115건 · 관련도순
Comprehensive research corpus covering 40+ agentic coordination protocols and ecosystems (MCP, A2A, ANP, UCP, ACP, AGNTCY, NANDA, FIPA, WoT, etc.) with emphasis on identity architectures, governance bodies, and interoperability convergence patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Monitors private credit market evolution with AUM growth, competitive dynamics, and spread convergence with broadly syndicated markets. Use when analyzing private credit trends, tracking market evolution, or assessing competitive positioning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply ant colony optimization and foraging theory to resource search, exploration-exploitation tradeoffs, and distributed discovery. Covers scout deployment, trail reinforcement, diminishing returns detection, and adaptive foraging strategy selection. Use when searching a large solution space where brute-force enumeration is impractical, balancing investment between exploring new approaches and deepening known good ones, optimizing resource allocation across uncertain opportunities, or diagnosing premature convergence on local optima.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run an authorized task inside an Available Work Time (AWT) window with a shorter Closeout Grace Period (CGP), fixed deadlines, forecast checks, proportional convergence points, and a hard stop. Use when the user explicitly requests timeboxing, supplies an AWT/CGP pair, says AWT or CGP, or an applicable project policy requires the protocol. Do not invent durations or activate timeboxing merely because a task may take time.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply the Minimum Sufficient Language (MSL) principle through the MSL Kernel to write anything a reader must act on. Bind the reader and what they already know, partition facts from the machinery that produced them, emit each admitted fact as an action, a verification, a judgment, or a state, and stop when every claim is checkable and the reader can act. Use for status updates, work-in-progress reports to your own user, closeout and convergence comments, tickets, pull request and review write-ups, incident and postmortem notes, emails, memos, and any draft for readers outside the work. Also use when the user says MSL, Minimum Sufficient Language, write this for stakeholders, drop the jargon, make this readable, or asks for a paste-ready draft.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Optimize ChatGPT Voice in the Codex desktop app into an ear-first control plane for free-form task coordination and opt-in workflows. Apply spoken synthesis, routing-only coordination, owning-task role contracts, project placement, explicit authority, safe speech, current-state verification, honest recovery, and the optional Slopware Dev Stack: MSL, MSW, CODER Loop, and Timebox. Load named workflows only when invoked: Freeway for parallel lanes, Decision Walkthrough for read-only authority convergence, and Tutorial for teaching-first onboarding. Use when the user invokes the voice optimizer, coordinates Codex work through voice, assigns the current voice task as coordinator, runs Freeway, starts a decision walkthrough, learns voice orchestration, routes development through CODER, authorizes Timebox, or asks CVO to install or use Slopware companions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run Phase 5 (formal hardening) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-verifier to execute proof obligations, security hardening, and a purity-boundary audit before convergence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when evaluating VCSDD grading dimensions during adversarial review. Provides concrete evaluation checklists for each of the 5 dimensions and convergence signal detection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Redistricting analysis in R using the redistverse ecosystem. Use whenever the user is working with redist, redistmetrics, ggredist, geomander, adj, alarmdata, PL94171, censable, easycensus, tinytiger, baf, rict, or redistio. Covers the complete pipeline: Census and spatial data loading, adjacency graph construction, SMC/MCMC simulation, constraints (population balance, county splits, VRA compliance), convergence diagnostics, plan metrics (compactness, partisan fairness, splits), visualization, summary tables, and interactive plan drawing. Invoke whenever the user mentions redistricting, gerrymandering, district plans, simulation ensembles, or any redistverse package by name.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Density functional theory calculations end to end — structure relaxation, convergence, band structures, and defect energetics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
General workflow for auditing ML CI failures, experiment regressions, training run failures, golden metric failures, and telemetry-backed ML work-product claims from local repositories, logs, metrics, configs, and artifacts. Use when Codex needs to decide whether an ML failure is a model/convergence issue, correctness bug, data/config issue, infrastructure/runtime issue, evaluation/gating policy issue, or unsupported claim, and produce structured evidence-backed outputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this whenever the user asks to "open a PR", "ship this", "create the pull request", "make a PR", or once a Vue feature/fix is verified and ready to push. Full lifecycle: branch → commit (commitizen) → issue → draft PR → CI → ready → autonomous monitor loop (fix comments, resolve threads, iterate until CI green + zero unresolved threads). `--perfect` adds a CodeRabbit convergence loop on top. Never works on `main`/`master`, never uses `--no-verify`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Ideate a brand-new game concept with the user, from a blank page or a one-line hint to a finished CONCEPT card. Use it whenever the user wants to come up with a new game — whether the project has no design document yet, or already has one and they're exploring a fresh idea. Through a structured divergence/convergence dialogue it explores ideas, frames the hook, generates and scores concepts (market validation delegated to /unikit-gd-explore), and settles pillars, loops, motivation, and a pre-mortem. Trigger whenever the user wants to make or invent a game, doesn't know where to start, or gives a genre/theme hint, e.g. "let's come up with a game", "I don't know what game to make", "I want to make a roguelike", "a game about zombies", "a farming game", "help me come up with a concept". For researching or dissecting existing games use /unikit-gd-explore; to write an already-chosen concept as the master GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Aggregate friction log files across a time period to identify recurring patterns, classify each cluster by intervention type, produce a prioritized action plan with success criteria, and calculate convergence metrics. Complements `skmtc-retro` (which captures per-session signal) by acting as the system's actuator: turning accumulated observations into decisions. The primary output is a review document that makes the "is it getting better?" question answerable. Use this skill when the user asks to "review retros", "review friction", "run a retro review", "what's the pattern across sessions", "what should we fix next", or on a periodic cadence (monthly, pre-release). Also run after a cluster of sessions on the same feature area to surface systemic issues before they compound. Distinct from `skmtc-retro` — that skill captures per-session observations; this skill synthesizes them into decisions. Do not run this skill as a substitute for a per-session retro.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Autonomous comprehensive refactoring. Three-phase pipeline — Phase 1 /refactor (tactical, loops internally to convergence) → Phase 2 loop of /review-arch + /implement-batch until architectural findings converge below a severity floor (default HIGH+) → Phase 3 /refactor (catches tactical issues introduced by restructuring). Auto-approves /review-arch ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, breaking-change proposals, repeated implementation failure, or Phase-2 hard-cap exhaustion (5 architectural iterations).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Estimates time-scaled phylogenies, molecular-clock rates, effective reproduction number R_e, and population dynamics from dated pathogen genomes using TreeTime (maximum-likelihood) and BEAST2 (Bayesian; strict/relaxed clocks; coalescent, Bayesian-Skyline, Skygrid, Birth-Death-Skyline, and sampled-ancestor priors; structured coalescent via MASCOT). Covers root-to-tip clock QC via TempEst, date-randomisation tests, recombination masking via Gubbins/ClonalFrameML before clock inference for recombining bacteria, BDSKY origin-vs-rootHeight pitfalls, sampling-bias correction, multi-chain convergence diagnostics, and reconciling phylodynamic R_e with case-based R_t. Use when dating outbreak origins, estimating substitution rates, inferring R_e through time, building time-calibrated Nextstrain Augur trees, choosing between strict and relaxed clocks, fitting Birth-Death-Skyline models, diagnosing temporal-signal failure, running MASCOT for structured-population analyses, or using UShER for pandemic-scale placement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships. Use when output must clear two independent adversarial reviewers before it ships.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze, design, write, revise, translate, and review empirical or technical research papers through an evidence-bounded dialectical workflow. Use when Codex must develop a research question, integrate reference papers with a user's ideas, build phenomenon-mechanism-conditions reasoning, design methods or experiments, restructure or edit a manuscript, translate Chinese academic text into restrained English, answer reviewers, or run multi-round peer-review convergence without fabricating evidence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
コードベースの規模に応じた目標値計算、倍増エスカレーション、領域追跡、最終検証を備えた体系的なバグスウィープ。/bugsweep 実行時や体系的なバグ調査が要求された場合に使用します。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
系统化 Bug 扫荡工作流，包含基于代码库规模的目标值计算、翻倍升级机制、区域追踪及最终验证。适用于执行 /bugsweep 或用户要求进行系统化 Bug 排查时。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.