'the' 검색 결과

Prepare for payroll by forecasting cash, drafting overdue invoice reminders to address shortfalls, and checking timesheets for anomalies. Produce a validated payroll worksheet or stage approved inputs in Gusto, leaving final payroll submission to the owner.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking whether cash will cover the next payroll
• Prioritizing overdue invoices to address a payroll shortfall
• Reviewing timesheet anomalies before payroll

Finds and loads relevant Google skills for choosing or setting up services, databases, storage, authentication, and other platform components. It supplies guidance for comparing Google options, understanding trade-offs, and recognizing when another choice fits better.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare platforms for running a service
• Find guidance for database or authentication setup
• Locate a skill for a named Google product or API

Run a company event — the launch party, the customer day, the team celebration — as the operation it is: the goal that shapes every choice, the budget with its forgotten lines, the vendor and venue coordination, the run-of-show with owners, and the day-of roles that keep hosts hosting. Use when asked plan the company event, organize our customer day/holiday party/launch event, what am I forgetting for this event, or be the run-of-show for Thursday. Produces the goal-shaped plan, the budget with the forgotten lines, the run-of-show, and the day-of role card.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Your business planner. Compiles everything the other founder skills wrote (the board's verdict, the competitors, the buyer panel, pricing, the offer, the CFO's numbers, marketing, brand, operations and the launch plan) into one business plan with a verdict at the top that is computed from the numbers, never written by hand: Profitable, Not yet (with the failing numbers) or Incomplete. Adds an executive summary and a one-page version for a partner, lender or investor. Use when the user says "write my business plan", "put it all together", "is it profitable", "give me the plan", or at the end of the founder pack.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create the release notes and upgrade guide for a mariadb-operator release. Given the release PR whose body lists every PR included in the release, it gathers each PR, groups the changes by relevance, and produces `docs/releases/RELEASE_<version>_HEADER.md.gotmpl` and `docs/releases/UPGRADE_<version>.md` in the format the previous releases use, then opens a PR targeting `release-<version>`. If no release PR is provided it asks for the new version and infers the changes from git history since the last tag. Use whenever the user wants release notes, an upgrade/update guide, or docs for a new mariadb-operator version — "create the release notes for 26.10.0", "write the upgrade guide", "document this release", "prepare the release PR docs" — even if they don't mention a release PR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a one-line description of a repetitive task into a reusable, self-guarding slash command. loop-forge diagnoses the task into one of 5 loop shapes (Batch / Pipeline / Refine / Watch / Explore), interviews for the blanks, and auto-injects two safety devices the user didn't know they needed — an independent verifier (maker ≠ checker) and a hardstop (a budget/count/cooldown ceiling) — then previews the result and stamps it as a `/command` they can run forever. Use when the user says "/loop", "/loop-forge", "/make-it-loop", "automate this", "make this repeatable", "turn this into a command", "do this for all 100 items", "do X every time Y happens", "generate several and pick the best", or otherwise wants to capture a recurring task as a reusable slash command instead of re-typing the prompt by hand. Works in any language: it interviews the user and writes the stamped command in the user's own language. Non-goal — it does not schedule unattended runs (launchd/cron) or publish externally on its own; it stamps the reusable command and stops there.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drive your own Claude Code session from Basecamp. Starts the local connector (basecamp connect), which listens to the account's event feed as a Basecamp agent and prints one line per trusted request: a mention, an assignment, a ping from its operator, a comment on a thread the agent follows, a boost on something it wrote. The connector boosts each one that asks for something the moment it arrives; this session puts that boost in its own words, picks the repo for the project, and hands the request to a background subagent that reads the context, does the work with your settings and tools, and replies as the agent. The session stays free to take the next request, and you can keep using it. Also connects an agent to this computer and manages its setup: the agent's credential (basecamp auth agent connect), who may give it work, and which projects it serves (basecamp connect setup), plus status and doctor. Use when asked to connect an agent, drive agents from Basecamp, watch Basecamp for an agent's mentions, start or stop the connector, or change who can give the agent work or which projects it serves.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, creative concept diversity for Meta Advantage+ (why six variants of one ad are not a diverse library, and what to brief instead), creator-made ad creative on a spend-share deal, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions — starting with whether the form fill or booked meeting fires on a confirmed success at all (inline AJAX forms, iframe embeds, Calendly event_scheduled vs a picked slot), proved by a test conversion that arrives. Also triggers on: conversions stopped, zero conversions, spend but no conversions, too many conversions, double counting, conversion tracking not working. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, u

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepares a DRAFT data incident impact brief from the incident notes and data inventory the user provides: the timeline as stated, systems involved matched to the inventory, data categories held and evidenced as involved, people and record counts potentially affected with the source and method behind every figure, third parties, notification questions for legal and the data protection officer, and every UNKNOWN with the evidence that would settle it. No legal determination: it never states whether the incident is a reportable breach, whether notice is due, to whom or by when. Use when the user asks to "prepare the impact brief for this incident", "what data was involved", "how many people are affected", "map the incident to our data inventory" or "pull together what legal needs on the incident". Do not use for the blameless postmortem or root-cause timeline, use incident-postmortem-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns a schedule extract (milestone list or planning tool export) and the period's status notes into a DRAFT plain-language slip explanation: which milestones and activities slipped and by how many working days, arithmetic shown, why per the notes as verbatim fragments with source and date, what each slip pushes next per the extract, and the decision each slip needs framed as a question with the options the notes propose and the owner the governance documents name, every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "explain the schedule slip", "what slipped this month and why", "write the schedule commentary for the steering pack", "put the delay in plain language for the sponsor" or "what decisions do these slips need". Do not use for the weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead; for cost variances, use budget-variance-explainer; for one sprint's carry-over, use sprint-review-summary. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds DRAFT user personas from the research notes, interview summaries, survey free text and support themes the user provides: for each persona the goals, pains, jobs to be done, context of use, quotes exactly as supplied with their participant codes, and the evidence count behind every attribute, with names, demographics and any detail no participant stated left UNKNOWN rather than invented. Use when the user asks to "build personas from these interviews", "who are our users based on this research", "draft user personas", "turn these research notes into personas" or "update our personas with the new interviews". Do not use for theming a batch of customer feedback into counts, use customer-feedback-theme-synthesis instead; for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis; for the requirements those personas imply, use product-requirements-draft. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Search the documents uploaded for the CURRENT task/row (e.g. an Agentic Table row's attached files) via the `unique-cli uploaded-search "<query>"` command, with the same per-turn citation tracking as `unique-cli search` so cited facts render as `<sup>N</sup>` footnotes and clickable reference chips on the Unique platform. ALWAYS use this skill when the user refers to documents they uploaded/attached to this task, or when you need facts from the task's own attached files. These uploaded files are scoped to the chat, NOT to a knowledge-base folder, so they will NEVER appear in `unique-cli search` results no matter the folder or metadata filters. Use `unique-cli search` for the knowledge base and this command for the task's uploaded documents; the two are complementary and citation numbering is shared across them within a turn.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare a request to change the terms of a Japanese job offer before accepting it, sorting what the user wants changed (pay components, start date, work style, location, title, probation) by priority, tying each ask to a basis the user can show (the written offer, the job posting, what was said in interviews, their own records), working the timing back from the acceptance deadline, and drafting the message to the employer or recruiting agent. Use when a user has an offer and wants to ask for higher pay, a later start date, more remote days, or other changed terms, or wants to know how to raise it without losing the offer; do not use to predict whether the request will succeed, to set a target figure from market rates, to fabricate a competing offer, to decide whether to accept, or to send anything to the employer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

기록된 AI 사용 비용과 예산 정보를 Prometheus 지표나 JSON으로 내보내 외부 대시보드 시각화와 Webhook 보고에 활용합니다.

• Grafana와 Prometheus 비용 지표를 갱신합니다
• Webhook으로 비용을 한 번 보고합니다
• 예산 사용률을 모니터링합니다

Guide browser work inside the Claude desktop app, including reading page text, opening tabs, and handling existing sign-ins. Covers site approvals, browser visibility, and connection problems when a cloud session uses the desktop browser.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Read web page text in the Claude desktop app
• Open a page in an additional browser tab
• Guide a user through sign-in or verification

Helps Claude work in desktop apps by viewing screenshots, clicking, typing, and scrolling. It covers access approval, choosing appropriate tools, and handling app restrictions for tasks in Notes, Finder, settings, and other native apps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Organizing notes in Notes
• Working with files in Finder
• Checking settings shown on screen

Create and revise shared documents in Claude Docs, where people and Claude can edit together. The skill guides document creation, targeted changes, and comment replies through the connector, with updates appearing live to readers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Create a shared planning document
• Revise specific sections of a document
• Read and reply to document comments

Prepare a local browser app or standalone browser file for handoff. Verify its start behavior where supported, then provide exact commands and a reachable URL, or the artifact path, with an honest account of what was checked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Hand off a local browser app with verified start instructions
• Deliver a single-file app with a basic startup check
• Share a playable browser game with clear access instructions

Explore a marketing decision through simulated advisors using well-known marketers' published frameworks. Compare their recommendations, uncover disagreements and trade-offs, and receive a synthesis with concrete next steps suited to the business and its constraints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare perspectives on a positioning strategy
• Review an advertising concept through several frameworks
• Debate a pricing change or launch plan