'commitments' 검색 결과

Fast non-interactive briefing before any meeting — auto-detects your next calendar event, pulls relationship history, surfaces open commitments, and produces a one-page brief in under 30 seconds. Use this whenever the user says "brief me", "give me a quick brief", "what's coming up", "background on my next call", "who am I meeting next", "brief me on Sarah", "I have a call in 10 min", "quick rundown", or right before walking into a meeting. Different from /minutes-prep — brief is the fast hook-fireable version that doesn't ask questions and doesn't set goals. Use brief when speed matters; use prep when the user wants to think hard about goals first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Weekly meeting synthesis — themes, decision arcs, stale commitments, and what deserves your attention next week. Use when the user says "weekly review", "what happened this week", "weekly summary", "recap my week", "any outstanding items", "week in review", or at the end of a work week.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare for an industry analyst briefing (Gartner, Forrester, IDC and similar). Use when asked to prep an analyst briefing, write an AR briefing document, build talking points for an analyst call, or prepare a Magic Quadrant / Wave submission narrative. Produces a briefing kit — objective, company/product narrative, differentiation, proof points, the demo storyline, anticipated questions, and follow-up commitments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn meeting notes into an accountable register — extract decisions, actions and open questions, flag ownerless items, track follow-through. Use when commitments get dropped or a recurring meeting decides nothing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Takes meeting transcripts, extracts action items with owners and deadlines, detects implicit commitments, generates structured meeting summaries, and outputs task files compatible with Linear, GitHub Issues, and other project management tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a 13-week rolling cash flow forecast from bank exports, AR aging, AP bills, payroll, and recurring commitments -- the report that tells a small business whether it survives the quarter. Flags the crunch weeks early enough to act.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via acc_act(runtime="outcome").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan sprints with story point estimation, capacity planning, sprint goals, and retrospective frameworks. Organize teams for effective iteration with clear goals, realistic commitments, and continuous improvement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Simple task management using a shared TASKS.md file. Reference this when the user asks about their tasks, wants to add/complete tasks, or needs help tracking commitments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user is closing an ISO week, reviewing planned outcomes against evidence, interviewing work Areas, resolving unfinished commitments, or asking for "ретро", "weekly retro", "week review", or lessons from the week.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Condense rebuttal prose into fewer words without changing the original meaning. Use when a response block, paragraph, or selected passage is too long but all technical content, citations, and commitments must stay intact. Supports academic English.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Simple task management using a shared TASKS.md file. Reference this when the user asks about their tasks, wants to add/complete tasks, or needs help tracking commitments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Schools of historical thought, methodology debates, and the philosophy of history. Covers the major historiographical traditions (Annales, Marxist, feminist, postcolonial, subaltern, world-systems), their methodological commitments, their contributions and limitations, and the enduring debates about objectivity, narrative, and the nature of historical knowledge. Use when evaluating how different historians approach the same subject, understanding why historical interpretations change over time, or assessing the theoretical framework underlying a historical argument.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The **Commitment Tracker** skill extracts and makes explicit the **ontological commitments** that agents make implicitly through their code and behavior. It enables detection and resolution of silent incompatibilities between systems that use different underlying assumptions about what exists and ho

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert FinOps guidance for cloud, AI, and SaaS technology spend. Covers AI cost management, agentic FinOps, GenAI capacity planning, self-hosted vs managed inference, Anthropic billing, open-weight vendor APIs (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM), AWS (EC2, Bedrock, SageMaker, Savings Plans, CUR), Azure (reservations, AHB, OpenAI PTUs), GCP (Vertex AI, BigQuery), OCI, Kubernetes cost allocation, data platforms (Databricks, Fabric F-SKUs, Snowflake), tagging governance, SaaS management (SAM, shadow IT), AI coding tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Codex), ITAM, allocation, showback, chargeback, anomaly management, KPIs and benchmarking, waste detection playbooks, workload onboarding and M&A, and GreenOps (cloud carbon, CSRD). Use for any question about technology cost or waste in your estate - expiring commitments or RIs, NAT gateway bills, idle VMs, snapshot sprawl - and for commitment sizing, rightsizing, allocation, SaaS sprawl, AI dev tool spend, or connecting spend to business value. Built by OptimNow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structures bridge financing with commitment terms, flex provisions, and permanent takeout analysis for acquisition financing. Use when arranging bridge facilities, analyzing flex economics, or managing bridge-to-bond transitions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates cornerstone investment commitments with allocation guarantees, lock-up terms, and signaling value assessment. Use when structuring cornerstone tranches, analyzing anchor investors, or evaluating demand signals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Thoroughness and diligence in execution — systematic checking, completeness verification, follow-through on commitments, and the discipline of finishing well. Maps the personality trait of conscientiousness to AI task execution: not cutting corners, verifying results, and ensuring that what was promised is what was delivered. Use before marking a task as complete, when a response feels "good enough" but deserves better, after a complex multi-step operation where steps may have drifted, or when self-monitoring detects a pattern of cutting corners or rushing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reflective Memory. Use when working with memory, reflection, context management, or intent tracking. Provides the reflective memory practice — how and when to use keep tools for capturing insights, tracking commitments, and maintaining awareness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare customer or executive business reviews with outcome tracking, adoption health, ROI narrative, risks, commitments, and next-quarter plan using customer success and CX frameworks. Use when teams need QBRs, success plans, churn-risk conversations, or executive account reviews. Do not use for generic slide beautification or cold outreach prospecting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess team health using Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team model. Use when a leader says "my team feels off", "we have trust issues", "people aren't speaking up in meetings", "accountability is a problem", "we keep missing commitments", "the team is siloed", "we're not working well together", or "I want to do a team health check". Also trigger when someone describes symptoms like passive agreement in meetings, blame culture, missed deadlines without escalation, or people optimizing for their own metrics over team goals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.