'convergence' 검색 결과

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-skill signal detector - finds entities or themes surfaced independently by 3+ different skill categories within 48h and surfaces them as high-confidence write opportunities

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates 3-5 divergent design directions through JTBD analysis, competitive research, structured brainstorming, and taste evaluation before convergence. Use when the team has a validated problem but hasn't chosen a solution approach.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validate and optimize vArmor EnhanceProtect policies. Use for policy review, creation, observation, or convergence. Explain the workflow first when the user is exploring it. Not for DefenseInDepth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Remove the discourse-level (structural) signs of AI writing that survive surface editing: stated lessons and moral-of-the-story closers, tidy single-track arcs, embodied-emotion performance ("chest tightened"), vague allusions instead of named references, unbroken linear structure, and shape convergence across pieces. Grounded in the StoryScope study (Russell et al. 2026): narrative structure alone detects AI text at 93.2% F1, and professional stylistic rewriting moved detection only 1.6 points. Use as the SECOND pass after the humanizer skill (which handles words and phrasing) whenever writing or revising LinkedIn posts, course lessons, blog posts, essays, newsletters, or emails that must read as human. Triggers: "humanize", "de-slop", "AI tells", "make this sound human", "structural pass", "deep humanize".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Polishes working code through successive quality passes in fresh subagents. Use after tests pass when code needs multi-dimension refinement before release.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create original short videos using the 跨媒介角色集结｜五个独立风格模块最终共享同一舞台 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create original short videos using the 双系统碰撞｜同时证明两种规则 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create original short videos using the 墨烟试装升级｜日常基线、遮挡换装与黑白合流 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Train ML models with scikit-learn, PyTorch, TensorFlow. Use for classification/regression, neural networks, hyperparameter tuning, or encountering overfitting, underfitting, convergence issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Finite Element Analyst. Use when a task calls for Finite Element Analyst judgment. Reasons from discretization error, element technology, and constraint physics; runs mesh convergence and Richardson studies, Nastran/Abaqus/ANSYS workflows, RBE2/RBE3 and contact discipline, and ASME V&V 10 verification-before-validation reporting on governing QoIs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Electromagnetics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Electromagnetics Engineer judgment. Reasons from Maxwell scaling and S-parameters through HFSS/CST/ADS workflows, SOLT/TRL calibration, mesh ΔS convergence, Smith-chart matching, anechoic OTA, and CISPR/FCC Part 15 / IEC-IEEE 62209-1528 SAR compliance while treating PML reflections, probe de-embedding, and chamber ripple as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Computational Chemist. Use when a task calls for Computational Chemist judgment. Reasons from Kohn–Sham DFT, def2/D4 functional selection, and conformer ensembles through VASP/Gaussian/ORCA, AMBER/GROMACS MD, CREST/CENSO sampling, ONIOM/QM/MM electrostatic embedding, GMTKN55 validation, and SCF convergence escalation while treating B3LYP/6-31G*, BSSE, link-atom artifacts, and force-field mismatch as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Append-only gap closure and the cadence engine for research theses. Evaluates artifact CURRENT state (never git history, never task checkboxes) against current pins and wrong_if falsifiers, then appends a Convergence section to tasks.md re-proposing the gaps. A clean run leaves tasks.md byte-identical. Deterministic gaps (stale, invalidated) are uncapped; judgment-class gaps are capped per spec 046 Q40.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run Bayesian phylogenetic analysis with MrBayes, BEAST2, RevBayes, and PhyloBayes including MCMC convergence diagnostics and model comparison. Use when needing posterior probability support, Bayesian model averaging, site-heterogeneous models for deep phylogenies, or formal model comparison via stepping-stone sampling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when code has gone through repeated rework and may contain redundant logic, style drift, or tangled structure. Trigger when user asks for "返工收敛", "cleanup-pass", or requests a focused cleanup pass that reduces churn without changing behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when changing web CSS/UI styling so requirements, state ownership, and acceptance checks are locked before edits to prevent rework churn.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when reasoning about deep tech commercialization, biomedical engineering, drug delivery, material design, or overcoming institutional skepticism. Robert Langer, MIT professor and pioneer of drug delivery systems, approaches problems through first-principles engineering, interdisciplinary convergence, and relentless perseverance against consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user is evaluating high-risk/high-reward research, deciding between incremental vs. paradigm-shifting impact, spinning out academic discoveries into startups, or designing physical/biological systems from scratch. Apply his frameworks to navigate patenting, funding, and translating lab science into real-world impact.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Develop a limit-based product strategy with convergence milestones, acceleration levers, assumptions, and phased execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Spec↔code convergence scan. Use after implementation to verify the ACTUAL codebase matches the spec/plan — detects missing backends, dead buttons, partial wiring, scope creep. Classifies gaps (missing/partial/contradicts/unrequested), appends remediation tasks, loops until converged. The direct answer to 'the UI renders but nothing works' syndrome.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Calculus, series, numerical methods, and optimization for computational mathematics. Covers limits (epsilon-delta, L'Hopital, squeeze theorem), derivatives (rules, optimization, related rates), integrals (Riemann sums, Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, integration techniques), series (convergence tests, Taylor and Maclaurin expansions), differential equations (separable, linear, exact), numerical methods (Newton-Raphson, Euler method, Simpson's rule), and computational pitfalls (floating-point arithmetic, catastrophic cancellation, numerical stability). Use when computing derivatives, integrals, limits, series, solving differential equations, or analyzing numerical accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive research corpus covering 40+ agentic coordination protocols and ecosystems (MCP, A2A, ANP, UCP, ACP, AGNTCY, NANDA, FIPA, WoT, etc.) with emphasis on identity architectures, governance bodies, and interoperability convergence patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.