'argument' 검색 결과

Turn research code and experimental results into ML and AI paper drafts. The skill guides argument structure, reference verification, and conference formatting with LaTeX templates, helping researchers revise drafts and prepare submissions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting a paper from research code and results
• Clarifying the main contribution and supporting evidence
• Finding and verifying references for related work

Import text, files, URLs, repositories, and database content into cognee memory. This skill explains input handling, storage organization, extraction options, and cost estimates, while helping diagnose unsupported arguments and document update errors.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Importing documents, URLs, or database content
• Organizing stored information by project or topic
• Estimating tokens and cost before importing

Research a topic from multiple angles, preserve sources according to your privacy preferences, and summarize each one. Combine the evidence into a self-contained reference page, including limitations and counterarguments, with options to deepen the research later.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Building a reference guide on a new topic
• Keeping sources alongside individual summaries
• Comparing evidence, counterarguments, and limitations

Analyzes supplied books, articles, PDFs, and document sets by separating claims, evidence, assumptions, and objections. Produces argument maps and traceable evidence records, with reading modes that also support whole-book understanding, explanation practice, and recall.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Tracing an article's claims to their supporting evidence
• Organizing concepts and relationships into a knowledge map
• Explaining material from memory to find gaps in understanding

Implement or modify GitButler’s but commands using its established structure. It covers typed arguments, input validation, execution, and human-readable, shell, or JSON output, while keeping operations usable from the terminal interface.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Add a new but command
• Define arguments for branches and commits
• Separate input validation from execution

Stress-test ideas, strategies, and plans by breaking them into individual claims for parallel expert agents to challenge. Receive the strongest supporting case, surviving counterarguments, and findings ranked by severity with suggested ways to address weaknesses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Challenge assumptions in a business strategy
• Find weaknesses in a software architecture proposal
• Prepare strong objections to a pricing decision

Coordinate four AI researchers to examine a company's business, finances, competition, and management risks in parallel. Combine sourced findings into an investment report with valuation checks, arguments for and against investing, and suggested price ranges.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Researching a company from four perspectives in parallel
• Comparing arguments for and against an investment
• Checking valuations against financial data

Add or improve Google-style docstrings, the explanations embedded in Python code, for modules and classes. Document constructor arguments, public methods, configuration fields, and enum values while preserving existing documentation that already meets the project’s conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Document a Python module
• Explain constructor arguments and public methods
• Describe configuration fields and enum values

Create tests for Convex functions with convex-test and vitest, using a backend that runs in memory. Check arguments, return values, authentication, indexes, errors, and scheduled functions without relying on real time or network access.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Test Convex function arguments and return values
• Check behavior with different authentication identities
• Cover errors as well as successful requests

Call Yao processes to query data models or run scripts. Check which operations are permitted, inspect their required arguments through the documentation workflow, and execute a process using its full name.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check which Yao processes are permitted
• Query records through a data model
• Run a named Yao script

Look up callable processes in Yao, inspect their arguments and return types, and check whether a process name is valid. Use the documentation to prepare calls and find suggested alternatives for misspelled names.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find Yao processes by keyword
• Check arguments and return types before calling a process
• Validate process names when a call fails

Generate a report with predictable output for acceptance tests of disposable executors, or temporary task runners. Retrieve agent settings, run the supplied report script with specified arguments, and publish the resulting file to S3.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Generating a report for disposable executor acceptance tests
• Checking report output with specified arguments
• Publishing a verification report to S3

Draft or restructure scientific manuscripts using Nature-style argument patterns, starting from supplied results, figures, notes, or Chinese drafts. It organizes sections, connects claims to evidence, and identifies missing inputs while keeping conclusions within the research's demonstrated limits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting an abstract from research results and figures
• Rebuilding an introduction around the research gap
• Turning Chinese research notes into English manuscript prose

Investigate GraphQL APIs for unauthorized data access, unsafe updates, and permission inconsistencies with REST APIs. The skill covers schema discovery, checks across users and organizations, and validation steps that turn suspected weaknesses into reproducible findings with concrete impact.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Map GraphQL schemas and sensitive operations
• Check access boundaries between users and organizations
• Compare permission changes across REST and GraphQL

Draft and revise research papers, thesis sections, and responses to reviewers, primarily in Chinese or in English on request. Organize arguments around supplied evidence while preserving formulas, citations, terminology, and measured results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting abstracts and introductions from research notes
• Improving logic and wording in thesis manuscripts
• Preparing responses to peer reviewers

Review Quarto manuscripts against APSA style rules for political science. Get a separate report grouped by document section, with suggested changes and explanations for numbers, capitalization, citations, terminology, and neutral language, while preserving the source.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking a political science manuscript against APSA style
• Reviewing citation wording and number formatting
• Flagging potentially biased language

Proofread English academic prose in Quarto .qmd documents for grammar, typos, punctuation, and clarity. Receive a separate Markdown report organized by section, with suggested revisions and reasons, while keeping the source file unchanged.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Proofreading English academic papers written in Quarto
• Reviewing only a section identified by its Quarto label
• Checking prose in figure captions and document metadata

Review prose in Quarto manuscript files for clutter, weak verbs, inconsistent voice, and unclear explanations using William Zinsser’s writing principles. Receive a separate Markdown report with section-based recommendations and reasons, while the source file remains unchanged.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Finding wordy expressions in an academic manuscript
• Reviewing only the introduction
• Checking section openings and conclusions

Review academic slide decks or audit empirical analysis pipelines. It checks slide arguments, layout, and compilation, or reproduces numerical results in R, Stata, and Python to diagnose discrepancies and produce a formal report with prioritized recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing academic slide arguments and layout
• Checking LaTeX compilation warnings
• Comparing empirical results across R, Stata, and Python

Review econometric code, proofs, data workflows, and outputs with multiple specialist agents. Assess identification—the assumptions that let data establish an effect—alongside estimation, numerical stability, and reproducibility, then consolidate findings into prioritized tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking estimation code and standard errors
• Examining assumptions behind identification arguments
• Reviewing proofs and derivations before submission

Guide Claude Code to check files, documentation, data, and execution results before presenting answers. The skill sets verification steps for coding, analysis, and writing, including checking citations and numbers, diagnosing errors, and clearly stating what cannot be verified.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking function names and arguments before coding
• Inspecting data columns and file paths before analysis
• Verifying row counts and missing values after joins

Work through predicate logic problems by examining quantifiers, which express “all” or “some,” organizing formulas, and choosing proof steps. The skill also guides resolution proofs and countermodels that show why an argument is invalid.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking quantifier scope and variable binding
• Converting formulas to prenex normal form
• Planning a resolution proof

Create reusable Claude Code prompts that users invoke with slash commands. Explains project and personal command files, arguments, file references, and Bash output so recurring tasks such as code reviews and commit message drafting have reusable templates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning repeated requests into slash commands
• Creating shared project review templates
• Drafting commit messages from Git changes

Guides authorized OS command injection testing by defining scope, alternative investigation paths, and evidence requirements. Helps agents document direct, blind, and argument injection findings and report inconclusive results without overstating what the evidence proves.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Defining the scope of command injection testing
• Reviewing investigation paths when responses are absent
• Organizing reproduction evidence and execution privileges