'report' 검색 결과

App Store and Google Play submission automator with Fastlane, screenshot automation, metadata management, and TestFlight/internal testing. Activate on: app store submission, Fastlane, TestFlight, Google Play Console, screenshot automation, metadata management, app review, code signing, provisioning profiles. NOT for: CI/CD pipeline setup (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), app architecture (use react-native-architect), analytics (use mobile-analytics-crash-reporting-expert).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end Coval accent testing workflow. Creates one persona per accent (each using a distinct accent voice and mirroring your Standard Customer behavior), launches one run per accent against the same voice agent + test set + metrics, polls for completion, builds a per-persona comparison table from the results, and creates the saved multi-run report (grouped by Persona) via the public API. Use when a user wants to follow the Testing Across Accents cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/testing-across-accents) without doing each step by hand.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end Coval adversarial / red-team testing workflow. Builds one adversarial test set (12 core attack vectors plus legitimate controls, each with an expected-behavior checklist), creates a persistent "Adversarial User" persona and a Composite Evaluation metric that scores each scenario against its own expected behaviors, launches a multi-iteration run against the agent (voice or chat), polls for completion, builds a per-scenario pass/fail scorecard, and creates a saved report grouped by Test Case. Use when a user wants to follow the Adversarial & Red-Team Testing cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/adversarial-red-team-testing) without doing each step by hand. Triggers: "adversarial test set", "red team my agent", "jailbreak / prompt-injection testing", "test my agent against bad actors".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end Coval audio-quality testing workflow. Launches one run per audio-robustness scenario against the same voice agent + test set + metrics, polls for completion, and produces the multi-run report URL grouped by Persona. Use when a user wants to follow the Testing Across Audio Qualities cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/testing-across-audio-qualities) without doing each step by hand.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scheduled patrol that finds real persistence and error bugs and fixes them. Use when running the system-error repair patrol automation, or when stuck rows, SLA breaches, the system_errors queue, or app_log ERROR rows need a repair rather than a report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-commitment attack on a plan by an agent that did not write it. Use when presenting a feature-deep-dive plan, assigning vision-to-fleet briefs, moving a register to build mode, ratifying a scope list, or coding a new contract or table. NOT for built work or DONE reports (use subagent-dispatch).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Continuous localhost UI iteration loop with Arman, through full surface certification. Use when he asks to fix, refine, review, or iterate on a page, route, panel, overlay, or other UI while he may inspect localhost. NOT for a report-only UI audit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run the full on-track check on a conversation, project, or keyword the owner names: find the sessions, extract exactly what he typed, dispatch independent judges who go to the live product as him and report what was missed, plan the remedy, and return one page — what he will see, what is missing, the plan. Use when told to check whether work is on track, to audit a project that has drifted, on 'run the on-track check on X', or when a long campaign is about to freeze, hand off, or claim done.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The re-measure and standing report of the canonical data model's live DB conformance. Use when asked 'where are we at' on DB drift or conformance, to update the drift numbers, when a drift-audit brief is re-issued, or on /drift-audit. NOT the per-table fix recipe (use matrx-frontend's db-canonicalize-table).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Toolkit for styling artifacts with curated themes (slides, docs, reports, HTML landing pages, and more). Use when you need consistent typography and color systems or want to generate a new theme on the fly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Use when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go), and not for general debugging or non-security tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

課題のレポート・小論文部分を，出題文・採点基準の要求を過不足なく満たす形で執筆する．「レポートを書いて」「この設問に答えて」など，課題文書の執筆を求められたときに使う（既存文書の推敲だけなら /refine:docs を使う）．

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "PR を出す前に確認して", "check if this branch is ready to merge", "run pre-PR checks", "PRを作る前にチェックして", or wants to verify a branch before opening a pull request. Executes verification commands, validates Conventional Commits format, and confirms documentation is updated, then reports whether gh pr create is safe to run.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects code smells in PHP codebases. Identifies God Class, Feature Envy, Data Clumps, Long Parameter List, Long Method, Primitive Obsession, Message Chains, Inappropriate Intimacy. Generates actionable reports with refactoring recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use after implementing features - verifies each acceptance criterion with structured testing and posts verification reports to the GitHub issue

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes PHP codebase for SOLID principle violations. Detects God classes (SRP), type switches (OCP), broken contracts (LSP), fat interfaces (ISP), and concrete dependencies (DIP). Generates actionable reports with severity levels and remediation recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[61] VALIDATE. Comprehensive code quality check combining ESLint, TypeScript compilation, and unused code detection. Runs full lint suite with detailed error reporting and fix suggestions. Use before commits, after major changes, or when ensuring code quality standards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Sentry error tracking and monitoring for OneKey. Use when configuring Sentry, filtering errors, analyzing crash reports, or debugging production issues. Covers platform-specific setup (desktop/mobile/web/extension) and error filtering strategies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.