'bugs' 검색 결과

Test-driven development for Spring Boot using JUnit 5, Mockito, MockMvc, Testcontainers, and JaCoCo. Use when adding features, fixing bugs, or refactoring.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic debugging methodology covering root cause analysis, log-based debugging, production debugging, memory leak diagnosis, deadlock detection, performance anomaly investigation, and reproducible bug reproduction. Distilled from real experience at Google, DeepMind, ByteDance, and Huawei. USE WHEN: investigating production incidents, debugging hard-to-reproduce bugs, analyzing crash dumps, finding race conditions, diagnosing memory leaks, debugging performance regressions, or any situation requiring systematic root cause analysis. Triggers on "debugging", "root cause", "bug", "crash", "segfault", "deadlock", "race condition", "memory leak".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Two superpowers for AI agents: a collective brain and a Base ecosystem mentor. BRAIN: Before debugging/compiling/architecting, search for existing solutions. After solving, propose so no agent repeats your mistake. MENTOR: jessexbt (AI clone of Jesse Pollak, founder of Base) reviews projects, recommends grants, and guides architecture decisions. Consult him directly when building on Base/crypto/onchain/web3. Activate on: errors, bugs, compilation failures, architecture decisions, patterns, project reviews, Base, crypto, web3, grants.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, Claude 4.5 Sonnet) with battle-tested platforms (SonarQube, CodeQL, Semgrep) to identify bugs, vulnerabilities, and performance issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Debugs Windows apps via WinDbg MCP. Crash, hang, high-CPU, and memory triage from dumps or live attach.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Base implementation skill for this repository across .NET/C#, backend APIs, database/ORM, frontend Vue/Quasar, and Rust with Clean Architecture rules. Use when the user asks to build features, fix bugs, refactor modules, or improve code-level performance, and use specialized skills as inheritance layers when available.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform repository-aware code reviews focused on bugs, regressions, architectural violations, missing tests, and operational risks. Use when the user asks for review of diffs, pull requests, patches, or implementation quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code implementation, refactoring, and bugfixes for create-vue-dsfr. Use for implementing features, refactoring code, or fixing bugs. Read the shared project skill before acting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code implementation, refactoring, and bugfixes. USE FOR: implementing features; refactoring code; fixing bugs; modifying existing code. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests (separate skill); documentation (separate skill); commit conventions (separate skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when wiring shadcn/ui primitives, forms or admin UI in site-os — the component mechanics, the VBField validation layer, and the UI bugs that have actually shipped here. For brand identity (colour, type, logo, voice) load brand instead; that skill wins on any disagreement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building, testing or previewing site-os — the BUILD_TARGET=stable dist directory, the four verification gates (build, test, env:check, brand:check), the preview servers on :3000 and :3100, and the failure modes that look like bugs but are not.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose user-reported AILI/ROSE harness or workflow behavior problems without editing files; use when the user says a command, skill trigger, subagent packet, memory flow, installer, docs, or agent prompt behavior is wrong and wants to know where the issue lives and how to fix it. Do not use for normal product-code bugs; return any approved modification need to ROSE.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Time-of-Check / Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition exploitation methodology across binary, kernel, filesystem, web, and container layers. Covers symbolic-link races (open/access/stat split), file-descriptor races, fopen/realpath traversal races, /proc and procfs races, FUSE-backed slow-fs races to widen the window, ptrace and signal races, kernel double-fetch / userspace pointer races, container/runc/symlink escape primitives, kubernetes admission/authz TOCTOU, web auth-vs-authz TOCTOU, JWT-claim TOCTOU at gateway vs service, payment/idempotency races, and modern race-amplification techniques (single-packet attack, slow loris, FUSE pause, cgroup freeze, scheduler shaping). Use when you've identified a 'check then act' pattern in code, when fuzzing for race conditions, or when exploiting concurrency bugs in privileged binaries / kernel / orchestrators.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

SSO bugs frequently pay High–Critical. XML parsers are notoriously inconsistent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Race condition (TOCTOU) testing checklist: identifying timing windows, Burp Suite Turbo Intruder, Last-Byte sync technique, rate limit bypass, double-spend attacks, and concurrent request exploitation. Use for web app race condition testing or bug bounty time-of-check-to-time-of-use bugs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Hunt Open Redirect — all types including low-impact, chained to OAuth token theft → ATO, phishing chains. URL parameter manipulation, JavaScript redirect, meta refresh, header injection. Use when hunting redirect bugs or building ATO chains.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Hunting skill for race condition vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports including modern HTTP/2 single-packet attack cases (James Kettle DEF CON 2023 'Smashing the State Machine'; RyotaK / Flatt Security 10,000-request first-sequence-sync expansion 2024). Covers coupon double-redemption, gift-card double-spend, MFA-OTP-validate race, account-create race, faucet/crypto token double-mint, email-activation race, vote/upvote inflation, password-reset token race, rate-limit bypass via concurrent requests. Use when hunting race conditions, TOCTOU bugs, MFA-bypass-via-timing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.