8.3천건 · 관련도순
Batch-generate Dreamifly images/videos from prompt queues. Use when the user asks to batch-generate images, edit images with references, create text-to-video or image-to-video, validate or estimate Dreamifly job cost, retry failed media jobs, or summarize Dreamifly outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Professional, ethical HR partner for hiring, onboarding/offboarding, PTO and leave, performance, compliant policies, and employee relations. Ask for jurisdiction and company context before advising; produce structured, bias-mitigated, lawful templates.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Serializes data. System.Text.Json source generators, Protobuf, MessagePack, AOT-safe patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Efficient code navigation using Serena MCP symbol operations instead of text search
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
EF Core, DbContext, AsNoTracking, query splitting.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI-powered skill recommendation engine for dotnet-harness. Analyzes project context and recommends relevant skills based on detected frameworks, packages, and patterns. Triggers on: recommend skill, suggest skills, what skill should I use, skill suggestion, project analysis recommendation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI-powered skill recommendation engine for dotnet-agent-harness. Analyzes project context and recommends relevant skills based on detected frameworks, packages, and patterns. Triggers on: recommend skill, suggest skills, what skill should I use, skill suggestion, project analysis recommendation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Resume work from previous session with full context restoration
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manage persistent context threads for cross-session work
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Route freeform text to the right GSD command automatically
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check project progress, show context, and route to next action (execute or plan)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (the agent picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create context handoff when pausing work mid-phase
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Initialize a new project with deep context gathering and PROJECT.md
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Tests APIs for injection vulnerabilities including SQL injection, NoSQL injection, OS command injection, LDAP injection, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through API parameters, headers, and request bodies. The tester crafts malicious payloads targeting different backend technologies and injection contexts to extract data, execute commands, or access internal services. Maps to OWASP API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration and API7:2023 SSRF. Activates for requests involving API injection testing, SQLi in APIs, NoSQL injection, SSRF testing, or API input validation assessment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Identifies and exploits insecure local data storage vulnerabilities in Android and iOS mobile applications including unencrypted databases, world-readable files, insecure SharedPreferences, plaintext credential storage, and improper keychain/keystore usage. Use when performing mobile penetration testing focused on OWASP M9 (Insecure Data Storage) or assessing compliance with MASVS-STORAGE requirements. Activates for requests involving mobile data storage security, local storage exploitation, SharedPreferences analysis, or mobile data leakage assessment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Deploy AI and NLP-powered detection systems to identify business email compromise attacks by analyzing writing style, behavioral patterns, and contextual anomalies that evade traditional rule-based filters.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Collects and synthesizes open-source intelligence (OSINT) about threat actors, malicious infrastructure, and attack campaigns using publicly available data sources, passive reconnaissance tools, and dark web monitoring. Use when investigating external threat actor infrastructure, performing pre-engagement reconnaissance for authorized red team assessments, or enriching CTI reports with publicly available adversary context. Activates for requests involving Maltego, Shodan, OSINT framework, SpiderFoot, or infrastructure reconnaissance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using SOAR platforms, Python pipelines, or TIP playbooks to reduce analyst triage time and standardize enrichment outputs. Use when building automated enrichment workflows integrated with SIEM alerts, email submission pipelines, or bulk IOC processing from threat feeds. Activates for requests involving SOAR enrichment, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, Python enrichment pipelines, or automated IOC processing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes structured and unstructured threat intelligence feeds to extract actionable indicators, adversary tactics, and campaign context. Use when ingesting commercial or open-source CTI feeds, evaluating feed quality, normalizing data into STIX 2.1 format, or enriching existing IOCs with campaign attribution. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, MISP, AlienVault OTX, or automated feed aggregation pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Full review of a PR, a file, or pasted text against the OpenMetadata Writing Style Guide checklist, plus checking every checkable claim for internal consistency against the diff/PR itself. One combined report, not separate passes. Does not fetch or verify against any external source repository. Link-checking is out of scope; a separate broken-links job covers that. Only runs on explicit /content-review invocation, never self-triggered.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.