'bugs' 검색 결과

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage issues through a state machine driven by triage roles. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Subagent flow for deep-reading GitHub issues + their linked/closing PRs to the bottom. Captures CURRENT state, maintainer status updates, reporter repro, blocking reviewer concerns, hidden second bugs, cross-repo duplicates. Invoked by weekly-report orchestrator; runs as a general-purpose subagent so the orchestrator's context stays small.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review the current branch for bugs, intent fit, and test coverage; run or write tests; commit focused work; open or update a PR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design, implement, and evaluate risk-based software tests across unit, integration, contract, end-to-end, and regression layers. Use when adding tests, reproducing bugs, improving coverage, diagnosing flaky tests, or defining a test strategy; do not use to change production behavior unless the user also requests implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage issues through a state machine driven by triage roles. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Exploratory QA of web apps: find bugs, evidence, reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trace bugs backward to their origin, not just symptoms

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-layer validation to catch bugs before they escape

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Bug hunter. Reproduces bugs with failing tests (RED), then fixes with TDD. Accepts a prompt, issue URL, or bug description. Use when: bugfix, fix bug, debug, broken, regression, failing, doesn't work, fix this.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user shares a Sentry error, Jira bug ticket, or error description and wants root cause analysis. Also for proactive bug hunting and code audits for hidden bugs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drive QA of a SwiftUI app on a real iPhone over USB - screenshot, read the accessibility tree, inspect @Observable state, tap, swipe, and type through an HTTP bridge embedded in the app under test. Use when asked to test an iOS app on a physical device, find bugs on the device, or expose a connected iPhone to a remote agent over Tailscale. Requires the ios-agent-qa runtime; not for simulator or XCTest work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[Workflow] Investigate and fix bugs, crashes or regressions at the root cause, with reviewed changes and regression tests that prove the fix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[Process] Use when a developer needs to understand and judge scoped work: a change set, subsystem, decision, plan or concept — flow, rationale, trade-offs, testing. Bugs: investigate --mode=debug; one feature's code flow: investigate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn 'should never happen' into 'cannot happen' by defining owned inductive invariants and enforcing them at parse/construct/API/DB/lock/txn boundaries with a verification signal. Use when prompts mention invariants, impossible states, validation sprawl, cache/index drift, idempotency/versioning, retries/duplicates/out-of-order events, race/linearization bugs, loop correctness, or hardening another workflow (for example /tw-fix) with invariant checks first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform comprehensive exploratory testing on a website using browser automation, covering user journeys, forms, errors, accessibility, responsiveness, performance, and security basics. Use when asked to QA a site, explore an app, find bugs, or produce a browser testing report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a targeted fresh-eyes blunder pass over code, specs, plans, reviews, closure gates, or skill edits. Use when asked to reread with fresh eyes, find obvious bugs, catch mistakes/oversights/omissions, check for embarrassing misses, or do a second independent pass before closure. Use it as the final falsification/check pass for another workflow, not as a substitute for implementation or verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.