본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills

'common' 검색 결과

1천건 · 관련도순

Harden LDAP directory services against common attacks including credential harvesting, LDAP injection, anonymous binding, and channel binding bypass. Covers LDAPS enforcement, channel binding, LDAP si

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Review implementation for common security vulnerabilities

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

beyondessential/tamanu92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turns a control list and an audit scope into draft evidence requests grouped by control owner, each with the control as stated, the audit period, evidence examples (commonly requested) and a proposed due date derived from the fieldwork dates. Never judges whether evidence is sufficient, never selects the sample and never sends a request; the auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the evidence requests", "draft the PBC list", "build the evidence request pack for the audit" or "what do we need to ask each control owner for". Do not use for document requests and interview questions built from an audit plan, use audit-prep-pack instead; to check claims in a report against sources, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

kesslernity/awesome-copilot-agent-skills92026년 9월 19일 업데이트

- Recover deleted, edited or historical web content using the Wayback Machine and its CDX API, archive.today, Common Crawl… Use when a page is deleted, changed or 404s, checking what a site used to say, finding old team or staff pages, prior pricing, removed posts, pre-redaction wording or old contact details, enumerating every archived URL for a domain, or preserving evidence before it disappears

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Diagnose common Cognitum Seed device issues — won't pair, no WiFi, firmware stuck, MCP tools not appearing in Claude Code. Use when the user reports a Seed-related symptom and asks "why isn't this working?".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ruvnet/cognitum-claude-plugin92026년 4월 30일 업데이트

共通手順

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

haru860/takumi-method-agent92026년 3월 12일 업데이트

Apply a set of Rosetta Stone attribute mappings to a Narrative dataset by wrapping them in a one-shot workflow that calls the `CreateRosettaStoneMappingsIfNotExist` task. Consumes the structured output of `/generate-rosetta-stone-mappings`, normalizes the generator's snake_case to the workflow task's camelCase, re-validates every expression against the dataset's current schema, gates on user approval, submits via `narrative_workflows_create`, polls the triggered run, and reports per-mapping created / conflict / failed. Use when: "apply these mappings to dataset N", "create the Rosetta Stone mappings I just generated", "push the mappings I saved earlier to <dataset>", "productionize this mapping list", "submit the suggested_mappings array". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

write-nql

무료

Write, validate, and (optionally) execute an NQL query against a Narrative dataset. Drafts the query from the user's question, runs `narrative_nql_validate` until it compiles, explains the query in plain English, and only runs it on explicit approval (or when invoked with `--run`). Use when: "write an NQL query for X", "query this dataset", "validate this NQL", "run NQL against dataset <id>", "how many rows match Y", "show me the top N records from <dataset>". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Author and submit a Narrative workflow from a natural-language intent. Picks the closest example from `assets/examples/`, adapts it to the user's case, walks the YAML against the spec, resolves the data plane, and submits via `narrative_workflows_create` only after the user has approved the rendered spec. Use when: "create a workflow that does X", "schedule a daily refresh of dataset Y", "wrap this NQL as a workflow", "build a pipeline that creates view A then refreshes view B", "submit this workflow YAML", "productionize this query as a recurring job". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generate, evaluate, and improve Rosetta Stone attribute mappings for a Narrative dataset. Use when: "map this dataset to Rosetta Stone", "suggest normalized attributes for dataset N", "evaluate the mappings on dataset N", "why is this mapping low confidence", "fix this expression", "improve this NQL mapping expression". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Produce a coverage & quality profile of a Narrative dataset (or access rule): row count, per-column null/fill rate, cardinality, ranges, top-values, inferred column shape, and quality flags. Reads bundled stats + sample first, recovers missing/stale stats by configuring and recalculating them, and escalates to a cheap `/write-nql` query only for a measure no stat can provide. Descriptive, not prescriptive. Use when: "profile dataset N", "what does dataset N look like", "coverage and quality of <dataset>", "what id types does N emit", "null rates / cardinality for <dataset>", "is this dataset's stats fresh". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "scope this analytical question". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Find the canonical Rosetta Stone attribute that best matches a fuzzy description, semantic phrase, or required schema shape. Searches the catalog with pagination, describes the shortlist in one batched call, ranks candidates by name + shape match, and returns the canonical attribute ID plus close alternatives. Use when: "find the X attribute", "what's the graph-edge attribute ID", "look up the email Rosetta Stone attribute", "search the attribute catalog for Y", "which attribute has SOURCE_ID + TARGET_ID + IS_DIRECTED". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Register a Snowflake table or view as a Narrative dataset from SQL, with no Configuration screen and no browser. Not for installing or configuring the native app, and not for querying a dataset that already exists. Use when: "register this table as a dataset", "register a Snowflake dataset from SQL", "onboard my_table to Narrative", "script dataset registration", "add this view to my data plane". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace92026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the ECSS European space standards: the E-ST-10 system engineering family, the discipline standards a reader commonly mis-cites (radiation is E-ST-10-12, not a RAM standard; software is E-ST-40, not E-ST-70), the M-branch project management standards, the Q-branch product assurance standards, and the sustainability and system documents, with designation, edition, owner, status, and catalogue URL only. Contains no source content. Free process paths are existing NASA packs in this catalogue, named by slug, and are not ECSS clause substitutes. Several needs have no in-repo pack.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Modeling Handbook for Systems Engineering (NASA-HDBK-1009A Rev A, 2025). Use for model-based systems engineering (MBSE) wired into NASA's NPR 7123.1 SE processes: the three aspects of MBSE (language / methodology / framework), the NASA SE Engine and its two OOSEM-derived steps (Model Planning, Setting Up the Model), the Modeling Plan as a SEMP subset, the tool-agnostic NASA SE metamodel of elements and relationships across the four SysML pillars (structure / behavior / requirements / parametrics), worked SysML diagrams and tables for stakeholders, requirements, structure and V&V, generating SE work products (ConOps, MOE, MOP, TPM, V&V), the MBSE Grid framework, alternative modeling approaches (PBR, Scenario, System Specification, Verification), and the ConOps model-content template. Scope is bounded to four common technical processes (Stakeholder Expectation Definition, Technical Requirements Definition, Product Verification, Product Validation). Does NOT teach SysML itself, mandate a tool, define NPR 7123.1 processes, cover technical-management processes 10-17, or reproduce the OMG SysML specification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Knowledge base from FAA-STD-025f (Preparation of Interface Documentation). Use for IRD/ICD family definitions, common format and content, IRD shall-requirements, ICD design characteristics, verification/VRTM, and CM/revision/approval of FAA Enterprise Subsystem interfaces. Covers rev F preparation rules only; does not replace FAA-STD-005 drawing/spec prep, Order 1800.66 full CM procedures, or non-FAA interface standards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

nasa-pra

무료

Knowledge base from the NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421, 2nd ed.). Use for quantitative PRA of aerospace and safety-critical systems: the risk triplet and scenario logic stack (MLD, ESD, event trees, fault trees, minimal cut sets), Bayesian data collection and parameter estimation, aleatory/epistemic uncertainty modeling and common-cause failure (Alpha Factor, beta-factor, CCBE), human reliability analysis (THERP, CREAM, NARA, SPAR-H), context-based software risk (CSRM), physics-based and structural/phenomenological models (stress-strength, limit states, FORM/SORM, NASGRO, range safety), uncertainty propagation and importance measures (F-V, RAW, Birnbaum, DIM), and launch-abort modeling with worked PRA examples. This is the QUANTITATIVE engine beneath NASA's risk doctrine — for the qualitative RIDM/CRM decision framework use the nasa-risk pack. Thin on programme management, organisational risk governance, and non-aerospace regulatory contexts; aerospace-focused and anchored to the 2011 second edition.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Knowledge base from MIL-STD-881F (13 May 2022), DoD Standard Practice for Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items. Use for Program/Contract/Subcontract WBS construction, 100% rule and dictionary discipline, commodity appendices A–J, Common Elements (K), sustainment CES reporting (L), Government ST&E (M), and RFP/post-award implementation. Technical planning & WBS and PM/measurement focus—not a cost manual substitute for CAPE policy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7123.1D — Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements. Use for the 17 common SE processes (SE Engine), life-cycle reviews and entrance/success criteria, SEMP structure and content, ETA roles and tailoring/customizing rules, Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9), SE work product maturity terminology, contracted project oversight, and MOE/MOP/TPM measurement frameworks. Does not cover NASA programme financial management, human spaceflight medical standards, or software engineering requirements in depth (see NPR 7150.2 for the latter).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook (NASA/SP-2016-6105 Rev 2). Use for NASA's systems-engineering process model — the SE Engine and 17 common technical processes, the program/project life cycle (Pre-Phase A through F), Key Decision Points and technical reviews (MCR/SRR/PDR/CDR/…), stakeholder expectations, technical requirements, design solution, product verification and validation, and crosscutting technical management (planning, risk, configuration, interfaces, data, assessment, decision analysis). Strong for aerospace/spaceflight project SE and lifecycle gating; NASA-specific terminology (KDPs, NPR 7123.1).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

IRS Schedule C (Form 1040) expense category reference — every line from 8 to 27a with what belongs, what doesn't, and common mistakes. Covers COGS (Part III), operating expenses (Part II), and Form 8829 business use of home. Trigger on "what Schedule C line", "which expense category", "where does this go on Schedule C", "is this deductible".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Receiptor-AI/bookkeeping-skills82026년 6월 3일 업데이트

Rules for deducting business meals at 50%, required documentation (who, what, where, why), entertainment at 0% since TCJA 2018, on-premises meals going to 0% in 2026, and common mistakes. Trigger on "deduct a meal", "business lunch", "client dinner deductible", "meals deduction", "entertainment deduction", "can I write off this dinner".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Receiptor-AI/bookkeeping-skills82026년 6월 3일 업데이트