125건 · 관련도순
Gathers knowledge from web and files, cross-references across multiple sources, and produces cited research documents. Use when investigating technologies, patterns, or decisions that need evidence backing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user is explicitly working with Quarto, .qmd files, _quarto.yml, Quarto projects, or Quarto features such as callouts, cross-references, citations, Mermaid diagrams, extensions, websites, books, presentations, and reports. Also use for explicit migration from or comparison with R Markdown, bookdown, blogdown, xaringan, distill, or Jupyter notebooks to Quarto. Do not use for general R Markdown or related-format questions unless Quarto or migration to Quarto is explicitly mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review test code for quality, design, and completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug. Use when the user asks to "review my tests", "check my test quality", "are these tests good enough", "review testing", or after completing a feature implementation that includes tests. Also use when tests feel brittle, flaky, or superficial. Cross-references production code to find coverage gaps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when analyzing binary structure, disassembling code, or decompiling functions. Deep static analysis via radare2 (r2) and Ghidra headless - function enumeration, cross-references (xrefs), decompilation, control flow graphs. Keywords - "disassemble", "decompile", "what does this function do", "find functions", "analyze code", "r2", "ghidra", "pdg", "afl"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validate any Lattice SKILL.md against all tier conventions — atoms, molecules, and refiners. Catches structural errors, broken cross-references, and convention violations before they reach the repo. If you just wrote or modified a Lattice skill file and haven't run this yet, run it now — manual review consistently misses the same categories of errors this skill is specifically designed to catch. Use when the user says 'validate this skill', 'check this skill', 'does this follow conventions', 'review this skill file', 'check my SKILL.md', or 'skill validate'. Reports PASS/FAIL with specific file-and-section findings and actionable fixes. Standalone — does not call other skills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Aggregate news from Google News, Tavily, and Exa to get comprehensive coverage of any topic. Cross-references multiple news sources, identifies publication velocity, detects emerging stories, and provides citation-ready news intelligence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Make technology decisions for every product capability by discovering existing assets, evaluating vendor-aligned options, and categorizing as Reuse/Extend/Build/Buy/Integrate/Research during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on "tech stack", "build or buy?", "what technologies?", "technical decisions", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "vendor constraint", "IBM-first", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions", "select tech stack". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and cross-references. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validates and registers new SoT IDs with cross-reference integrity. Triggers when creating BR-XXX, UJ-XXX, API-XXX, or CFD-XXX entries. Outputs formatted SoT entry with validated cross-references.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit project dependencies for outdated packages, security vulnerabilities, and breaking changes. Use when someone asks to "check for outdated packages", "audit dependencies", "find vulnerable dependencies", "plan dependency upgrades", "detect breaking changes", or "update npm packages safely". Analyzes package.json/lock files, cross-references changelogs, and produces ordered upgrade plans.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill to build academic-style .docx output: journal / conference / thesis chapters carrying formal citation style (APA, Chicago, IEEE, MLA), numbered equations, figure & table cross-references, footnotes/endnotes, bibliography, or multi-column journal layout. Trigger on: 'research paper', 'journal paper', 'conference paper', 'manuscript', 'thesis', 'APA', 'MLA', 'Chicago', 'IEEE two-column', 'bibliography', 'hanging indent', 'citation style', 'abstract + keywords', 'equation numbering', 'cross-reference', paper with footnotes/endnotes. Output is a single .docx.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guided, section-by-section GDD authoring for a single game system. Gathers context from existing docs, walks through each required section collaboratively, cross-references dependencies, and writes incrementally to file.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides writing Elixir documentation with @moduledoc, @doc, @typedoc, doctests, cross-references, and metadata. Use when adding or improving documentation in .ex files.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial spec-compliance PR review — cross-references diffs against approved specs, verifies runtime claims against source, detects competing PRs, audits scope/convention compliance. Use before merging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
NASA Systems Engineering methodology mapped to cloud operations. Use when planning, executing, verifying, or documenting OpenStack cloud infrastructure following NASA SP-6105 and NPR 7123.1 processes. Provides phase gate criteria, document templates, and cross-references for all 7 SE lifecycle phases applied to cloud deployment and operations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs end-stage QA on a finished figure and table set. Checks callouts, numbering, and cross-references, whether numbers in the text match the exhibits, self-contained captions and statistical notes, accessibility and production quality, and links to the SI and replication package. Values that could only be read off an image are marked for author verification rather than estimated. Use when preparing a submission. Design guidance during drafting belongs to figures and tables.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-stage QA for a finished figure and table set (callouts, numbering, cross-references, text-to-exhibit consistency, captions and notes, accessibility, SI and replication linkage). Use when preparing a submission.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation. Runs validation checks (cross-references, doc completeness, layer metadata, integration points), produces a findings report, and supports iterative fixes. Use when validating first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work is complete, or when improving layer docs/schema.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze git repository history to produce a codebase risk profile before code review. Probes repo size, runs 7 parallel git analysis pipelines (hotspots, bug magnets, bus factor, contributor momentum, firefighting frequency, newly added files), cross-references hotspots with bug magnets to identify high-risk files with primary owner annotation, and writes walkthrough/recon-report.md. Use before code review to prioritize reviewer attention, at the start of linear-walkthrough Phase 1 Discovery to weight file coverage, or when onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation across the check categories defined in its Evaluation Checklist — cross-references, doc completeness, knowledge-explorer layer filters, research entry metadata, integration points, and plan consistency. Produces a structured findings report and optionally applies safe fixes. Use when validating a first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work complete, auditing layer docs or schema, or running --dry-run to preview findings without changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Inserts, formats, and cross-references academic citations in docx. Invoke when user needs to insert references, fix citation order, add cross-reference hyperlinks, or reformat bibliography to Chinese (GB/T 7714) or international (IEEE/APA) standards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when reviewing the structure, ordering, coherence, and narrative flow of the book as a whole or across chapters. Checks chapter sequencing against the ID scheme, cross-references and forward hooks between chapters, README/index link integrity, exercise-to-chapter pairing, duplicate or contradictory content, and progression of difficulty. Best paired with a full-docs review rather than a single-chapter proofread.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Suggest content topics ranked by opportunity score. Analyzes GSC keyword data and cross-references with personas to find high-potential topics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user wants to validate the plugin, check integrity, verify cross-references, or before a release. Also use when the user says 'validate', 'check plugin', or 'verify'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.