455건 · 관련도순
Plan interviews and focus groups for qualitative research, which explores people’s experiences and views. Develop question guides, follow-up prompts, discussion plans, transcription conventions, and participant review procedures suited to the study.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Draft or revise introductions for economics papers using a clear sequence: motivation, research question, empirical approach, findings, and contribution to existing literature. A checklist helps identify vague claims, missing results, misplaced literature discussion, and excessive length.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Develop scientific manuscripts from literature-backed outlines into connected paragraphs. Organize introductions, methods, results, and discussions; integrate citations and figures; and adapt the manuscript to study reporting guidelines and the target journal’s requirements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assess one selected pull request using its full discussion, reviews, and linked issues. Produce an advisory recommendation about its next step, with optional comments and labels, without reviewing the code diff or approving a merge.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find user-generated content about a brand or account, including fan posts, reviews, and community discussions. Get a source-linked report that highlights posts worth engaging with, separates negative feedback, and suggests responses.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build research and technical reports with clear summaries, reproducible methods, results, and discussion. Connect conclusions to supporting figures or calculations, apply consistent figure standards, and prepare Markdown, HTML, or PDF deliverables.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates structured biomedical outlines for review articles, discussion sections, and thesis proposals. Use when a user provides biomedical keywords, results/discussion text, or a proposal title plus background and needs a directly usable academic writing scaffold.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end user research assistant — qualitative and quantitative. Use this skill whenever the user mentions user research, user interviews, discussion guides, interview guides, research plans, qualitative research, quantitative research, user surveys, survey design, usability studies, participant recruitment, research synthesis, interview transcripts, research reports, running studies with AI, or explicitly mentions Cookiy AI. Also trigger when users want to talk to customers, conduct discovery research, create a study or survey, analyze interview data, run AI-moderated interviews, or collect survey responses. Covers the full lifecycle: planning studies, creating discussion guides, running AI-moderated interviews (real or synthetic) via Cookiy, designing and distributing surveys, and synthesizing results into reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when drafting AISTATS author responses or author-reviewer discussion replies under OpenReview, covering text-only discussion, no-link guidance, no revised-paper upload, anonymity requirements, statistician-reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused clarification strategy for theory-plus-experiments papers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Handle SLEAP GitHub support workflow for issues and discussions. Use when the user says "support", provides a GitHub issue/discussion number like "#2512", or asks to investigate a user report from talmolab/sleap. Scaffolds investigation folders, downloads posts with images, analyzes problems, and drafts friendly responses.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze Reddit threads for sentiment, consensus opinions, top arguments, and discussion patterns. Use this when users want to understand Reddit community opinions, analyze discussions, or gather insights from subreddit conversations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Fill a Stage5 final remarks template using condensed discussion markdown from all reviewers and optional rating changes. Use when generating final remarks after Stage3/Stage4 discussion.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Search discussions, track communities, analyze posts, and discover trends on Reddit through SandBase. Use when asked for Reddit research, community analysis, trending topics, discussion monitoring, content discovery, or audience insight beyond customer-focused research.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Hoyeon Socratic discussion workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-discuss", "/discuss", asks to think through an idea, challenge assumptions, clarify requirements before planning, run a deep/scored discussion, or says Korean phrases like "같이 생각해보자", "문제 정의", "이거 어떻게 생각해?", "요구사항이 불명확", or "아이디어 구체화".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured meeting summaries with action items, decisions, and key discussion points. Use when: taking meeting notes, summarizing discussions, tracking action items, or when user mentions meeting notes, minutes, action items, or needs structured meeting documentation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Web search, online retrieval, real-time information query, search engine search, Reddit and other community platform discussions, external site posts and trending topics. Trigger when users need to search for the latest information online, look up recent news or trends, query real-time data, research topics via search engines, browse Reddit or community discussions, discover external site posts and trending topics, obtain any online content, web search, online lookup, real-time information, news search, Reddit, trending topics, search engine. Even if the user does not explicitly say "search", trigger this skill whenever their intent involves obtaining real-time web information or verifying current facts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Fetch the latest AI/ML news, trending open-source projects, social media discussions, and KOL (Key Opinion Leader) perspectives from 370+ curated sources. Use when the user asks about recent AI news, AI trends, what's happening in machine learning, open-source AI projects, AI Twitter/Reddit discussions, or wants a daily AI briefing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Monitor social platforms for security threats, vulnerability discussions, and breach intelligence using Xpoz. Use when asked to "find CVE discussions", "security threat monitoring", "OSINT social media", "vulnerability intelligence", "breach mentions", or "threat intel from Twitter/Reddit".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Checks the canonical upstream issue tracker, discussion forums, and open pull requests, merge requests, or equivalent change queues for existing reports, discussion, or work on a problem just discussed. Use before diagnosing, fixing, or reporting an apparent open-source problem to avoid duplicate effort and missed context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-agent collaboration session. Brings 2-4 agent perspectives into one discussion for architecture decisions and trade-off analysis. Use when asked "should we X or Y?", "let's discuss", or "design review".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.