'recommend rule' 검색 결과

Review prose in Quarto manuscript files for clutter, weak verbs, inconsistent voice, and unclear explanations using William Zinsser’s writing principles. Receive a separate Markdown report with section-based recommendations and reasons, while the source file remains unchanged.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Finding wordy expressions in an academic manuscript
• Reviewing only the introduction
• Checking section openings and conclusions

Use when the user asks to "personalize the email", "add merge tags / dynamic content", "set up conditional blocks per segment", or "make first-name and product-recommendation fields fall back safely"; produces a merge-tag map with per-tag fallbacks, conditional-block rules with per-segment variations, a fallback-safety audit, and a PII guard on what may render, informing the SEND E (Engagement/personalization) dimension. Not for building the segments — use list-segment-builder; not for writing the base copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring EQS or running vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件个性化/合并标签/条件内容块/兜底默认值

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AWS security service suitability, coverage and cost recommendations: WAF/origin overlap, AWS Network Firewall inspection coverage and policy review, VPC endpoint, Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN segmentation and DNS Firewall security-control suitability, certificate renewal ownership and monitoring, incident response triage ownership, centralized security log store (CloudWatch or Security Lake). Also factual configuration, findings, data sources and severity scoring for GuardDuty, Inspector, Security Hub V2/OCSF (Exposure, connectors, automation), Security Hub CSPM/ASFF (standards, controls), Macie, Detective, Security Lake, AWS Security Incident Response membership and case coverage, and Organizations security policies. Applies to advisory security-service choices even when one service is named. Implementation, rule or code authoring, deployment, scans and troubleshooting outside these factual procedures belong to specialist skills. Supports local AWS CLI and AWS MCP.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze weekly marketing campaign performance data across channels. Use when analyzing multi-channel digital marketing data to calculate funnel metrics (CTR, CVR) and compare to benchmarks, compute cost and revenue efficiency metrics (ROAS, CPA, Net Profit), or get budget reallocation recommendations based on performance rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze weekly marketing campaign performance data across channels. Use when analyzing multi-channel digital marketing data to calculate funnel metrics (CTR, CVR) and compare to benchmarks, compute cost and revenue efficiency metrics (ROAS, CPA, Net Profit), or get budget reallocation recommendations based on performance rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Save the current business state to disk so future Claude Code sessions can pick up where you left off. Captures confirmed conclusions, ruled-out directions, open hypotheses, and the next recommended skill. Use when the user has just reached a conclusion in /money-discover, /money-strategy, /money-diagnose, or any pipeline phase, and wants to lock the state in. Also triggered by: 'save this', 'checkpoint', 'remember this', 'lock it in', '保存', '存档', '记下来', '这个结论留着'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Inspects and configures the web application firewall (WAF) in front of a Power Pages production site. Lists the current state, recommends enabling protection when it is off, and walks the user through adding, updating, or removing custom rules — IP blocks, country blocks, path blocks, and rate limits. Use when the user wants to turn on WAF, block traffic by IP or country, rate-limit login or signup pages, protect pages from brute-force attempts, restrict access to specific paths, review the current firewall configuration, or asks "is my site protected against bots / common web attacks?" — even if they say "add rate limit" or "protect login page" without mentioning "firewall" or "WAF".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS — issue-spotting, rule application, case/statute analysis, memos, and multi-step agentic research. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (Vals AI LegalBench across 124 models; Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark for agentic work). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model for legal research / case analysis / a memo", "best AI for legal reasoning", "route this research task", or is starting legal analysis without a fixed model.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit token consumption across agents, skills, MCP servers, and rules. Identifies bloat, redundant components, and produces prioritized token-savings recommendations. Use when the context window is filling up too fast or before adding new components.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose a product's growth model, stage, and current constraint, then route the request to the narrowest Gingiris specialist and execute it when installed. Use for broad or uncertain growth questions involving go-to-market, Product Hunt, GitHub stars, open-source marketing, B2B SaaS, PLG, ASO, SEO/GEO, AI citations, KOL outreach, UGC, international expansion, user interviews, competitor research, or community programs. Trigger when users ask “how do I grow or launch this,” “which growth skill should I use,” 怎么增长、怎么发布、出海、冷启动、增长策略、不知道用哪个 skill、開発者マーケティング, or 성장 전략. Includes B2B pipeline and B2C activation-retention model selection, specialist handoff rules, relevant gingiris.tools recommendations, and advisory-services guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Retirement projection with Monte Carlo simulation logic. Calculates required nest egg via 4% rule and 25x expenses, projected vs needed gap, contribution recommendations, asset allocation by age, Social Security claim optimization, healthcare cost projections, and withdrawal sequence planning. Use when the user says "/finance retirement", "am I on track for retirement", "how much do I need to retire", "Social Security timing", or any retirement question.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

REQUIRED before copying any third-party SKILL.md, MCP manifest, Cursor rule, or agent config into this machine or forwarding one to a user. Installing a skill grants Read/Bash/network under your identity — this is `curl | sh` in a different costume. Do not install, load, recommend, or forward any third-party agent asset until this skill has vetted it. Bypassing this turns the agent into a delivery vector.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Displays the full skills catalog with descriptions, autonomous build chains, recommended pipelines, and parallelization rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits Claude Code context window consumption across agents, skills, MCP servers, and rules. Identifies bloat, redundant components, and produces prioritized token-savings recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit websites for SEO, performance, security, technical, content, and 15 other issue cateories with 230+ rules using the squirrelscan CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores, broken links, meta tag analysis, and actionable recommendations. Use to discover and asses website o...

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "personalize the email", "add merge tags / dynamic content", "set up conditional blocks per segment", or "make first-name and product-recommendation fields fall back safely"; produces a merge-tag map with per-tag fallbacks, conditional-block rules with per-segment variations, a fallback-safety audit, and a PII guard on what may render, informing the SEND E (Engagement/personalization) dimension. Not for building the segments — use list-segment-builder; not for writing the base copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring EQS or running vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件个性化/合并标签/条件内容块/兜底默认值

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit websites for SEO, performance, security, technical, content, and 15 other issue cateories with 230+ rules using the squirrelscan CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores, broken links, meta tag analysis, and actionable recommendations. Use to discover and asses website or webapp issues and health.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Work out the order and the loose ends before turning down an offer or withdrawing from a selection process: whether the offer being kept is actually settled in writing, whether each decline is mid-selection, post-offer, or after acceptance, who besides the employer has to be told when the application came through an agent, a school recommendation, or a referral, which reply deadlines have passed, and what documents, expenses, or borrowed items are still outstanding. Use when a user holds more than one offer and needs to decline the rest, wants to withdraw from a process they are no longer pursuing, or has been asked to turn down other employers as a condition; do not use to decide whether to decline, to rule on what declining after acceptance means legally, or to send any message.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.