'tsp' 검색 결과

Analyze git history to map contributors to security-sensitive files, identify reliance on too few people, and find stale areas. Export CSV and JSON results for ownership reviews, graph exploration, and comparison with CODEOWNERS.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find stale security-sensitive code with few maintainers
• Check reliance on individual authentication or cryptography maintainers
• Compare CODEOWNERS with actual contribution history

Review the current codebase for ignored errors, embedded credentials, unused exports, and obvious type-safety gaps. Receive a report ordered by severity, with file and line references, while all source files remain unchanged.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Run a quick code quality review
• Check for embedded keys or passwords
• Find missing error handling and unsafe type usage

Turn trending topics into illustrated posts for 微信公众号, 小红书, and 哔哩哔哩. The skill scores topic ideas, adapts writing to each platform, prepares HTML layouts, and supports previewing content before sending it through publishing scripts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Select promising topics from keyword-based suggestions
• Prepare illustrated articles for 微信公众号
• Adapt a topic for multiple publishing platforms

Build a graph of functions and calls across multiple programming languages to investigate entry points, paths to sensitive operations, and potential impact. Use the results to prioritize security reviews and connect external findings with source code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Tracing call paths from entry points to sensitive functions
• Prioritizing code for a security audit
• Connecting calls across language and RPC boundaries

Create Mermaid diagrams from code relationships parsed by Trailmark. Visualize function calls, class inheritance, module dependencies, class members, complexity hotspots, and paths from inputs to sensitive functions, with adjustable focus, depth, and layout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Mapping function calls around a selected function
• Visualizing class inheritance and members
• Drawing module dependency maps

Review Windows privilege escalation paths from a standard user session to Administrator or SYSTEM. Examine service permissions, token privileges, library loading, scheduled tasks, and stored credentials, with detection indicators for defensive validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigating privilege escalation in authorized Windows assessments
• Reviewing service and scheduled task permissions
• Checking detection coverage with attack and defense teams

Expose useful iOS app actions and content through Shortcuts, Siri, Spotlight, widgets, and controls. Guides action selection, system-facing data types, implementation, and checks that actions complete correctly or open the intended app workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Expose app actions through Siri and Shortcuts
• Open a specific app workflow from a system entry point
• Share action parameters with widgets and controls

Analyze git history to map contributors to security-sensitive files and identify ownership gaps. Estimate bus factor, a measure of dependence on few people, group files that change together, and export CSV or JSON for further analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Finding sensitive code with stale, concentrated ownership
• Checking reliance on one person for authentication code
• Comparing CODEOWNERS with contribution history

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc + binscatter. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step Stata pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (use/import, destring, misstable, duplicates, merge assert), (2) variable construction (gen/egen/winsor2/xtile/xtset with L./F./D.), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (tabstat/balancetable/asdoc), (4) classical diagnostic tests (sktest/swilk/hettest/imtest/xtserial/xttest3/vif/dfuller/kpss/hausman/estat overid), (5) baseline modeling (reg/xtreg/reghdfe/ivreg2/ivregress/csdid/did_imputation/eventstudyinteract/sdid/rdrobust/synth/psmatch2/teffects/heckman/qreg/ppmlhdfe), (6) robustness battery (bacondecomp/honestdid/rwolf/ritest/wildbootstrap/oster), (7) further analysis (subgroup/triple-diff/interactions/medsem/marginsplot/binscatter by group), (8) publication-ready tables & figures (esttab/outreg2/estout/coefplot/marginsplot/rdplot/twoway combined). **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `teffects ipw` / `teffects ipwra` / `teffects aipw` / `eltmle`, Mendelian randomization via `mrrobust` (IVW / Egger / weighted median) and `mregger` / `mrpresso`, KM / Cox / AFT / RMST survival via `sts` / `stcox` / `streg` / `strmst2`, E-value sensitivity via `evalue` (Linden-Mathur), principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `ddml` / `pdslasso`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `crforest` and `ddml interactive`, causal forest via `crforest` / `cforest`, BART/BCF via `bart` / `bartCause`-style externals, CATE distribution + policy tree via `crforest`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal externals, fairness audit, DAG learning via `pcalg` / external Python callouts). Use when the user asks for a complete Stata empirical analysis, wants a reproducible .do-file pipeline, needs a Stata counterpart to the Python StatsPAI / Full-empirical-analysis-skill, or names a specific Stata step in isolation ("run reghdfe with two-way clustering", "csdid event study", "winsor2 at 1%", "esttab to LaTeX", "coefplot with CI", "ivreg2 weak-IV test", "synth_runner placebos", "teffects psmatch balance check"). Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation Stata", "teffects ipw aipw", "eltmle", "mrrobust", "mregger weighted median", "stcox AFT survival", "strmst2", "evalue Stata", "STROBE Stata", "公共健康 Stata", "流行病学 Stata". Mode B triggers on "ddml Stata", "pdslasso", "crforest causal forest Stata", "policy tree Stata", "因果机器学习 Stata".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step pipeline an applied economist or quantitative social scientist runs on every paper — (1) data cleaning, (2) variable construction & transformation, (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1, (4) statistical diagnostic tests, (5) baseline empirical modeling, (6) robustness battery, (7) further analysis (mechanism, heterogeneity, mediation, moderation), (8) publication-ready tables & figures. **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation via `zepid` / hand-rolled `pandas`, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `zepid` / `econml` / `lifelines`, Mendelian randomization via `pymr` / `mrtool` (or `rpy2` → `MendelianRandomization`/`TwoSampleMR`), KM / AFT / Cox survival via `lifelines`, E-value sensitivity, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `econml.dml` / `doubleml`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `econml.metalearners` / `causalml`, causal forest via `econml.grf` / `causalml`, Dragonnet / TARNet / CEVAE neural causal via `causalml`, BCF via `pymc-bart` / `bcf-py`, matrix completion, CATE distribution + policy tree via `econml.policy` / `policytree-py`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `mapie`, fairness audit via `fairlearn`, DAG learning via `causal-learn` / `cdt` / LLM-assisted). Prescribes which library to reach for at each step, shows the canonical code, and links to deeper `references/` files for variant-specific patterns. Use when the user asks for a **complete empirical analysis** in Python, wants to replicate an applied-economics paper from scratch, needs a reproducible workflow that is NOT opinionated on any single vertical package (contrast with StatsPAI), wants explicit control over every estimator and diagnostic, or asks "how do I write a full empirical pipeline in Python?". Also triggers when the user names a specific classical step in isolation — "winsorize at 1/99%", "run Breusch-Pagan", "build a Table 1 balance table", "do a placebo test", "event study plot", "mediation analysis" — and wants it wired into the broader pipeline. Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation", "IPTW", "TMLE", "Mendelian randomization", "STROBE", "公共健康", "流行病学". Mode B triggers on "DML", "double machine learning", "causal forest", "meta-learner", "Dragonnet", "BCF", "policy tree", "conformal causal", "fairness audit", "因果机器学习".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest + clubSandwich + AER + ivreg + did + bacondecomp + HonestDiD + eventstudyr + rdrobust + rddensity + Synth + gsynth + synthdid + MatchIt + WeightIt + cobalt + ebal + grf + DoubleML + mediation + marginaleffects + modelsummary + kableExtra + gt + ggplot2 + ggpubr + cowplot + binsreg. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step R pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (read_dta/read_csv, naniar, janitor, validate-merges), (2) variable construction (mutate/across/winsorize/group_by + lag/lead with dplyr), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (gtsummary, modelsummary::datasummary, tableone), (4) classical diagnostic tests (shapiro/jarque.bera.test/bptest/dwtest/bgtest/vif/adf.test/kpss.test/Hausman), (5) baseline modeling (fixest::feols, ivreg, did::att_gt, eventstudyr, sun_ab, did_imputation, synthdid, rdrobust, MatchIt, WeightIt, grf::causal_forest, DoubleML, mediation), (6) robustness battery (modelsummary stack, clubSandwich CRSE, fwildclusterboot, ri2, robomit Oster, bacondecomp, HonestDiD), (7) further analysis (interactions + marginaleffects, mediation::mediate, gsem via lavaan, dose-response splines, grf CATE), (8) publication-ready tables & figures (modelsummary, kableExtra, gt, stargazer, texreg, flextable to LaTeX/Word/HTML; ggplot2 + ggpubr + cowplot + binsreg + iplot for figures). **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `WeightIt` / `gfoRmula` / `tmle` / `ltmle`, Mendelian randomization via `MendelianRandomization` / `TwoSampleMR` / `MRPRESSO`, KM / Cox / AFT / RMST survival via `survival` / `survminer` / `flexsurv`, E-value sensitivity via `EValue`, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `DoubleML`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `causalweight` / `grf`, causal forest via `grf::causal_forest`, BART/BCF via `bartCause` / `bcf`, matrix completion via `MCPanel`, CATE distribution + policy tree via `policytree`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `conformalInference` / `cfcausal`, fairness audit via `fairmodels`, DAG learning via `pcalg` / `bnlearn` / LLM-assisted). Use when the user asks for a complete R empirical analysis, wants a tidyverse-style reproducible R script / Quarto workflow, prefers fixest over reghdfe, needs the R counterpart to StatsPAI / 00.1 / 00.2, or names a specific R step in isolation ("feols with cluster", "MatchIt nearest neighbor", "bacondecomp in R", "gtsummary table 1", "modelsummary to Word"). Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation R", "tmle ltmle", "MendelianRandomization", "TwoSampleMR", "MRPRESSO", "survival cox AFT", "STROBE R", "EValue R", "公共健康 R", "流行病学 R". Mode B triggers on "DoubleML R", "grf causal forest", "policytree", "bartCause bcf", "conformal causal R", "fairmodels", "pcalg NOTEARS", "因果机器学习 R".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when building, deploying, evaluating, debugging, or measuring latency for the DeepStream SOP Inference Microservice — a GPU-accelerated FastAPI service that detects whether operators perform assembly-line steps in order via event boundary detection (GEBD) plus VLM classification. Trigger even if the user does not name it: verify operator step sequence, detect missing or out-of-order SOP steps, score factory/work-cell video for procedure compliance, run VLM-based SOP checking on industrial cameras, or call /v1/chat/completions with a file, RTSP, or Basler camera. Also trigger for its internals: SOPVideoProcessor, DeepStream GEBD model (e.g. DDM) via Triton CAPI, nvds_custom_postprocess, Cosmos Reason 1/2 vLLM, SSE streaming, Kafka NvProto/JSON output, Basler/Pylon camera + emulation, Docker compose, chunk-level latency. Do NOT trigger for generic DeepStream pipelines, object detection/tracking, NIM imports, or video summarization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run RFDiffusion protein backbone design via NVIDIA NIM. Use for de novo protein backbones, motif scaffolding, binder design, hotspot residues, contigs syntax, diffusion steps, hosted NVIDIA API calls, local Docker deployment, and PDB backbone outputs for ProteinMPNN sequence design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[omh] Software slowness, memory leaks, or cost spikes: find where a system is actually slow, leaking, or expensive across runtime, memory, token cost, storage, rendering, inference, CI, and query domains, then fix one measured hot path at a time behind a regression budget. Use when the user says: ultraperf, ulw-perf, performance audit, performance bottleneck, find the bottleneck, profile the hot path, memory leak investigation, token cost hotspot.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build Azure AI Foundry agents using the Microsoft Agent Framework Python SDK (agent-framework-azure-ai). Use when creating persistent agents with AzureAIAgentsProvider, using hosted tools (code interpreter, file search, web search), integrating MCP servers, managing conversation threads, or implementing streaming responses. Covers function tools, structured outputs, and multi-tool agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-camera RTSP to WebRTC streaming via go2rtc

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Eufy camera integration — local RTSP streaming and event clips

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TP-Link Tapo camera integration — RTSP streaming and ONVIF

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reolink camera integration — RTSP and HTTP API

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide for ingesting the latest OpenAI TypeSpec specification into the openai-dotnet SDK. Use this when asked to update or ingest OpenAI API specs, copy base TypeSpec files from upstream, fix client TSP compile errors, or run code generation for new API areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Resolve conflicts and merges when several branches are open against one repo at the same time — the hotspot files every change must touch (registry manifests, a single version field, shared tool config, one aggregated test module, tracked build output), union-vs-recompute-vs-rebuild as three different correct resolutions, generated artifacts that must never be merged, non-deterministic serialization that makes every branch conflict, renumbered identifiers that git cannot show you, and why a clean auto-merge is not a passing test. Use when rebasing or merging a long-lived branch, resolving conflict markers, reviewing a merge commit, deciding what a repo should commit vs generate, or setting up a repo that will take parallel contributions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Subtour-elimination methods for TSP, VRP, pickup/dropoff routing, and routing MIPs with binary arc variables. Use when route-continuity constraints may permit disconnected cycles and the model needs MTZ constraints, flow-based connectivity constraints, DFJ subset cuts, or lazy/iterative subtour cuts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Erstellt aus Geschäftsmodell, Altbedingungen, Preislisten und Beschwerden vollständige passende AGB samt Einführungstexten. Steuert zehn Fachskills gezielt, fragt entscheidende Lücken nach und prüft aktuelle Normen und Rechtsprechung.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.