151건 · 관련도순
Review offer letters against the candidate’s work location, including non-compete clauses and overtime eligibility. Research current local rules, cite sources, and organize changes or questions that need legal review before the offer is sent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare generated or hand-drawn artwork for a game's required file layout, dimensions, colors, and transparency. Create sprite sheets, assemble animation frames, and render 3D models into consistent views for use as game images.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit TLS/SSL, the technology that encrypts network connections, across servers and mobile apps. The skill covers outdated protocols, weak encryption, certificate validation failures, known vulnerabilities, and replay risks, helping organize evidence and prioritize fixes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds frosted-glass interface components using translucent backgrounds, background blur, subtle borders, and soft shadows. Provides shared CSS settings and examples for consistent cards, navigation bars, modals, and buttons, with guidance on readability and browser support.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Support authorized external security reconnaissance, the discovery of exposed systems and information. The skill provides search queries, probe references, secret detection patterns, and scoring guidance to help identify assets and organize findings with evidence and confidence levels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Investigate cloud configuration weaknesses across AWS, GCP, and Azure, including public storage, exposed services, and leaked credentials. Find candidates in public information and JavaScript, then verify data access and permissions to establish practical impact.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research competitors’ live Meta and Google ads to identify opening hooks, offers, calls to action, and landing pages. Receive a sourced creative brief and up to three test ideas adapted to your product.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Picks random winners from lists, spreadsheets, or Google Sheets for giveaways, raffles, and contests. Ensures fair, unbiased selection with transparency.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Query, search, and download data from the openFDA API for drugs, devices, foods, tobacco, cosmetics, animal and veterinary products, substances, and transparency data. Use for FDA adverse events, recalls, labeling, approvals, shortages, 510(k) clearances, NDC lookups, and any FDA safety or regulatory data query across all 28 API endpoints.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turns one-shot external recon into a continuous monitoring program. Covers the scheduled re-scan-and-diff loop (baseline snapshot -> interval sleep -> re-scan -> asset/finding delta -> threshold-gated webhook alert), the scan-to-scan diff engine (new/removed/changed assets by a tracked-attribute table, new/resolved findings by a stable cross-scan fingerprint), adversary CTI / chatter monitoring across six public feeds (ransomwatch, ransomware.live, HackerNews Algolia search, Reddit security-subreddit RSS, GitHub Gist code-search, public Telegram channel scraping) with a source-kind-aware severity engine (leak-site/forum/telegram/paste tiers, CRITICAL through INFO), literal/glob/regex watchlist pattern matching, full-corpus capture with retroactive rescan on new watchlist entries, infrastructure-tracking-over-time discipline (certificate-transparency, passive-DNS, port/service, and typosquat re-enumeration cadence, and what a genuine 'perimeter drift' event looks like in the diff output), a five-state finding-lifecycle state machine (open/triaged/risk_accepted/resolved/false_positive) with per-severity SLA and fingerprint-based cross-scan dedup and auto-resolve/reopen rules, the alert-fatigue trap where a lifecycle-unaware rule re-fires on an already-accepted finding, a durable retry/backoff alert-outbox pattern ('queued is not delivered'), and copy-paste bash-cron plus PowerShell-Scheduled-Task recipes for a re-scan+diff loop with the Slack-compatible webhook payload shape. Passive OSINT and analysis only -- no new active-intrusion technique. Use when setting up ongoing monitoring for a retainer or MSSP engagement, tuning alert thresholds to avoid fatigue, triaging a finding's lifecycle status, investigating adversary chatter about a brand, building a 'what changed on the perimeter since last week' report, or deciding whether a persisting finding should re-alert.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to set up, debug, or interpret app install attribution — including SKAdNetwork (SKAN), Apple's AdAttributionKit, Google Play Install Referrer, MMPs (AppsFlyer, Adjust, Singular, Branch, Kochava), deep links, deferred deep links, conversion values, postback windows, or privacy thresholds. Use when the user mentions "SKAdNetwork", "SKAN", "SKAN 4", "AdAttributionKit", "AAK", "MMP", "AppsFlyer", "Adjust", "Singular", "Branch", "attribution", "conversion value", "postback", "Install Referrer", "deferred deep link", "iOS 14.5", "ATT", "App Tracking Transparency", "IDFA", or "I can't measure my ad campaigns". For paid campaign strategy, see ua-campaign and apple-search-ads. For analytics events, see app-analytics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when determining author order on research manuscripts, assigning CRediT contributor roles for transparency, documenting individual contributions to collaborative projects, or resolving authorship disputes in multi-institutional research. Generates fair and transparent auth...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Picks random winners from lists, spreadsheets, or Google Sheets for giveaways, raffles, and contests. Ensures fair, unbiased selection with transparency.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decide when and how your product and communications must (or should) label AI-generated content, and write the disclosure policy — surface-by-surface rules, exact label wording, and the review trigger for regulations like the EU AI Act's transparency obligations. Use when asked 'do we have to label AI content', 'write our AI disclosure policy', 'are we covered for the AI Act', or when marketing/support/product start shipping AI-generated output. Produces a disclosure policy with a per-surface matrix and ready-to-use label copy. Not legal advice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Help users design and maintain a high-performing culture by balancing radical transparency, psychological safety, and a relentless focus on customer delight.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when planning or reporting the analysis for an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — multilevel/HLM and growth models, IRT/measurement, quasi-experimental estimation, or qualitative coding and thematic analysis. Analysis must meet the AERA reporting standards (warrant + transparency). Strengthens analysis reporting; it does not run models for you.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting the Journal of Cleaner Production or deciding whether a cleaner-production/sustainability manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the cleaner-production contribution and methodological-transparency bar, LCA/system-boundary expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pre-flight policy check for Meta ads. Takes ad copy plus advertiser context, resolves and fetches the relevant Meta transparency-center policy pages at runtime, and returns a Pass / Fix Required / Block verdict with cited findings and rewrites.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a single image of a character, creature, prop, vehicle, or building must be seen from new camera angles through the Scenario MCP server: turnarounds, a 360 orbit, views from behind, above, below, or straight down, consistent multi-angle renders on the same grounded background or on transparency, or novel views that go through a 3D intermediary instead of guessing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
How humans and AI compose in content workflows. Where AI legitimately participates, where humans must own, hybrid workflow patterns, voice ownership preservation, the AI slop problem, disclosure and transparency, team calibration, and the ethics of intellectually honest AI-assisted content production. Triggers on AI content workflow, AI-assisted writing, hybrid content production, AI in editorial, AI slop, AI disclosure, AI usage policy, AI content ethics, voice preservation with AI, team AI calibration. Also triggers when content feels generic despite quality tools, when team AI usage has drifted into inconsistency, or when a regulated or trust-sensitive context requires explicit AI policy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI lifecycle management, AI incident management, AI transparency, AI bias, AI certification readiness, or any topic related to implementing or auditing an AI Management System. Also trigger for questions like "how do I become ISO 42001 certified?", "what controls does ISO 42001 require?", "how do I assess AI risk under 42001?", "what is an AIMS?", or any request involving organisational governance of AI systems, responsible AI frameworks, or AI regulatory compliance aligned to an ISO standard.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus, Reg. (EU) 2026/1744, in force July 27, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of August 2026. GPAI enforcement powers active since August 2, 2026.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.