275건 · 관련도순
Provides miscellaneous CTF challenge techniques for problems that do not cleanly fit the main categories. Use for encoding puzzles, pyjails, bash jails, RF/SDR, DNS oddities, unicode tricks, esoteric languages, QR or audio puzzles, constraint solving, game theory, unusual sandbox
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides AI and machine learning techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking ML models, crafting adversarial examples, performing model extraction, prompt injection, membership inference, training data poisoning, fine-tuning manipulation, neural network analysis, LoRA adapt
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Siber Vatan CTF playbook — flag formats, web/reverse/forensics/blockchain/OSINT/stego/crypto recipes, and pivot heuristics tailored to the Turkish CTF circuit.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides cryptography attack techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking encryption, hashing, signatures, ZKP, PRNG, or mathematical crypto problems involving RSA, AES, ECC, lattices, LWE, CVP, number theory, Coppersmith, Pollard, Wiener, padding oracle, GCM, key derivation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Aşamalı CTF ipucu sistemi — takılan kullanıcıya seviyeli ipucu verir. Level 1 (nudge), Level 2 (direction), Level 3 (solution). Her challenge için hint seviyesi ~/.fetih/ctf_hints.json'da takip edilir.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
사진, 영상, 공개 기록의 적은 단서를 연결해 장소, 일시, 조직 관계를 검증합니다. 근거와 가설을 구분하고 반증과 미확인 사항도 정리하는 조사 스킬입니다.
CTF杂项知识库 — Python Jail逃逸、Bash Jail逃逸、编码链识别与解码、QR/音频/图像隐写、游戏VM逆向、CTFd API导航、Linux提权
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Searches for similar CTF challenge writeups using Tavily API for search and content extraction. Use when the user requests finding related challenges, when solve-challenge has failed multiple times and needs reference solutions, or when first identifying a challenge type and seeking examples.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides digital forensics and signal analysis techniques for CTF challenges. Use when analyzing disk images, memory dumps, event logs, network captures, cryptocurrency transactions, steganography, PDF analysis, Windows registry, Volatility, PCAP, Docker images, coredumps, side-channel power traces, DTMF audio spectrograms, packet timing analysis, CD audio disc images, or recovering deleted files and credentials.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Solves CTF challenges by performing first-pass triage, identifying the dominant category, and routing execution to the right specialized ctf-* skill. Use when the user gives you a challenge bundle, a remote service, a suspicious file, or only a vague challenge description and you must determine where to start. Do not use it when the category is already clear and a specialized skill can be invoked directly; this is the dispatcher and recon entrypoint, not the deepest reference for category-specific techniques.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides open source intelligence techniques for CTF challenges. Use when gathering information from public sources, social media, geolocation, DNS records, username enumeration, reverse image search, Google dorking, Wayback Machine, Tor relays, FEC filings, or identifying unknown data like hashes and coordinates.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser client, template engine, identity flow, or smart-contract frontend/backend surface, including XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, XXE, JWT, auth bypass, file upload, request smuggling, OAuth/OIDC, SAML, prototype pollution, and similar web bugs. Do not use it for native binary memory corruption, reverse engineering of standalone executables, disk or memory forensics, or pure cryptanalysis unless the web flaw is still the main path to the flag.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides binary exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when you already have a vulnerable native target or service and need to turn memory corruption or low-level primitives into code execution or privilege escalation, such as buffer overflows, format strings, heap bugs, ROP, ret2libc, shellcode, kernel exploitation, seccomp bypass, sandbox escape, or Windows/Linux exploit chains. Do not use it when the main blocker is understanding what the binary does; use reverse engineering first. Do not use it for pure web bugs, disk or packet forensics, or standalone crypto/math challenges.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides AI and machine learning techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking ML models, crafting adversarial examples, performing model extraction, prompt injection, membership inference, training data poisoning, fine-tuning manipulation, neural network analysis, LoRA adapter exploitation, LLM jailbreaking, or solving AI-related puzzles.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides cryptography attack techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking encryption, hashing, signatures, ZKP, PRNG, or mathematical crypto problems involving RSA, AES, ECC, lattices, LWE, CVP, number theory, Coppersmith, Pollard, Wiener, padding oracle, GCM, key derivation, or stream/block cipher weaknesses.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides miscellaneous CTF challenge techniques for problems that do not cleanly fit the main categories. Use for encoding puzzles, pyjails, bash jails, RF/SDR, DNS oddities, unicode tricks, esoteric languages, QR or audio puzzles, constraint solving, game theory, unusual sandbox escapes, and hybrid logic puzzles. Prefer a more specific skill first when the challenge is mainly web, pwn, reverse, forensics, malware, OSINT, or crypto. Treat this as the fallback skill for genuine cross-category or edge-case challenges, not the default starting point.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides malware analysis and network traffic techniques for CTF challenges. Use when analyzing obfuscated scripts, malicious packages, custom crypto protocols, C2 traffic, PE/.NET binaries, RC4/AES encrypted communications, YARA rules, shellcode analysis, memory forensics for malware (Volatility malfind, process injection detection), anti-analysis techniques (VM/sandbox detection, timing evasion, API hashing, process injection, environment checks), or extracting malware configurations and indicators of compromise.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for enterprise mail abuse, OAuth consent, inbox or forwarding rules, transport rules, shared mailbox access, phishing chains, and token-to-mailbox side effects. Use when the user asks to trace mailbox rules, OAuth consent grants, forwarding or delegate abuse, shared mailbox access, message-trace evidence, or explain how mail artifacts turn into persistence, exfiltration, or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for malware configuration recovery, staged payload boundaries, beacon parameter extraction, and IOC decoding. Use when the user asks to recover a malware config, decode C2 or beacon fields, unpack staged payloads, extract bot or campaign IDs, or tie recovered config to observed protocol behavior under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, OAuth, enterprise messaging, Windows host forensics, credential material, and lateral-movement challenges. Use when the user asks to trace tickets or tokens, inspect mailbox rules, analyze Windows host evidence, understand an AD trust path, or explain a lateral-movement chain across sandbox-linked nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for OAuth, OIDC, redirect flows, state or nonce handling, PKCE, token exchange, refresh logic, claim mapping, and accepted login paths. Use when the user asks to trace redirects, callback parameters, scopes, state, nonce, PKCE, refresh tokens, consent, or explain how an OAuth or OIDC chain turns into accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for GraphQL schemas, persisted queries, RPC manifests, generated clients, OpenAPI drift, hidden operations, and contract-to-handler mismatches. Use when the user asks to inspect GraphQL or RPC requests, compare client contracts to live handlers, recover hidden operations, trace generated clients, or explain how schema or contract drift produces the decisive behavior. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kubernetes API analysis, service-account trust, RBAC edges, admission and controller behavior, cluster secrets, workload mutation, and namespace-scoped drift. Use when the user asks to inspect kube API permissions, service-account tokens, RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding edges, admission webhooks, controller-created pods, secret exposure, or why live workloads differ from manifests. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.