772건 · 관련도순
Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill to guide collaborative writing for documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision records, PRDs, RFCs, operating guides, and structured memos. Trigger when the user wants help drafting, organizing, refining, reviewing, or testing a document before sharing it.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate, rewrite, and select WeChat Official Account article titles for open rate, depth, reader promise, and account tone. Use when drafting, reviewing, publishing, or revising公众号文章标题, especially when titles may be generic, stale, clickbait, AI-flavored, or misaligned with the article's commercial/editorial intent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project-level WeChat article drafting workflow for turning source materials, repo intakes, product notes, screenshots, or existing markdown into a publishable Chinese公众号 draft. Use for writing, rewriting, evidence-gating, title options, platform adaptation, and image planning before optional publishing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
WeChat article creator with Fu Sheng's writing style - conversational, story-driven, opinionated. Use this skill whenever the user mentions writing a WeChat article, drafting public account content, crafting a viral headline, creating article covers, writing in Fu Sheng's style, or any request involving 公众号, 微信文章, 爆款标题, or 傅盛风格 — even if they don't explicitly say "skill".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Draft or refine IDD-ready GitHub issues, roadmap issues, and sub-issues before the normal IDD execution loop begins. Use when a request is too large or ambiguous for one reviewable change, when work needs decomposition or dependency encoding, or when the user asks for issue drafting, roadmap planning, or parallelizable task breakdown.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when drafting, reviewing, or revising Xiaohongshu/Douyin/social-platform Chinese text so it has real internet-native judgment instead of README tone, technical-briefing tone, or mechanical meme-word stuffing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when splitting content work between a raw drafting model/window, an editor-in-chief, and the user's final taste review. It keeps prompts loose enough for judgment while preserving facts, account boundaries, and publish gates.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a team must define what its management system covers before a certification project, or its current scope is one vague sentence, and asks "write our ISMS scope", "what should be in scope", "can we exclude the sales office", "scope for the certificate", "draw the boundary of our management system" or "the auditor says our scope is unclear". Drafts the scope statement with boundaries, interfaces, dependencies and justified exclusions, for a security, privacy or AI management system, and writes a statement file plus a boundary table of open questions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a company needs a written risk assessment method before it builds or rescores a register, or when the current method produces registers where everything scores 3. Triggers: "write our risk methodology", "define likelihood and impact scales", "what is our risk appetite", "risk acceptance criteria", "who can accept a risk", "our auditor says the method is not repeatable", "risk matrix for our ISMS". Drafts a short method with likelihood and impact anchors in the company's own money, hours and records, a scoring rule, an acceptance threshold with an authority ladder, reassessment triggers, and a calibration test on five sample risks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a company needs rules for how staff use company systems, data, devices and AI tools, or asks "write our acceptable use policy", "AUP for employees", "can staff use ChatGPT at work", "AI usage policy", "BYOD rules", "remote work security rules" or "a policy people will actually read". Finds how people really work (devices, apps, AI tools, travel), puts the choices to the reader as decisions, drafts a short plain-language policy with concrete do and do not examples, and adds a comprehension check and an acknowledgement text for onboarding.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a risk register has treatment decisions but no plan anyone can execute, or when someone asks "write the risk treatment plan", "turn the risk register into actions", "what do we do about our high risks", "treatment plan for the auditor", "budget the security roadmap from the risks" or "our treatment plan is just a list of controls". Turns each reduce, avoid or transfer decision into dated actions with an owner, budget, dependency and the record that will prove it was done, states the expected residual score and why, and adds interim measures for risks that stay high while the work runs. Writes a CSV plan and a short notes file.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a company has no incident response plan, has one copied from a template that names teams it does not have, or an auditor, customer or insurer asks for it, and the team says "write our incident response plan", "IR plan", "security incident procedure", "who does what in an incident", "incident playbooks", "contact tree for incidents" or "our plan failed in the last incident". Drafts a plan sized to the company with roles and deputies, a severity scale, a contact tree with an out-of-band channel, one-page playbooks for the likely scenarios, evidence handling and a notification decision step, plus a one-page quick reference card.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rules, conventions, and constraints for formatting git commit messages and committing at logical boundaries. Trigger when: - Drafting, revising, or validating git commit messages. - Pausing at commit boundaries under the CORE or CONTINUE workflows. - Evaluating whether a changeset should be split into multiple commits. - Prompt contains keywords: commit message, git commit, conventional commits, commit hygiene, commit guidelines, logical boundary, spaghetti diff, atomic commit, commit boundary.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Quick one-shot lookup over Ahmad's OpenMark bookmark knowledge graph (15k+ items from Edge, LinkedIn, YouTube, Raindrop). Use whenever Ahmad asks "find my bookmarks on X", "what did I save about X", "anything in OpenMark about X", or any single-topic search where he wants results in under 10 seconds. NOT for newsletter drafting or deep research — for those use openmark-deep-research or openmark-newsletter. Triggers on "find my", "what did I save", "openmark", "my bookmarks", "search bookmarks".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Start a working doc — a drafting space where spec-level and implementation thinking co-exist before splitting into specs, plan, and test cases
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Workshop the shape of this project — audience, components, ambiguities — before drafting the PRD
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Checks a master document register extract for gaps and returns a DRAFT question list for document control: missing or out-of-sequence revisions, overdue or slipping deliverables, numbering that breaks the project convention, duplicates and incomplete rows, each with row, test and quoted evidence. Never edits the register, re-baselines a date or marks a deliverable complete. Use when the user asks to "check the MDR", "find the gaps in the deliverables list" or "prepare questions on the drawing register". Do not use for drafting a transmittal from a document list, use transmittal-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check, search or digest Gmail across several mailboxes over the owner's own OAuth connector, with no browser and near-zero tokens for the raw pull. Read-only by default: drafting and sending go through the outbound approval gate. Triggers: "/gmail", "check mail", "any important emails", "find the email about <X>".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when evaluating, designing, drafting, revising, stress-testing, or preparing academic articles, empirical research reports, literature reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, journal submissions, reviewer responses, research methods, sampling, measurement, analysis, publication readiness, or citation/source audits.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "build programmatic SEO pages", "generate pages at scale", "rank on a high-authority third-party site", "borrow domain authority", "build a vs / alternative page", "do local SEO", "optimize a Google Business Profile", or "fix NAP" — one page-build router with four modes: programmatic (template × dataset systems), parasite (barnacle publishing on Medium/Reddit/LinkedIn/GitHub), comparison (vs / alternative pages in four formats), and local (GBP + NAP + citations + location pages), each with its own thin/duplicate, honesty, or reputation-abuse guardrail. Not for finding what to target — use keyword-research or content-gap-analysis; not for drafting one standalone article — use content-writer; not for scoring a page for publish — use content-quality-auditor. 程序化SEO/批量页面/寄生SEO/借势权重/对比页/vs页/替代页/本地SEO/谷歌商家档案/NAP一致性
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.