'functional' 검색 결과

Compare behavior across multiple versions of programs or repositories. Use when you need to analyze how functionality changes between versions, identify regressions, compare outputs and exceptions, or validate upgrades. The skill compares execution behavior, test results, outputs, exceptions, and observable states across versions, generating detailed reports showing behavioral divergences, potential regressions, added/removed functionality, and areas requiring validation. Supports multiple programming languages and can work with test suites or execution traces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Convert code between programming languages while preserving functionality and semantics. Use when: (1) Translating functions, classes, or modules between languages (Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Rust, C/C++), (2) Migrating entire projects to a different language, (3) Need idiomatic translation that follows target language conventions, (4) Converting between different paradigms (OOP to functional, etc.), (5) Porting legacy code to modern languages. Provides language-specific patterns, idiomatic translation guides, and project migration strategies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Query InterPro for protein domains and families. Use when user asks about protein domains, functional sites, protein families, domain architecture, or motifs. Triggers on "interpro", "protein domain", "domain architecture", "protein family", "functional site", "motif".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill for the architecture phases of an MBSE workflow in MATLAB, when writing idempotent buildXxx.m scripts that produce a three-layer RFLPV architecture (Functional, Logical, Physical) with interface dictionaries, stereotype profiles, allocation sets, and requirements Implement links. Trigger for defining stereotype properties, functional-to-logical / logical-to-physical allocation, mapping requirements to components via slreq Implement links, or running quantitative roll-up analysis on the architecture. Do NOT trigger for ad-hoc structural edits to an already-built System Composer model (adding one component, rewiring a port) — use `building-simulink-models` with `model_edit` for that. Works alongside the `system-composer` skill for detailed SC API patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

🇺🇸 Your dev team ships features nobody asked for while user-reported bugs pile up for months. Operations blames engineering for ignoring users; engineering blames operations for not understanding technical constraints. This gives you the complete Product × Engineering × Operations alignment SOP — from unified backlog to 10-day sprint cadence to veto power rules. What's inside: • Dual-layer Kanban system (master backlog + sprint board with unified tagging) • 10-day sprint standard process (Day 1 dev → Day 6 testable build → Day 10 ship) • Issue template with reproducibility requirements (3x reported = auto-severe) • Tri-party alignment meetings (daily standup / sprint planning / sprint review) • Operations veto power on releases (P0 bug = block shipping) • User feedback → product iteration closed loop (beta testing + interview SOP) • Core metrics framework (acquisition → activation → retention → monetization → referral) • Technical debt management (20-30% sprint capacity reserved) • Ready-to-use templates: Bug Report, Sprint Planning, Responsibility Matrix Built from: Real product strategy meetings + beta testing frameworks. References Supabase sprint model, Manus/DeepSeek commercialization alignment. By @WeiYipei. 🇨🇳 你的研发团队在做没人要的新功能，用户反馈的 Bug 堆了三个月没人动。运营觉得研发不听用户，研发觉得运营不懂技术。这份 SOP 给你从统一看板到 10 天迭代节奏到一票否决权的完整产研运协同框架。 🇯🇵 開発チームは誰も求めていない機能を作り、ユーザーから報告されたバグは何ヶ月も放置。このSOPは、統一バックログから10日スプリント、リリース拒否権まで、プロダクト×エンジニアリング×オペレーションの完全な連携フレームワークを提供します。 🇰🇷 개발팀은 아무도 요청하지 않은 기능을 만들고, 사용자가 보고한 버그는 몇 달째 방치됩니다. 이 SOP는 통합 백로그부터 10일 스프린트, 릴리스 거부권까지 제품×개발×운영 완전 협업 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Triggers: "product ops" | "engineering operations" | "product development SOP" | "sprint planning" | "iteration management" | "cross-functional alignment" | "product engineering ops" | "dev ops collaboration" | "产研运协同" | "迭代管理" | "产品研发运营" | "プロダクト開発運営" | "제품개발운영"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Engineering design cycle covering requirements elicitation, specifications writing, constraint identification, iterative prototyping, and design communication. Spans the full loop from problem definition through ideation, analysis, prototyping, testing, and redesign. Includes morphological charts, TRIZ, Pugh matrices, design reviews, and the distinction between functional and non-functional requirements. Use when framing engineering problems, generating design alternatives, writing specifications, or running design reviews.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Carbon chemistry, functional groups, IUPAC nomenclature, isomerism, reaction mechanisms (substitution, elimination, addition), polymers, and biochemistry basics. Covers hydrocarbon classes (alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, aromatics), common functional groups (alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters, amines, amides), stereochemistry, condensation and addition polymerization, and the four biomolecule classes (carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, nucleic acids). Use when analyzing organic structures, predicting reaction products, or connecting chemistry to biology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs. Use when the task involves `test web application`, `test frontend`, `browser testing`, `Playwright test`, `capture browser screenshot`, `debug UI behavior`, or `verify frontend functionality`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Elixir and Phoenix expert including OTP, Ecto, and functional programming

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reorganize label-heavy or netlist-like electronic schematics into human-readable functional diagrams with visible local wiring while preserving proven connectivity. Use for schematic readability correction, overlapping wires or symbols, visually floating connectors or support logic, functional-sheet restructuring, bus presentation, layout annotations, or multi-EDA handoff across KiCad, Altium, EasyEDA, EAGLE/Fusion, gEDA/Lepton, SPICE/netlist, and PDF/image sources.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Auto-activates when analyzing GitHub issues to extract functional requirements, non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and user stories.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structural and functional brain connectivity — tractography, functional networks, and graph-theoretic analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Annotate genetic variants (GWAS hits, eQTLs, rare variants) with ENCODE functional data to interpret non-coding variation. Use when the user has variants of interest and wants to understand their regulatory context, identify causal variants from GWAS loci, assess variant impact on regulatory elements, perform enrichment testing of variant sets in tissue-specific annotations, or link variants to target genes through enhancer-gene maps. Handles the full post-GWAS workflow from variant set → tissue mapping → functional annotation → fine-mapping awareness → enrichment → variant-to-gene → prioritization. Use this skill for ANY variant interpretation task involving ENCODE chromatin, accessibility, TF binding, or 3D genome data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use ENCODE functional genomics data for disease mechanism research. Use when the user wants to connect GWAS variants to regulatory elements, annotate disease-associated loci with functional data, identify therapeutic targets from epigenomic data, build disease regulatory models, cross-reference with clinical trials and drug databases, or conduct any disease-focused, pathology-driven, or clinical variant interpretation workflow. Covers the full pipeline from disease-tissue mapping through GWAS variant annotation, heritability enrichment, cancer epigenomics, drug target identification, and clinical trial cross-referencing. Integrates ENCODE with Open Targets, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discover and characterize regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, silencers, insulators, super-enhancers) using ENCODE data and the cCRE catalog. Use when the user wants to find candidate regulatory elements, identify active enhancers in a tissue, map promoter states, classify chromatin states with ChromHMM, identify super-enhancers with ROSE, understand the functional validation hierarchy (CRISPR > MPRA > reporter), or characterize non-coding genomic regions. Covers the full workflow from ENCODE cCRE lookup through chromatin state segmentation to functional validation and enhancer-gene linkage. Use this skill for ANY regulatory element discovery, classification, or characterization task.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Estimates SNP heritability and partitions it across functional annotations, cell types, and loci from GWAS summary statistics or individual-level genotypes. Implements LDSC, stratified LDSC with the baseline-LD model, Finucane 2018 cell-type prioritization, LDAK SumHer, HDL, HESS local heritability, BOLT-REML, GCTA-GREML, graphREML, and Popcorn cross-population genetic correlation. Use when computing total h2_SNP from summary stats, partitioning heritability across functional categories, prioritizing trait-relevant tissues or cell types from ENCODE/Roadmap chromatin marks, reconciling LDSC vs LDAK enrichment estimates, computing local heritability with HESS, estimating genetic correlation between traits, or producing publication-grade enrichment with calibrated sensitivity to model assumptions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert-level organic chemistry knowledge. Use when working with organic reactions, mechanisms, functional groups, stereochemistry, synthesis planning, spectroscopy, or named reactions. Also use when the user mentions 'organic reaction', 'mechanism', 'functional group', 'stereochemistry', 'synthesis', 'NMR', 'IR spectroscopy', 'SN1', 'SN2', 'elimination', 'addition', 'aromatic', 'carbonyl', or 'named reaction'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce a release test-impact analysis for a Tamanu version upgrade: compare two Tamanu releases and classify every functional area as Full Test, Smoke Test, or Skip, each with a short reason and the Linear card or PR reference. Use when the user wants a test plan, QA scope, regression scope, or "what to test" for a Tamanu release or upgrade, wants to compare or diff two Tamanu versions (e.g. v2.57 to v2.59), or asks which areas changed between two releases. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.Y branches vs vX.Y.Z tags) and maps changed files and PRs to Tamanu functional sections (Patient Management, Encounters/Charting, Surveys & Programs, Medications, Labs, Imaging, Appointments, Vaccinations, Sync, Settings, Reports, Admin/Permissions, Mobile, etc.). Optionally maps against a regression-testing spreadsheet's sections when one is provided.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns a business need and its constraints into a DRAFT RFP requirements pack: traced functional and non-functional requirements with priorities, mandatory gates, evaluation criteria with weights left to the business owner, and fact-seeking supplier questions. Solution-neutral; never names a supplier or product. Use when the user asks to "write the RFP requirements", "turn this business case into tender requirements", "draft the supplier questionnaire", "structure our RFQ from this brief" or "set up evaluation criteria before we go to market". Do not use for responses already received, use rfp-comparison-pack to compare them or supplier-evaluation-matrix to score them instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/metagenomics/functional. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement functional Clawix UI wiring while respecting visual mutation boundaries, pattern contracts, protected surfaces, and debt baselines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive Domain-Driven Design modeling sessions based on DDD Distilled (Vaughn Vernon) and Domain Modeling Made Functional (Scott Wlaschin). Guides users through strategic and tactical design via 13 phases: discover, storming, contexts, mapping, aggregates, events, validate, glossary, workflows, types, simulate, publish, sync. Phase 13 (sync) reconciles divergences found by --analyze between the domain model and the implementation — judging whether the model or the code is authoritative, then planning and implementing the fix and re-aligning the model. Phases 9-11 take the conceptual model from phases 1-8 and produce workflow pipeline designs, compilable type definitions (TypeScript, Kotlin, Scala, Rust, C#, F#), workflow verification via type-level tests, and automatic UI field enumeration from the domain model. Phase 12 (publish) renders all docs/domain artifacts into one self-contained, cross-linked HTML site (separate files joined by a shared nav). Each phase is an interactive dialogue where AI acts as facilitator and domain expert challenger. Use when: "DDD", "ドメイン設計", "ドメインモデリング", "Event Storming", "Bounded Context", "集約設計", "ユビキタス言語", "コンテキストマップ", "ワークフロー設計", "パイプライン設計", "ステップ分割", "中間型", "型駆動フロー", "型駆動設計", "Domain Modeling Made Functional", "Railway Oriented Programming", "入力画面項目", "フォーム項目洗い出し", "UI 項目抽出", "HTMLにまとめる", "ドキュメントサイト化", "成果物を1つのHTMLに", "publish", "モデルと実装の差異", "差異解消", "実装との乖離", "モデルとコードを一致", "差異の実装計画", "sync", "複数フェーズを逐次実行", "フェーズをまとめて実行", "/ddd run", "サブコマンド一覧", "/ddd list", "/ddd", "ドメイン分析したい", "モデリングしたい", or any domain design / type modeling activity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Functional error handling in Dart using the fpdart package with Either, Option, TaskEither, and Do notation. Use when replacing try-catch with type-safe error handling or composing async operations functionally.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.