'socratic' 검색 결과

Audit the reasoning of a document or argument (memo, proposal, investment analysis, board paper, article, the user's own draft): claims, evidence, unstated assumptions, logical gaps, fallacies, and what would falsify it, each anchored to quoted text. Use whenever the user wants reasoning examined, in any language ("audit this argument", "is this analysis sound", "poke holes in this proposal", "review the logic of my draft"; Vietnamese "phản biện giúp tôi", "soi lập luận này", "tài liệu này có lỗ hổng gì", "góp ý bản nháp của tôi"), even when they never say "critical thinking". Also use when the user drops a document and asks whether to trust or act on it, or asks to see their reasoning profile. Not for company-level strategic bets (strategy-board) or learning a topic through dialogue (socratic-questor).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive prompt engineering coach that elevates vague prompts through Socratic dialogue, multiple transformation styles, and guided learning. Use when improving prompts, learning agentic engineering, or wanting coached guidance rather than automated transformation. NEVER auto-executes - always displays and asks first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive workshop skill for developing messaging and positioning. Walks through a structured Socratic Q&A with the team, captures answers, and builds the messaging_positioning.md doc in real time.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pin a measurable, outcome-based Definition of Done for a diamond — a behaviour-change that creates value, not a build-list. Problem-first Socratic sequence; writes definition_of_done to the diamond at birth or retrofits it when missing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Phase 1 of 5 — Socratic interview capturing WHAT and WHY; outputs a sprint-sized REQ doc for plan-architecture. Use only when the user asks to run Phase 1, plan requirements, or start the requirements interview — never trigger automatically from a feature description.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trains the HUMAN user's critical thinking through four modes: drill (argument-analysis items with a single defensible answer, judge stance), scene (Socratic exploration of synthetic scenes or user-supplied material, no verdicts on interpretations; includes a configure track — design the information request and verification plan for a decision before any analysis), expedition (guided audit of impossible-tier problems from verified packs), and detective (a runtime-generated multi-layer case worked as an escape room, guide-and-judge stance). Use when the user wants to practice critical thinking, analyze arguments, hunt assumptions, examine bias, train reasoning, or decide what information a decision needs first. Triggers: critical thinking practice, train my thinking, drill, scene, byom, configure, information plan, what would I need to know, spot manipulation tactics, scam literacy, 批判思考練習, 話術辨識, detective, 查案, 破案, 偵探.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pressure-test an assumption, decision, or inherited constraint — Socratic cross-examination that forces you to defend or abandon your position

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think out loud about a problem, decision, or approach — Socratic friction to help you find clarity, not sympathy

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in Pre-Socratics, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic schools including Stoicism, Epicureanism, and Skepticism

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Socratic questioning protocol + user communication. MANDATORY for complex requests, new features, or unclear requirements. Includes progress reporting and error handling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a vague idea into a concrete, actionable spec through a short Socratic dialogue, then hand the result off to an existing moflo surface — a /flo ticket, a spell, or memory. Use BEFORE you have a defined unit of work, when the goal is still fuzzy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Strategic planning consultant that produces decision-complete work plans through Socratic interview, codebase exploration, Metis gap analysis, and optional Momus high-accuracy review. MUST USE when the task has 5+ steps, scope is ambiguous, multiple modules are involved, or the user asks for a plan. Triggers: plan this, create a work plan, interview me, start planning, prometheustic, plan mode, help me plan this, break this down.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Meta-skill that orchestrates the discourse skill suite: routes between steel-man-argument, socratic-questioning, toulmin-argument-analysis, logical-fallacy-detector, bad-faith-rhetoric-detector, discourse-elision-analyzer, forensic-speech-structure, and productive-discourse-facilitator. Use when analyzing conversations, facilitating discourse, or operating as a dialogue copilot. Maintains mode (silent analysis, coaching overlay, active facilitator) and decides which skills to invoke based on conversation dynamics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured second-pass reasoning after a review or plan verdict: pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic lens, etc. NOT for initial review (mk:review) or new plans (mk:plan-creator).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

PM-mode brainstorm helper. Captures the requirement via Socratic dialogue before any entry phase (`/intake`, `/spec`, `/tdd`) drafts its artifact. Stage 0 skip-check, Stage 1 gap-analysis, Stage 2 probe-loop, Stage 3 confirm-and-persist. Output lives at `docs/brief/<slug>.md`. Never proposes solutions — Stage 2 dialogue discipline is structurally enforced via `discipline.mjs`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Load only when the user asks for Robin/Rodin neutral mode, Socratic intellectual sparring, steelmanning, anti-echo-chamber critique, or a deep societal/political/religious/economic discussion; not for coding, factual lookup, or ordinary advice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrate one or more thinking frameworks to work through any problem, decision, document, or idea rigorously. Diagnoses which frameworks fit — inversion, pre-mortem, assumption-mapping, socratic, adversarial-hat — then guides the user through them in the right sequence. Load when the user asks for deep thinking, says "help me think through this properly", "apply your best thinking frameworks", "I need to think carefully before deciding", or "what thinking tools should I use here". Also the entry point for any complex problem where the right framework is unclear. Covers product decisions, engineering tradeoffs, personal decisions, strategy, creative challenges — any domain.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.