'drafting' 검색 결과

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

You MUST use this before any creative work — creating features, building components, drafting documents, designing workflows, or modifying behavior. Explores your human partner's intent, requirements, and design before any implementation begins.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Open Source License guidance, selection, compliance review, and drafting. Use this skill when users ask about choosing open source licenses, checking license compatibility, reviewing projects for OSS compliance, generating LICENSE/NOTICE files, or understanding specific license terms. Triggers include questions about MIT, Apache, GPL, BSD, LGPL, AGPL, copyleft, permissive licenses, license compatibility, SPDX identifiers, or any OSS licensing topic.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create bulletproof Terms of Service and Privacy Policy documents for SaaS applications. Infers company information from codebase/marketing site, conducts comprehensive audits, drafts documents, then asks user ONLY for missing details at the end. Minimizes user interaction. Use when the user needs to draft, review, or update legal documents (ToS, Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, legal pages). Triggers on requests for legal documents, terms drafting, privacy policy creation, "cover our bases legally", liability protection, or legal compliance for software products.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate production-ready business documents including freelance contracts, project proposals, SOWs, NDAs, and MSAs with jurisdiction-aware clauses. Covers US (Delaware), EU (GDPR), UK, and DACH (German law) legal frameworks. Includes contract templates, clause libraries, and DOCX conversion. Use when starting client engagements, writing proposals, drafting partnership agreements, or needing GDPR-compliant data processing addenda.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigate Azure incidents and service degradations with a read-only workflow using Azure CLI, Resource Health, Activity Log, metrics, resource logs, and official Microsoft docs. Use when troubleshooting Azure outages, Resource Health alerts, Azure Firewall or DNS failures, ExpressRoute or BGP instability, VM availability problems, AKS incidents, App Service failures, database connectivity issues, Entra ID sign-in problems, load balancer issues, platform-vs-workload cutover, or drafting a troubleshooting report. Triggers on 'Azure トラブルシューティング', '障害調査', '切り分け', 'Resource Health', '復旧確認', 'Azure Firewall', 'DNS', 'ExpressRoute', 'VPN Gateway', 'BGP', 'AKS', 'App Service', 'SQL', 'PostgreSQL', 'Cosmos DB', 'Entra ID', 'incident', 'degraded', 'unavailable'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-source research on a customer question or topic with source attribution. Use when a customer asks something you need to look up, investigating whether a bug has been reported before, checking what was previously told to a specific account, or gathering background before drafting a response.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Process call notes or a transcript — extract action items, draft follow-up email, generate internal summary. Use when pasting rough notes or a transcript after a discovery, demo, or negotiation call, drafting a customer follow-up, logging the activity for your CRM, or capturing objections and next steps for your team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Enterprise risk management (ERM) framework layer — integrates COSO ERM 2017 (five components, 20 principles), ISO 31000, three-lines model, risk appetite, risk heatmap, and key risk indicators (KRI) into a complete governance playbook covering structure through culture. Use for ERM implementation, risk-system build, risk mapping, risk-appetite statement drafting, three-lines setup, CRO role design, or Taiwan FSC corporate-governance evaluation response. Triggers: 『ERM 導入』『風險管理框架』『COSO』『風險地圖』『風險胃納』『KRI』『CRO 職責』『三道防線』『風險委員會』『ISO 31000』『風險熱圖』『風險治理』. For 師大／政大／陽交 EMBA risk-management/governance/audit cases. Complements Asgard `algo-risk-*` (Altman Z, Benford, credit, VaR) with the framework/governance layer. 獨董挑選/董事會組成/IPO 治理: use `biz-corporate-governance`.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master orchestrator for B2B SaaS content creation and the editorial production system behind it. Use this skill to produce blog articles, whitepapers, case studies, video scripts, newsletters and ghostwritten thought leadership, to develop content strategy, and to run the publishing line itself — content briefs, editorial calendars and production capacity, review and approval workflow, subject-matter-expert access, the style guide, an AI-drafting policy, and a content inventory with owners. Also triggers on: blog, article, copywriting, edit this copy, improve this landing page copy, fix this headline, tighten this paragraph, rewrite without losing our voice, case study, whitepaper, newsletter, video script, ghostwriting, content calendar, editorial, thought leadership, content strategy, content brief, content operations, content ops, editorial workflow, managing editor, who reviews this, our content pipeline is stuck, content is stuck in review, content audit, content inventory, content governance, style guide, house style, SME interview, expert interview, freelance writers, AI content policy, how much content can we actually produce. Also owns the customer academy and customer education: online courses, onboarding curriculum, tutorials, certification programs, digital credentials and badges, exam and pass-mark design, course freshness when the product UI changes, and whether the academy should sit behind a login. Triggers on: customer academy, customer education, online course, course library, learning path, curriculum, tutorial, certification program, certified users, digital badge, Open Badges, recertification, exam, pass mark, LMS, Skilljar, our tutorial shows the old UI, our course is out of date, should the academy be gated, do certified customers renew better.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when planning, drafting, revising, compressing, or auditing conference rebuttals and author responses in OpenReview Markdown or PDF. Supports exact reviewer mapping, evidence and experiment integration, guided risk decisions, venue-format validation, and blind reviewer/AC audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when creating or drafting DLS (Lumen team) Jira tickets: a bug, a task, or an epic broken down from a tab of the Lumen scope spreadsheet. Holds the DLS project conventions (title prefix, issue types, epics, labels) and the ticket templates. Also the source of truth for finding the current sprint's tickets.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental engineer — designing or sizing a wastewater/water treatment process, drafting or reviewing an NPDES or Title V air permit application, scoping a contaminated-site remediation (RI/FS), evaluating whether a process change triggers a permit modification, or checking a discharge/emissions dataset against regulatory limits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an executive administrative assistant — triaging a stacked calendar against competing priorities, deciding what reaches an executive versus what gets redirected, reconciling a multi-city travel itinerary or expense report, drafting on an executive's behalf within a delegated-authority boundary, or handling a scheduling conflict across time zones.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental scientist — scoping or reviewing a Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessment, interpreting soil or groundwater sampling results against regulatory action levels, drafting an environmental impact statement or NEPA scoping document, running a contaminant fate-and-transport screening calc, or assessing ecological risk to a receptor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Restoration Planner — screening or comparing CERCLA/RCRA remedial alternatives against the nine evaluation criteria, building a life-cycle cost estimate for a Feasibility Study, scoping a stream or wetland restoration design against a reference reach, sizing compensatory mitigation credits, drafting a Statement of Work or Remedial Action Work Plan, or scoping a Five-Year Review for a site with land-use controls in place.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Customer Service Representative — de-escalating an angry customer, deciding whether a policy exception is worth the cost, deciding when to escalate versus resolve on the spot, drafting a resolution response, or diagnosing why first-call-resolution is low for an issue type.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a museum or gallery curator — evaluating whether to accept a donated collection or object, writing an acquisition or deaccession recommendation, resolving a provenance or repatriation question, deciding a loan request, or drafting exhibition label copy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a detective/criminal investigator — developing and stress-testing a case theory against alternate explanations, reconciling conflicting timestamps (DVR, cell tower, witness-reported) into a defensible timeline, structuring a suspect/witness interview using a non-accusatorial method, drafting a probable-cause affidavit, or evaluating whether a confession or eyewitness identification is being treated with the right level of certainty.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Diagnostic Medical Sonographer — deciding whether a duplex, compression, or graded-compression ultrasound study is diagnostic versus technically limited, choosing when to interrupt a scanning protocol to escalate a real-time critical finding, setting scan technique and ALARA (TI/MI) parameters for a given exam type, or drafting the technical worksheet and preliminary findings a physician will interpret and sign.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Court Reporter — producing a realtime or CART feed during a deposition or trial, triaging a QC pass on a draft transcript before certification, drafting or applying an errata sheet under FRCP 30(e), reading back testimony from steno notes on a judge's request, or handling a sealed-record or in-camera confidentiality flag.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.