'verification' 검색 결과

Extract decisions, lessons, recurring patterns, and unexpected findings from the artifacts of a completed development phase. It organizes these learnings into a LEARNINGS.md file using planning, summary, verification, acceptance testing, and state documents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing decisions made during a completed phase
• Gathering lessons from planning and verification artifacts
• Recording discovered patterns and unexpected findings

Turn a development phase into an actionable PLAN.md through research, planning, and verification. The skill can incorporate requirements or recorded design decisions, then check and revise the plan before presenting the results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning the next development phase
• Building a plan from requirements or design decisions
• Researching a phase before planning

Guide a development team from an assigned user outcome through implementation, testing, and handoff. It covers reproducing defects, checking behavior against requirements, involving design when needed, and reporting the exact changes, verification results, and remaining uncertainty.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Start implementation from the assigned user outcome
• Reproduce a defect and verify its repair
• Review delivered behavior against requirements

Design tests for charts, dashboards, and interactive diagrams. Combine data checks, component tests, screenshot comparisons, and end-to-end workflows to catch incorrect values, broken interactions, and visual changes while keeping tests stable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choose test coverage for a chart component
• Set up stable screenshot comparisons for a dashboard
• Verify mobile interactions and degraded network states

Design workflows for completing business lead records, verifying contact details, and ranking prospects against an ideal customer profile. Plan provider sequences in Clay, scoring rules, and data quality checks around lead volume, existing tools, and budget.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing a workflow to fill missing lead data
• Defining lead scores against an ideal customer profile
• Reviewing email verification when bounce rates rise

Guide feature development from a human-reviewed plan to testable requirements, implementation, and independent verification. Record each requirement with a concrete proof, then have a separate agent check the work and produce a verification report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Prepare a feature plan for human review
• Turn approved requirements into checks with concrete proof
• Implement a feature against agreed checks

Organize substantial tasks into a cycle of creation, independent review, and revision while preserving the original request. Turn broad quality goals into observable checks, collect evidence, and finish with verified results or a clearly identified blocker.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning vague quality goals into observable completion checks
• Coordinating independent workstreams and reviewers
• Comparing anonymous candidates against a shared benchmark

Retrieve Instagram profile details from a username, including the bio, follower and following counts, post count, verification status, and external link. Use the collected information to review an account’s profile and audience size.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check an account’s follower and following counts
• Collect profile bios and external links
• Check verification and business account status

Look up a company's Trustpilot profile using its domain to collect ratings, review counts, verification status, and contact details. Optional metrics show how the business responds to negative reviews, supporting company comparisons and reputation research.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare competitors' Trustpilot ratings
• Check suppliers' review reputation
• Add ratings and review counts to prospect lists

Check background type checks, tests, and builds in a Git worktree, a separate working directory. Read verification logs to see results, failure counts, and errors, with suggested next actions while development continues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking background verification while continuing development
• Reviewing type errors and failed test names
• Distinguishing running checks from checks that have not run

Checks code changes before a pull request by reviewing builds, types, coding rules, tests, potential secrets, and changed files. Produces a report showing results, test coverage, and issues that need fixing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking changes before opening a pull request
• Verifying a completed feature
• Reviewing code after refactoring

Delegate a focused coding, research, review, or verification task to a separate DevSpace agent. Choose an available worker, provide a self-contained brief, inspect or wait for results, and continue related work with the same agent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Requesting an independent correctness or security review
• Investigating a bounded part of a codebase
• Delegating an isolated change with clear acceptance criteria

Create a project-specific SKILL.md that teaches an agent how to launch, operate, and verify an app. It tests a representative workflow first, then records reliable steps, evidence of success, cleanup instructions, and maintenance guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Create a verification skill for a specific project
• Document proven workflows and evidence of success
• Record cleanup and maintenance steps for future checks

This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create a repo-local verification skill and exhaustive feature map for driving a real app through its UI, CLI, or API. Use for "create a verification skill", "make a verify skill for this repo", or "document how agents can verify this app".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[omh] Proof a change is done before merge: define and record build, lint, typecheck, test, security, docs, generated-output, and CI evidence before completion or merge. Use when the user says: verification-gate, verification gate, quality gate, release gate, test gate, build lint test, lint typecheck tests, verify before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a project-local skill that formally verifies the code where a bug costs the most and tests reach the least, in any language, with whichever verification tool fits. Use for /create-formal-verification-skill, "model-check this race", "prove this invariant", or when concurrency, retries, state machines, parsers, or unsafe code need more than tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or "audit the verify skill".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a control skill for this repo", "make a driver skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI/CLI/service behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a project-local skill that formally verifies the code where a bug costs the most and tests reach the least, in any language, with whichever verification tool fits. Use for /create-formal-verification-skill, "model-check this race", "prove this invariant", or when concurrency, retries, state machines, parsers, or unsafe code need more than tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a control skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI/CLI/service behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or "audit the verify skill".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.