738건 · 관련도순
Extract and consolidate reusable components, design tokens, and patterns into your design system. Identifies opportunities for systematic reuse and enriches your component library. Use when the user asks to create components, refactor repeated UI patterns, build a design system, or extract tokens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user requests to create or customize an academic personal website from a GitHub template repository. This skill handles the complete workflow of forking academic template repositories (like academicpages.github.io), extracting structured personal information from memory or provided data, and systematically updating configuration files (_config.yml), navigation menus (_data/navigation.yml), content pages (_pages/about.md), and publication listings (_publications/). It specifically handles academic profiles including personal details, education background, research experience, publications, skills, and contact information. Triggers include requests to 'fork and customize academic homepage', 'build personal academic website', 'create research portfolio', or 'set up GitHub pages with academic template'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user requests information about academic benchmarks, datasets, or research papers, particularly in machine learning, deep learning, or logical reasoning domains. This skill enables systematic research of academic benchmarks by searching web sources, downloading and analyzing arXiv papers, extracting key metadata (number of tasks, training availability, difficulty levels), and compiling comparative summaries. It triggers on requests involving dataset comparisons, benchmark analysis, or academic paper research for table creation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Abductive analysis for qualitative interview data following Timmermans & Tavory. Guides you through theory-first analysis that recognizes anomalies and generates novel theoretical insights through systematic puzzle exploration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
5W1H Decision Framework Tool. Use for: (1) Systematic decision-making before creating todos, (2) Preventing duplicate implementation, (3) Detecting avoidance behavior, (4) Ensuring agile refactor compliance with executor/dispatcher separation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Diagnose and improve humor using systems thinking. Use when jokes fall flat, when humor feels forced, when punchlines don't land, or when you want to systematically enhance comedic writing. Treats jokes as engineerable connection systems.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply systematic performance optimization techniques when writing or reviewing code. Use when optimizing hot paths, reducing latency, improving throughput, fixing performance regressions, or when the user mentions performance, optimization, speed, latency, throughput, profiling, or benchmarking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns. This skill should be used when the user asks about 'architecture decision', 'ADR', 'design pattern selection', 'technology choice', or needs to evaluate architectural trade-offs. Keywords: architecture, ADR, patterns, trade-offs, technical debt, quality attributes, decision record.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic performance profiling and optimization methodology. Covers CPU profiling, memory profiling, heap analysis, goroutine/thread analysis, FlameGraph generation, latency profiling, database query profiling, network I/O profiling, and continuous performance regression detection. USE WHEN: investigating performance issues, optimizing slow code, reducing memory usage, diagnosing GC/CPU bottlenecks, finding N+1 queries, analyzing pprof/flamegraph output, or establishing a performance baseline. Triggers on "profiling", "performance analysis", "slow code", "flame graph", "pprof", "heap dump", "memory leak", "CPU spike", "bottleneck".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Breaks down trading ideas into component parts for systematic Pine Script implementation. Use when analyzing trading concepts, decomposing strategies, planning indicator features, or extracting ideas from YouTube videos. Triggers on conceptual questions, "how would I build", YouTube URLs, or video analysis requests.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic Power BI performance troubleshooting prompt for identifying, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues in Power BI models, reports, and queries.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and resolve production issues. The intelligent debugging strategy combines automated root cause analysis with human expertise, using modern 2024/2025 practices including AI code assistants (GitHub Copilot, Claude Code), observability platforms (Sentry, DataDog, OpenTelemetry), git bisect automation for ...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
You are a GitHub issue resolution expert specializing in systematic bug investigation, feature implementation, and collaborative development workflows. Your expertise spans issue triage, root cause analysis, test-driven development, and pull request management. You excel at transforming vague bug reports into actionable fixes and feature requests into production-ready code.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematically remove malware, backdoors, and attacker persistence mechanisms from infected systems while ensuring complete eradication and preventing re-infection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematically deobfuscate multi-layer PowerShell malware using AST analysis, dynamic tracing, and tools like PSDecode and PowerDecode to reveal hidden payloads and C2 infrastructure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematically collects, categorizes, and distributes indicators of compromise (IOCs) during and after security incidents to enable detection, blocking, and threat intelligence sharing. Covers network, host, email, and behavioral indicators using STIX/TAXII formats and threat intelligence platforms. Activates for requests involving IOC collection, indicator extraction, threat indicator sharing, compromise indicators, STIX export, or IOC enrichment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.