'interview' 검색 결과

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Help users discover what to build on Stellar. Use when a user says "what should I build on Stellar", "Stellar app ideas", "I want to build on Stellar but don't know what", "Stellar startup ideas", "find me a Stellar project idea", "I'm new to Stellar and want to build something", or "what's hot on Stellar right now". Interviews user sharply, then proposes ranked ideas grounded in real ecosystem gaps from the LumenLoop 728-project database and current SCF funding patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interviews the user section by section to collaboratively produce design documents. Use when creating a design doc, starting feature design, or when the user invokes the design command.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

インタビュー文字起こしと質問リストから詳細な議事録を作成するスキル。「インタビュー議事録を作成して」「インタビューメモから議事録を作って」「ヒアリング内容を整理して」「文字起こしから議事録を作って」などのリクエスト時に使用。インタビュー・ヒアリング・文字起こしが対象。会議やミーティングの議事録には meeting-minutes-creator を使用すること。質問リスト（.md/.txt）とインタビュー文字起こし（音声認識出力など）を入力として、プロフィール、ファクトサマリ、インタビュー内容、逐語録を含む包括的な議事録を生成する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

クライアントの与件情報と打ち合わせメモから、意思決定に直結する調査プロジェクト提案書（スライド骨子/Markdown）を一発で作成するスキル。「提案書を作成して」「提案書を作って」「プロポーザルを作成して」などの依頼、または与件ファイル（例：与件.md）を指定して提案書作成を依頼された場合に使用する。単なる章立てではなく、調査の観点・仮説・参入障壁や供給構造・会議転用可能なアウトプットまで落として提案する。インプットや指示からデプスインタビューが必要と推測できる場合のみ、インタビュー前提の設計を含める。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

提案書と初期調査結果からインタビューガイド（質問リスト）を作成するスキル。「インタビューガイドを作成して」「質問リストを作って」「ヒアリング項目を整理して」などのリクエスト時に使用。提案書の論点に対応した検証・補強事項を整理し、想定インタビュー対象者のペルソナと具体的な質問設計を行う。論点に対して明確な答えを得られる構成で設計する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

インタビューガイドの対象者タイプと候補者リストから最適な対象者を選定・評価するスキル。「インタビュー対象者を選定して」「候補者を評価して」「エキスパートリストから対象者を選んで」などのリクエスト時に使用。論点への対応力を軸に適合性を評価し、優先順位付けされた推奨候補リストを作成する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare a request to change the terms of a Japanese job offer before accepting it, sorting what the user wants changed (pay components, start date, work style, location, title, probation) by priority, tying each ask to a basis the user can show (the written offer, the job posting, what was said in interviews, their own records), working the timing back from the acceptance deadline, and drafting the message to the employer or recruiting agent. Use when a user has an offer and wants to ask for higher pay, a later start date, more remote days, or other changed terms, or wants to know how to raise it without losing the offer; do not use to predict whether the request will succeed, to set a target figure from market rates, to fabricate a competing offer, to decide whether to accept, or to send anything to the employer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Check the working conditions of a Japanese job offer item by item against the conditions an employer states in writing, compare the offer letter or 労働条件通知書 with the job posting and what was said in interviews, and separate what is confirmed in writing from what is still only verbal. Use when a user has received an offer, a working-conditions notice, or an employment contract and wants to know what is missing, what conflicts with earlier statements, and what to confirm before the acceptance deadline; do not use to rule on whether the terms are lawful, to decide whether to accept or decline, or to contact the employer on the user's behalf.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Lay out how a job search will actually run alongside a current job: the hours available each week and what they go to, how weekday daytime slots for interviews will be found, which routes to use (direct applications, job boards, scout sites, agents, referrals, public employment services) and what each one discloses to whom, how to keep the search from reaching the current employer through public profiles or workplace equipment, a single tracker of every application's stage, next action, and deadline, and a date and conditions for reviewing, reducing, or pausing the search. Use when someone has decided to start looking, or to gather information while employed, and asks how to fit it in, which routes to use, whether the applications they are running fit the time they have, or how to keep track of them; do not use to decide whether to change jobs, to pick or rate employers or job postings, to predict outcomes, or to send applications, publish profiles, or contact agents on the user's behalf.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan the first months at a new Japanese employer after an offer is accepted, listing every expectation and promise made in interviews, the offer, or negotiation with its source, separating what is in writing from what was only said and what has no agreed measure, working out when the probation period ends and whether its criteria and conditions are known, and scheduling who to confirm what with before and after the start date. Use when a user has accepted an offer and wants to prepare for joining, make sure verbal promises such as remote days or a future role are confirmed, or understand what the probation period means for them; do not use to predict whether they will fit in or pass probation, to judge their manager or colleagues, to rule on the legality of probation terms, or to contact the new employer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interview the user in rounds until no branch of the design tree stays open.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A serif-led magazine aesthetic: terracotta accent on warm off-white paper. Good for long-form, editorial, and brand-led marketing pages. "A New Yorker interview column online.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to evolve the features of a PRD roadmap with user stories — 'refinar as histórias da feature', 'escrever histórias de usuário', 'critérios de aceite', 'regras de negócio da feature', 'deixar a feature pronta', 'user stories for FT01' — one feature at a time, interviewing the human until each story meets the Definition of Ready: persona, value, INVEST, CA (Gherkin, happy and error paths) and RN from the PRD. Do NOT use to create the roadmap (prd-roadmap) or to change requirements without stories (prd-refine).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants a new Product Requirements Document — 'criar um PRD', 'escrever os requisitos de', 'new PRD for', 'documento de requisitos' — through a 12-step interview, one question at a time, ending with an approval gate. Do NOT use to change an existing PRD (prd- refine) or to plan implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants a full feature action plan (backend + frontend + tests) with the PWDEVIA 7-question method before any code is written — 'planejar a feature X', 'criar plano de feature', 'plan the user CRUD'. Interviews the human (max 2 rounds) and writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use to write code (feat-exec), for small 1–3 file changes (feat-quick), backend-only or UI-only scope (feat-backend / feat-frontend), tests for existing code (feat-test) or code review (feat-review).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discover and approve feature requirements through focused interviewing and repository research. Use when the user has a feature idea, unclear scope, conflicting requirements, or needs Flow context artifacts before design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see page-cro.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a tailored AGENTS.md for any new project by interviewing the user about their skill gaps, project goals, and tech context. Load when the user asks to set up a project, initialize agents, create an AGENTS.md, bootstrap a repo, onboard agents to a codebase, or says "set up this project for agents". Also triggers on "write an AGENTS.md for this project", "configure agents for my repo", "project bootstrap", "agent onboarding", or when the user starts a new project and needs agent-ready configuration. Re-run when new context arrives (PRD written, stack changes, team changes) to update the AGENTS.md.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a structured discovery interview and produce a complete, developer-ready Product Requirements Document. Load when the user asks to write a PRD, create product requirements, document a feature, define user stories with acceptance criteria, or turn a rough idea into a formal product requirements document. Also triggers on "document this feature", "write requirements for", "create a one-pager", "turn this into a PRD", "I need a PRD for", or any request to produce a structured product document for stakeholder alignment or engineering handoff. Supports Full PRD, Lean PRD, and One-Pager formats. Note: for executable feature specifications (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then consumable by AI coding agents), route to `feature-spec` instead — PRDs frame the product, feature-specs encode the implementable contract.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a structured retrospective after development-phase runs of your product's agents — interview the owner in plain language about what went well and poorly, draft ranked improvement hypotheses, then design and run small n=1/n=2 experiments with pre-declared success criteria, guardrails, stop conditions, and a cost/ROI kill-switch. Load when the user says how did that run go, retro this run, the agent output was bad, what should we improve, draft hypotheses, run a small experiment, or after repeated dev runs of an agentic system produce uneven quality. Priority: output quality over performance over cost, each with diminishing-returns stops. NOT a product A/B test (experimentation), NOT coding-agent harness repair (harness-evolution), NOT production-scale learning (runtime-learning-loop).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automate recruiting and hiring workflows in Ashby -- manage candidates, jobs, applications, interviews, and notes through natural language commands.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.