91건 · 관련도순
Write a publication-ready article in one of three angles - a trending long-form piece, a watched-repo thesis, or a project-through-a-lens essay. Optional Replicate hero image with --visual.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Translates Chinese resumes and business texts into professional English, and adapts personal experiences into compelling MBA application essays with strict adherence to prompts and word counts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
한국어 블로그·장문 글을 12개 voice preset으로 작성하거나 다듬는다 — toss-tech-design (default), karrot-neighborly, brunch-maker-popular, naver-d2-engineering, biz-formal-report, academic-paper, journalism-broadsheet, kakao-warm-product, line-global-saas, academic-lecture-essay, emotional-brand, legal-disclosure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
한국어 블로그·장문 글을 12개 voice preset으로 작성하거나 다듬는다 — toss-tech-design (default), karrot-neighborly, brunch-maker-popular, naver-d2-engineering, biz-formal-report, academic-paper, journalism-broadsheet, kakao-warm-product, line-global-saas, academic-lecture-essay, emotional-brand, legal-disclosure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user wants to humanize text, trim slop, de-AI or de-slop writing, remove AI tells, fix robotic or ChatGPT-sounding prose, or make writing sound human and natural. Also run before delivering a CV, cover letter, email, report, or essay to be sent. Removes 71 documented AI-writing patterns with a local detector, preserves numbers, names and citations, and rebuilds toward a human voice rather than a flat husk. Mode-aware, so it never fabricates voice on factual content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Remove the discourse-level (structural) signs of AI writing that survive surface editing: stated lessons and moral-of-the-story closers, tidy single-track arcs, embodied-emotion performance ("chest tightened"), vague allusions instead of named references, unbroken linear structure, and shape convergence across pieces. Grounded in the StoryScope study (Russell et al. 2026): narrative structure alone detects AI text at 93.2% F1, and professional stylistic rewriting moved detection only 1.6 points. Use as the SECOND pass after the humanizer skill (which handles words and phrasing) whenever writing or revising LinkedIn posts, course lessons, blog posts, essays, newsletters, or emails that must read as human. Triggers: "humanize", "de-slop", "AI tells", "make this sound human", "structural pass", "deep humanize".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Draft, rewrite, or review reader-facing prose so it is specific, useful, and recognizably the author's without inventing facts or performing humanness. Use for essays, articles, newsletters, documentation, talks, launch copy, and other important prose that feels generic, hollow, or AI-shaped. Supports co-write, rewrite, review, and lint modes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when an agent is asked to draft, rewrite, edit, review, polish, copyedit, simplify, humanize, or create written prose, including creative writing, essays, posts, scripts, speeches, emails, documentation, product copy, and other style-sensitive text. Apply George Orwell's six rules and ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English as a plain-English discipline while preserving the user's intended meaning, audience, tone, and explicit constraints.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Написание русскоязычной статьи или лонгрида с нуля: бриф, фактура, структура, черновик и самопроверка по методу Людмилы Сарычевой. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write, outline, structure, draft, assemble, or turn notes/interviews/materials into a Russian article, newsletter essay, longread, case, guide, or expert text. Триггеры: «напиши статью», «собери лонгрид», «напиши текст для блога про…», «есть интервью с экспертом, сделай статью», «составь план статьи», «придумай структуру», «собери материал», «сделай черновик», «напиши колонку», «из интервью в статью», «план лонгрида», «текст с нуля», «помоги написать материал». Для коротких постов в соцсети см. skill post; для правки готового текста — redaktura; для текстов интерфейса — ux-copy; для настройки проекта — redpolitika.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end content creation pipeline from research through editorial review to social distribution. Orchestrates a 3-stage workflow: research, draft/edit, and distribute. Supports blog posts, LinkedIn, Twitter threads, newsletters, and essays.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Most startup ideas are bad. Not because founders lack creativity, but because they're solving invented problems instead of lived ones. Paul Graham's essays reveal a pattern: the best ideas come from living in the future and noticing what's missing. Schlep blindness hides gold. Organic ideas beat brainstormed ones. Frighteningly ambitious ideas are often easier. This skill synthesizes PG's idea-finding wisdom into actionable guidance. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Founders face unique challenges in how they work. Maker vs manager schedule conflicts. Default alive vs dead math. Time and money slowly leaking away. Effective founders develop systems for navigating these challenges. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder productivity and decision-making into an operating system for founder effectiveness. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
What makes founders succeed? Paul Graham has observed thousands of founders and distilled patterns. Relentlessly resourceful. Fierce nerds. Earnest. These traits matter more than credentials or connections. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder character into actionable guidance for developing the traits that predict success. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Legendary blog writing that makes readers forget they're reading. This skill combines the narrative mastery of Paul Graham's essays, the technical accessibility of Julia Evans, the conversational wit of Wait But Why, and the viral mechanics of James Clear. Great blog posts don't inform—they transform. They take complex ideas and make them feel obvious. They turn strangers into superfans. They get shared not because someone should read them, but because someone needs to read them. This skill adapts to any topic: cybersecurity that reads like a thriller, AI explainers that feel like conversations, marketing insights that make you screenshot every paragraph, and coding tutorials that make you excited to build. Use when "write a blog post, blog post about, write an article, create content about, explain this topic, write about, long-form content, thought leadership, technical blog, how-to article, tutorial post, educational content, industry analysis, opinion piece, newsletter content, make this engaging, write for developers, explain like, writing, blog, content, articles, long-form, storytelling, technical-writing, thought-leadership, educational, tutorials, explainers, engagement" mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
企业财务与 CFO 视角 (企业财务与 CFO 视角 (Corporate Finance & the CFO Lens) — 面向创业公司与中小企业主/创始人/业务负责人的『看懂钱、管住钱、用好钱』的财务判断,不是考注会/中级职称的准则背诵,也不是投行卖方并购执行或 VC 投资人的看项目视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **利润是观点,现金是事实(权责发生制下的利润由收入确认时点、折旧摊销年限、存货计价、资本化与费用化的选择拼出来,是一组可辩论的判断;银行户头的钱是唯一不能辩论的事实——所以 CFO 看三张表的顺序是现金流量表→资产负债表→利润表,与外行相反) ⇄ 增长本身要烧钱(账面盈利的公司照样会因营运资金被增长吸干而倒闭:先付供应商、后收客户钱,规模越大缺口越大,这是『增长性破产』;所以现金转换周期比毛利率更早预警) ⇄ 记账合规派 vs 管理决策派(一套账是给税局与审计看的准则语言,另一套视图是给经营者看的贡献边际与单位经济;同一笔成本在两种语言里归属不同,把合规科目直接拿来做定价决策是中小企业最常见的错) ⇄ 全成本分摊 vs 贡献边际(把固定成本按产量分摊进单件成本,会在淡季得出『卖一件亏一件所以停产』的错误结论;边际思维只问增量收入是否覆盖增量成本,但长期只看边际会让公司永远收不回固定成本) ⇄ 预算是承诺 vs 预算是地图(传统年度预算把数字变成考核契约,导致部门年底突击花钱与藏预算;滚动预测与超越预算派主张预算只是当前最好的猜测,该月月刷新) ⇄ 融资是里程碑 vs 融资是负债(融资新闻稿把估值当成绩,但优先股、优先清算权、对赌与回购条款让创始人在低价退出时可能一分不拿;自筹派认为最便宜的钱是客户的预付款) ⇄ 估值方法之争(DCF 的数学严谨但对增长率与折现率假设极敏感,业内讥为『垃圾进垃圾出』;可比公司倍数简单但把市场情绪打包进来;早期公司两者都不成立,实际靠谈判与稀释目标倒推) ⇄ EBITDA 是不是有用(PE 与并购圈把它当经营现金流代理,巴菲特与芒格公开斥其忽略了折旧背后真实的资本开支;调整后 EBITDA 的『加回』项在业内被视为高危信号) ⇄ 财务是记分员 vs 财务是业务伙伴(传统财务事后出报表,财务 BP/FP&A 主张财务应在决策前进场做定价、投产、招人的经济性测算) ⇄ 中国中小企业的两套账现实 vs 合规红线(金税四期与社保入税之后,业内公认的做法是尽早并账,但这条张力必须如实呈现而不是装作不存在,也绝不给出规避税收的操作建议)); (b) 工具栈(记账层与决策层是两套东西) — 记账与 ERP(用友、金蝶、Odoo、QuickBooks、Xero、NetSuite、SAP Business One)、中国财税合规(电子税务局、金税四期发票与进销项比对、百望/航天信息电子发票、慧算账等代账 SaaS、个税与社保申报)、FP&A 与预算(Excel 与 Google Sheets 仍是绝对主力,之上是 Cube、Causal、Jirav、Mosaic、Runway、Abacum、Pigment、Anaplan、Planful)、现金流预测(Float、Fathom、13 周滚动现金流模板)、股权与 cap table(Carta、Pulley、AngelList、Excel 稀释模型,中国的股权代持与持股平台)、订阅计费与收入确认(Stripe Billing、Chargebee、Maxio)、费控报销(Ramp、Brex、Expensify、汇联易、分贝通)、BI 与看板(Power BI、Tableau、Metabase、帆软)、以及最被低估的纸笔工具(一页纸的驱动因素模型、贡献边际表、13 周现金日历)—— 选型的真正分岔是『公司在哪个阶段、由谁来维护这个模型』,不是厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 三张表的勾稽关系(利润表的净利经现金流量表调整后落到资产负债表的未分配利润)、权责发生制与收付实现制的差、现金转换周期 CCC 与 DSO/DIO/DPO、营运资金与增长的耦合、贡献边际与盈亏平衡点、经营杠杆与固定成本结构、单位经济与 LTV/CAC 及回本周期、烧钱率与现金跑道 runway、自由现金流与业主收益 owner earnings、资本成本与机会成本、净现值与内部收益率、投入资本回报率 ROIC 与增长的价值条件(只有 ROIC 高于资本成本时增长才创造价值)、股权稀释与优先清算权的退出瀑布、递延收入是负债不是收入; (d) 工作流/SOP — 月度关账与管理报表包(关账日历、计提、对账、出具一页纸经营分析)、13 周滚动现金流预测的搭建与每周刷新、年度预算与滚动预测(自上而下目标与自下而上驱动因素模型的对撞)、定价与成本核算(标准成本、作业成本法、贡献边际定价与报价审批)、应收账款与账期管理(信用政策、账龄表、催收节奏、保理与供应链金融)、融资轮次建模(投前投后估值、期权池扩容对创始人的额外稀释、SAFE 与可转债转股、优先清算权下的退出分配)、投资决策与产能/招人测算(增量现金流、回收期、敏感性分析)、税务合规日历与汇算清缴、董事会与投资人财务包、尽调与数据室准备、以及财务模型的三表联动搭建; (e) 知识正典(en 一手极厚,中文一手集中在高校教授与准则原文) — 《Financial Intelligence》Berman & Knight(给非财务经理的入门标准)、《Financial Statements》Thomas Ittelson、Brealey·Myers·Allen《Principles of Corporate Finance》(公司金融教科书)、Damodaran 的估值三部曲与《Narrative and Numbers》及其 NYU 公开课与免费数据集、《Simple Numbers, Straight Talk, Big Profits!》Greg Crabtree(中小企业实操)、《Venture Deals》Feld & Mendelson(条款与稀释)、《Financial Shenanigans》Howard Schilit(识别财务粉饰)、《The Outsiders》Thorndike(资本配置)、《Accounting for Value》Penman、伯克希尔股东信中的业主收益与商誉摊销讨论、《The Essays of Warren Buffett》、《Profit First》Michalowicz(流行但有争议)、IFRS 15/16 与 ASC 606 收入与租赁准则原文、中国企业会计准则 CAS 与小企业会计准则、肖星《一本书读懂财报》与清华的财务分析公开课、张新民的财务报表分析体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — Aswath Damodaran(NYU,估值教父,博客与公开课与数据集全免费开放,一手素材极厚)、Michael Mauboussin(ROIC 与资本配置的实证写作)、Howard Schilit(财务舞弊识别)、Karen Berman 与 Joe Knight(财务素养普及)、Greg Crabtree(中小企业现金与利润实操)、Brad Feld 与 Jason Mendelson(创业融资条款)、David Skok 与 Jason Lemkin 与 David Sacks(SaaS 单位经济与烧钱效率指标)、Warren Buffett 与 Charlie Munger(对 EBITDA 与股权激励费用化的著名批评)、CJ Gustafson 等现役 CFO 的时事通讯作者、以及中文圈的肖星与张新民等高校学者; (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — 调整后 EBITDA 与非公认会计准则指标的滥用(把股权激励与一次性费用年年加回)、DCF 对假设的极端敏感与被用来事后合理化结论、独角兽估值与优先清算权造成的『纸面身价』幻觉、对赌与回购条款把股权融资变成隐性债务、Profit First 现金分桶法被专业会计批评为回避真实成本结构、作业成本法的实施失败率高、预算游戏与年底突击花钱、财务 BP 沦为报表美化、中国中小企业两套账的历史现实与金税四期后的合规收敛(如实呈现风险,不提供规避操作)、以及『融资额等于成功』的媒体叙事对创始人的误导; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **准则与合规派(IASB/FASB/财政部,信可比性与审计留痕,语言是准则条文)** vs **管理会计/决策派(IMA 与贡献边际、作业成本法、有效产出会计,信决策相关性高于合规一致性)** vs **公司金融/估值派(Brealey-Myers-Allen 与 Damodaran,信现金流折现与资本成本)** vs **价值投资/资本配置派(巴菲特-芒格-Thorndike-Mauboussin,信业主收益与 ROIC,公开鄙视 EBITDA)** vs **创业与 SaaS 指标派(Skok-Lemkin-Sacks-Bessemer,信单位经济、回本周期与烧钱倍数)** vs **中小企业现金实操派(Crabtree、Profit First 一脉,信老板看得懂的少数几个数)**。不含: 投行卖方并购执行与尽调建模(已由 investment-banking-mna 覆盖)、VC 投资人的看项目与投后视角(已由 vc-investor 覆盖)、个人理财与二级市场投资(已由 personal-investing 覆盖)、注册会计师考证与准则条文背诵、以及任何税收规避操作建议。) Master O
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Load at the start of any task whose deliverable is prose another person will read — a PR description, commit message, README, doc, postmortem, blog post, issue or review comment, report, release note or essay — before drafting it, whether the result is pushed, posted, published or saved to a file, without being asked. Draft, then run this pass on the draft before handing it over. Also use when someone says "de-claude", "de-slop", "humanize this", "this reads like AI", "make it sound human", or asks for a voice, tone or register edit. Rewrites the constructions that mark prose as model-written (staged reveals, verdict headers, aphoristic closers, "it's not X, it's Y", em-dash drama, forced triads, flat-certainty adverbs) into plain technical prose and checks the rewrite kept every claim. Not for fiction, poetry, code, or quoted text; for a full adversarial review of a deliverable use challenging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Edit English prose for clarity, specificity, natural flow, and fit to the requested voice. Use for writing or revising articles, essays, posts, and other text that feels generic or padded.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rewrite existing text so it stops sounding AI-generated. Triggers on "humanize this", "un-ChatGPT it", "doesn't scream LLM", "strip the AI voice", or naming specific AI tells (em dashes, "it's not just X it's Y", "stands as a testament", "thrilled to announce", emoji-headed bullets, LinkedIn cringe). Works on any draft — blog posts, memos, READMEs, essays, PR descriptions — inline or in files. Keeps facts; changes voice. Do NOT use for writing new content, summarizing, translating, or pure-explanation requests with no draft to rewrite.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan, write, art-direct, generate, and package a coherent 2-10 image minimal-zine social series from notes, articles, photographs, travel stories, products, reviews, cultural topics, data, PDFs, or mixed subjects. Use for Xiaohongshu/小红书图片, Instagram carousels, social visual essays, recommendation posts, photo diaries, evidence-backed explainers, or any multi-image editorial sequence. Produces analysis, card roles, subject-aware composition, saved prompts, real raster images, natural caption copy, evidence provenance when needed, and series-level QA.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Paul Graham的思维框架与表达方式。基于200+篇essays、12个播客/访谈、 Twitter/X分析、7位核心批评者视角和完整人生时间线的深度调研， 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用PG的视角分析创业、写作、产品和人生选择。 当用户提到「用PG的视角」「Paul Graham会怎么看」「PG模式」「paul graham perspective」时使用。 即使用户只是说「帮我用PG的角度想想」「如果PG会怎么做」「切换到PG」也应触发。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create a writing scaffold teaching the genre conventions specific to an academic discipline. Use when students write lab reports, historical essays, or other discipline-specific text types.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Medium-native long-form research, author-assistance, writing, editing, review, topic discovery, publication matching, and packaging workflow. Use when creating, outlining, researching, revising, auditing, or packaging Medium stories, essays, tutorials, reviews, explainers, comparisons, case studies, publication submissions, Medium 长文, Medium 选题, Medium Topics, or Medium publishing packs that need original author perspective, narrative craft, relevant topics, responsible AI disclosure, and reader-centered distribution readiness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write Persian with Persian words. Use when writing, editing, translating or reviewing Persian (Farsi) prose — articles, documentation, posts, essays, UI copy — to replace loanwords with Persian equivalents while leaving technical terminology, proper nouns and code untouched. Also use when the user asks for پارسی سره, سرهنویسی, فارسیسازی, or "make this text more Persian".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write a kolu blog post grounded in the real build history — mine the Claude Code session logs behind a feature for the actual story (for large efforts, fan out over the transcripts with an ultracode workflow), draft it in the author's voice, and wire it into the Astro site. Use when asked to write a blog post or engineering essay about something that was built, especially one that should read as a narrative of what actually happened rather than invented marketing copy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.