140건 · 관련도순
Professional deep research report generation — multi-agent collaboration with parallel chapter writing, automatic latest-data targeting, multilingual output, and built-in quality checks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when performing web research beyond a simple single search -- looking into topics, comparing options, investigating questions, finding recommendations, or any task where effective use of Exa, Firecrawl, and Reddit tools matters. Triggers on "research", "look into", "investigate", "compare", "find out about", "search for", "find information", "what do people think about", "what are the best", "look up", or multi-source search tasks. Also invocable explicitly by deep-research team members via the Skill tool.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct comprehensive deep research on any topic using Dify-powered workflow - searches documentation, academic papers, tutorials, APIs, best practices, and returns structured analysis with insights.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Use for: market analysis, competitive landscaping, literature reviews, technical research, due diligence. Takes 2-10 minutes but produces detailed, cited reports. Costs $2-5 per task.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Operate Tongyi DeepResearch and its WebAgent family: ReAct inference setup, rollout validation, benchmark evaluation, and variant routing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Operate the Deep Researcher Agent repository for autonomous deep-learning experiments, execution backends, provider/tool dispatch, GPU resources, durable progress, and research-support integrations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct deep web research using the openbrowser-ai agent: decompose a query, investigate sub-questions across multiple sources, and produce a cited markdown report plus structured JSON under local_docs/research/. Trigger when the user asks to: research a topic, do a deep dive, investigate, gather evidence, compare options, write a literature review, build a briefing, or produce a cited report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Use for: market analysis, competitive landscaping, literature reviews, technical research, due diligence. Takes 2-10 minutes but produces detailed, cited reports. Costs $2-5 per task.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic multi-angle web research methodology.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-round deep research on any GitHub repo via API.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
用 Codex CLI 子任务完成多来源深度调研并综合成带出处的报告。用于确实需要分头取证的研究，不用于单次查证或已给定材料的总结。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provider-neutral deep-research orchestration for brainstorming, technology choices, comparisons, and state-of-the-art surveys. The Research Lead makes scope and decision calls while native subagents scout, search, verify, synthesize, audit, write, and commit every research artifact.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct in-depth, multi-step research on a given topic by decomposing queries, finding diverse sources, cross-referencing findings, and synthesizing a comprehensive report. Use when the user requests deep research or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Advanced web search, content extraction, and site mapping through Tavily via SandBase. Use when asked for web research, URL content extraction, full article reading, news search, or site structure discovery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research with scoped depth and counterevidence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert guide for autonomous deep research, iterative web search, citation verification, evidence graph synthesis, and hallucination mitigation / Panduan ahli riset mendalam otonom, pencarian web iteratif, verifikasi sitasi, dan mitigasi halusinasi.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run deep research on a topic. Web searches, data collection, source checking, and a structured report. Use when the user needs more than a quick answer.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user's prompt requires (1) researching a topic across multiple sources, comparing options or alternatives, analyzing trends or history, understanding markets or industries, or reviewing literature or studies and (2) synthesizing that research into a comprehensive, narrative report. If you're planning to search the web or internal knowledge bases, consider using this skill. This skill coordinates research subagents, so use it only when you have a tool for spawning subagents (the Agent or Task tool); otherwise, research the question directly.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.