Design and implement systematic checklists that reduce errors by 30-50% in complex, high-stakes domains (medicine, aviation, construction, finance). NOT for simple tasks or when comprehensive instruction is needed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
9.2천건 · 관련도순
Design and implement systematic checklists that reduce errors by 30-50% in complex, high-stakes domains (medicine, aviation, construction, finance). NOT for simple tasks or when comprehensive instruction is needed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Automatically intercepts and optimizes prompts using the prompt-learning MCP server. Learns from performance over time via embedding-indexed history. Uses APE, OPRO, DSPy patterns. Activate on "optimize prompt", "improve this prompt", "prompt engineering", or ANY complex task request. Requires prompt-learning MCP server. NOT for simple questions (just answer them), NOT for direct commands (just execute them), NOT for conversational responses (no optimization needed).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
license: Apache-2.0 NOT for unrelated tasks outside this domain.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Automated discovery and matching of agent skills for dynamic task routing and capability assessment
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apache Airflow DAGs, operators, SLA monitoring, and workflow orchestration. Activate on: Airflow, DAG, operator, sensor, scheduler, task dependency, SLA, backfill, XCom. NOT for: dbt transformations (use dbt-analytics-engineer), streaming pipelines (use streaming-pipeline-architect).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use jury_rig-architect), specific tool implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design a normalized, machine-readable "work receipt" that answers what changed, why, by whom, and with what validation, for any AI-coding-agent task regardless of backend (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Aider, CI, or homegrown). Use when defining a receipt schema, normalizing heterogeneous agent logs into one evidence shape, gating PR merges on artifact-backed proof, or designing an OSS maintainer's fast-reject/fast-merge workflow. NOT for validating a DAG node's output against its own schema (use output-contract-enforcer), continuous runtime monitoring of a live coordination daemon (use runtime-verification-for-agents), or general Port Daddy claims/notes/salvage mechanics (use port-daddy-agent-skill).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Choose the next useful step for evaluating a voice or chat agent with Coval. Use for getting started or deciding what to do next; use a specific skill directly when the task is already clear.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Delegate a read-only Coval evaluation, simulation, monitoring, product-how-to, or troubleshooting subtask to Sofia through the official Coval MCP consult_sofia tool. Use when the user needs Coval-specific FDE judgment, analysis of organization data, metric or test-set recommendations, or a diagnosis grounded in Coval runs and conversations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Operating guide for the durable Autonomous Work Loop task fleet. Use when adding work to, coordinating, or working an Autonomous Work Loop campaign, or when calling the work_loop MCP tool.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
The Platform List: Arman's own register of large platform-level work he chose not to start yet. Use when the reminder hook says a row is due, when Arman says to add, snooze, kill, or finish a row, when you own a row, or when you think something belongs there. NOT for ordinary tasks, defects, or handoffs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decision-ready scouting record for a user-connected provider access campaign. Use when an assigned Provider Access Launch task needs its easiest official route, minimum scopes, cost, account needs, approval path, implementation consumer, and easy-execute verdict established before submission. NOT for client Local Listings distribution.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
The cross-repo scheduling system (sch_* tables, matrx-scheduler). Use when touching features/scheduling/**, /schedules or /administration/scheduling, migrations/sch_*.sql, a scheduled agent, cron, trigger, lease, or claim, or debugging ghost tasks, missed fires, double-runs, or stuck claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Working playbook preloaded into the researcher helper; the coach updates its Lessons after each round. Use only when acting as researcher or coaching it. NOT for general research tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end execution of a scouted third-party provider access campaign. Use when a Provider Access Launch task is ready_to_submit or scouted easy_execute and needs account or app registration, scopes, reviewer assets, Vault credential custody, the canonical connection, and real verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-of-task routine: health checks, fixes, then commit and push. Use when finishing a unit of work, or when the user says 'commit and push', 'ship it', 'get it ready', 'wrap up', or just 'do this' with no push instruction.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.