'quality' 검색 결과

Diagnostic-only test suite auditor. Classifies repo type, maps against 7-layer testing taxonomy (git hooks → static → unit → integration → system → E2E → acceptance), runs deterministic quality gates (coverage, mutation, CRAP, architecture, escape-scan), builds RTM / personas / journeys traceability, produces TEST_AUDIT.md, updates tests/TESTING.md, and mandatorily hands off to implement-tests when gaps are found. Use when auditing test quality, finding test gaps, or running the full 7-layer sweep. Trigger with "audit tests", "find gaps", "test audit", "check test quality", "full sweep", "7-layer audit", "rtm check".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a local or remote tabular file (CSV/TSV) for common data quality issues — schema, nulls, types, duplicates. Read-only. Use when a dataset needs a quality check before publishing, or a showcase renders wrong (blank cells, garbled numbers, an unsortable date column) and the cause needs isolating.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when comparing two videos to analyze compression results or quality differences. Generates interactive HTML reports with quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) and frame-by-frame visual comparisons. Triggers when users mention "compare videos", "video quality", "compression analysis", "before/after compression", or request quality assessment of compressed videos.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Check live air quality anywhere with zero API keys — Open-Meteo's air-quality API via curl, decoded from raw PM2.5 and AQI numbers into what they mean for going outside. Use when asked what's the air quality, is it safe to run outside, AQI in my city, or pollution levels right now. Produces the current AQI and pollutant levels, the plain-language health read with the standard bands, and the rerunnable command.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Collect and assess quality metrics for Simulink models using the metric.Engine API. Use when evaluating model design quality (maintainability, complexity, architecture) or testing completeness (unit testing, SIL, PIL, coverage, pass rates) after edits or test runs. Covers metric discovery, collection, report generation, and diagnostics. Triggers on: "collect metrics", "quality metrics", "metric.Engine", "testing metrics", "maintainability metrics", "SIL metrics", "PIL metrics", "what metrics are available", "assess quality", "coverage metrics", "generate metric report", "diagnose metric errors".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read BEFORE troubleshooting or enhancing camera image quality. Diagnoses and enhances image quality from cameras connected via Image Acquisition Toolbox or USB Webcams support package. Discovers camera capabilities at runtime, analyzes captured images for quality issues (brightness, contrast, sharpness, noise, color balance, backlighting), suggests hardware setting adjustments tailored to the specific camera, and applies Image Processing Toolbox enhancement functions. Use when a user wants to improve camera image quality, troubleshoot dark/blurry/noisy/grainy/ overexposed/washed out/color cast images, or optimize camera settings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code and product quality gates for shipping with confidence. Runs code review, QA testing, performance checks, and security audits. Use when the user says 'review my code', 'is this ready to ship', 'check quality', 'run QA', 'test this', 'security check', 'pre-launch review', or wants a quality assessment before deploying.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Set up or refine open-source .NET code-quality gates for CI: formatting, `.editorconfig`, SDK analyzers, third-party analyzers, coverage, mutation testing, architecture tests, and security scanning. USE FOR: .NET quality gates in CI; analyzer, coverage, mutation, and architecture-test choices; standardizing `.editorconfig`, `dotnet format`, and warning policy. DO NOT USE FOR: non-.NET repositories; generic CI/CD guidance with no .NET quality stack decisions. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize candidate quality attributes for a problem, before any ADR or design work starts. Part of Plinth Toolkit

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provides comprehensive memory file management capabilities including auditing, quality assessment, and targeted improvements for files such as CLAUDE.md. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, fix, maintain, or validate project memory files. Also triggers for "project memory optimization", "CLAUDE.md quality check", "documentation review", or when a project memory file needs to be created from scratch. This skill scans memory files, evaluates quality against standardized criteria, outputs detailed quality reports with scores and recommendations, then makes targeted updates with user approval.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrates the QUALITY pipeline stage for egregore work items, running code review, unbloat, and test updates. Use when running quality checks before a PR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when comparing two videos to analyze compression results or quality differences. Generates interactive HTML reports with quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) and frame-by-frame visual comparisons. Triggers when users mention "compare videos", "video quality", "compression analysis", "before/after compression", or request quality assessment of compressed videos.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct comprehensive code reviews identifying bugs, security issues, performance problems, code quality concerns, and best practice violations. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, evaluating new code, assessing code quality, or providing feedback on implementations. Analyzes code for correctness, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, maintainability issues, test coverage, documentation quality, and adherence to coding standards. Produces structured markdown reviews with categorized findings, severity ratings, specific examples, and actionable recommendations. Triggers when users ask to review code, check pull requests, evaluate implementations, find bugs, or assess code quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply test quality principles when generating or reviewing test code. Enforces Arrange-Act-Assert structure, one behavior per test, assertion quality, test isolation, meaningful naming, and test data management. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, or when the user mentions 'write tests', 'test this', 'test quality', 'test review', 'improve tests', or 'test structure'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the craft of writing individual test cases -- not what to test (that is driven by the code being implemented) but how to write tests that are reliable, readable, and maintainable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The systematic orchestration of AI-powered marketing workflows that combine content generation, approval processes, multi-channel distribution, and quality gates into cohesive automation systems. This skill integrates AI generation tools (Jasper, Claude, GPT) with automation platforms (Zapier, Make, n8n) and marketing systems to build scalable content pipelines. It focuses on maintaining brand consistency, implementing rigorous quality gates, and balancing automation with strategic human oversight. Key capabilities include designing parallel approval flows, monitoring costs, and architecting "invisible" automation that enhances productivity without sacrificing quality.Use when "AI workflow, automate content, content automation, workflow automation, AI pipeline, automated marketing, content distribution automation, approval workflow, scale content production, AI orchestration, automation, workflow, ai-orchestration, content-pipeline, approval-workflow, multi-channel, quality-gates, cost-control" mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.