposal pipelines, or evaluating funder reporting tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantify cyber risk using FAIR methodology with Monte Carlo simulation, assess control effectiveness against NIST CSF/CIS/ISO 27001 frameworks, evaluate risk appetite alignment, and analyze cyber insurance coverage adequacy..

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze defense program budgets and acquisition costs — earned value management (EVM/CPI/SPI), should-cost modeling, PPBE process alignment, cost estimation per GAO guidelines, Nunn-McCurdy breach risk, FYDP profiles, and learning curve analysis. Audit DoD 5000 acquisition software, program cost databases, and budget justification systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit curriculum management software for learning outcome alignment, pacing guide optimization, standards coverage mapping (Common Core, NGSS, state standards), differentiation support, assessment design quality, and content gap detection across grade levels and subjects..

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze mental health care planning systems for treatment goal alignment, intervention scheduling, progress milestone tracking, multi-provider coordination, step-down/step-up criteria, and individualized care pathway optimization..

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position alignment, conflict resolution, documented sign-offs, FRAP 29/Rule 37.6 disclosures, FRAP 26.1 corporate disclosures, cover formatting for multiple amici, and compliant filing. Use when coordinating coalition amicus briefs, managing sign-offs, drafting joint friend-of-court briefs, handling multi-amici filing, or resolving inter-organization conflicts. Triggers on phrases like "coalition brief," "12 orgs joining this amicus," or "coordinate the amicus."

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when inspecting Blender characters, rigs, poses, animation retargeting, ground contact, facing direction, or model-vs-motion alignment where screenshots alone are not enough.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Capture meeting notes with clear structure: attendees, agenda, decisions, action items with owners and deadlines. Ensure accountability and alignment post-meeting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide for implementing and maintaining context as a managed artifact alongside code, enabling consistent AI interactions and team alignment through structured project documentation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Map Azure architectures and operations to security and compliance controls. Use this skill when users ask for governance, policy enforcement, audit readiness, or regulatory alignment. Covers ISO, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and custom compliance frameworks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decision-theoretic framework for agents embedded within the environments they model and act upon

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Matches natural language task descriptions to appropriate skills using semantic similarity. Handles fuzzy matching, intent extraction, and capability alignment. Activate on 'find skill', 'match task', 'semantic search', 'skill lookup', 'what skill for'. NOT for ranking matches (use dag-capability-ranker) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ranks skill matches by fit, performance history, and contextual relevance. Applies multi-factor scoring including success rate, resource usage, and task alignment. Activate on 'rank skills', 'best skill for', 'skill ranking', 'compare skills', 'optimal skill'. NOT for semantic matching (use dag-semantic-matcher) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.