1.7천건 · 관련도순
Select the right formative assessment technique for a specific learning moment, purpose, and age group. Use when choosing how to check understanding during, between, or after lessons.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Risk-based vendor assessment framework for IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners under DORA, NIS2, GDPR. Provides three-phase process (Initial Screening / Detailed Assessment / Final Evaluation), six-dimension risk scoring (Financial/Operational/Compliance/Security/Reputational/Strategic) with weighted matrices, full DORA Art. 28-30 contractual checklist, NIS2 Art. 21(2) security measures enumeration, GDPR Art. 28 documentation checks, red flags per dimension, trigger-based review criteria, and document templates. Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting critical ICT third-party due diligence under DORA, (3) Performing supply chain security assessment under NIS2, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring, (6) Assessing concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive vendor risk reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
GDPR Transfer Impact Assessment for Chapter V transfers under the EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology, the CNIL TIA Guide (January 2025), and EDPB essential guarantees. Handles transfer qualification, Art. 45 adequacy fast-tracks, Art. 46 full assessments with country profiles for 12 jurisdictions, and balanced Art. 49 derogation analysis. Outputs a Markdown report, a .docx formal TIA, and a JSON delta for RoPA interchange.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers hidden behind reveal blocks, scenario-based legal memo tasks, strategy and function-building questions, and a pre-submission checklist that encodes the marking criteria. Use when the user needs to (1) assess a legal candidate with a realistic timed exercise, (2) train or onboard junior lawyers using problem sets rather than doctrine, (3) help a candidate prepare for a real take-home assessment they are facing, (4) build educational materials for law students, in-house teams, or compliance training, or (5) produce scenario-based training modules on specific legal topics. Triggers on "legal test", "take-home", "mock exam", "contract redline exercise", "candidate assessment", "legal training exercise", "practice test", or similar phrasing even when informal.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA cross-referencing under the amended Article 27(4), the unconditional notification duty under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate an AI Act report", "create a compliance assessment report", "document the AI Act analysis", "create a Prüfbericht", "export as Word document", or wants to consolidate prior AI Act skill outputs into a formal documented assessment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts retention impact assessments for new processing activities to determine appropriate data retention periods. Covers regulatory requirements scanning, proportionality review, purpose-based retention determination, and retention period documentation aligned with GDPR Article 5(1)(e) and Article 25 data protection by design. Activate for retention assessment, new processing retention, retention period determination queries.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides privacy law change monitoring and impact assessment for multi-jurisdiction organisations. Covers regulatory tracking sources, change classification, impact scoring methodology, and implementation prioritisation. Keywords: law monitoring, regulatory tracking, change management, impact assessment, implementation priority.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides conducting privacy law gap analysis for market entry into new jurisdictions. Covers target jurisdiction assessment, existing compliance mapping, remediation effort estimation, and implementation timeline planning. Keywords: gap analysis, market entry, jurisdiction assessment, remediation planning, compliance mapping.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Links RoPA entries to Data Protection Impact Assessments and lawful basis assessments. Covers cross-reference systems, dependency tracking, and update cascade triggers between RoPA, DPIA register, and lawful basis documentation. Activate for RoPA-DPIA link, cross-reference, dependency tracking, impact assessment linkage, cascade updates.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts HIPAA risk analysis per 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1) following OCR guidance methodology. Covers threat identification, vulnerability assessment, likelihood and impact determination, risk scoring, and mitigation planning for electronic protected health information. Keywords: HIPAA risk analysis, OCR guidance, threat assessment, vulnerability, risk management, ePHI.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts a Data Protection Impact Assessment for automated decision-making and profiling systems under GDPR Article 35(3)(a), covering algorithmic transparency, meaningful human oversight, contestation mechanisms, and Art. 22 safeguards. Activate for DPIA automated decision, profiling DPIA, algorithmic impact assessment, Art. 35(3)(a), ADM risk assessment queries.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides compliance with China's Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL, effective 1 November 2021). Covers consent requirements, cross-border transfer mechanisms (CAC security assessment, standard contracts, certification), separate consent triggers, and critical information infrastructure obligations. Keywords: PIPL, China data protection, CAC security assessment, cross-border transfer, separate consent, CIIO.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cloud service provider privacy assessment framework. Covers ISO 27018 cloud privacy controls, CSA STAR certification, SOC 2 Type II evaluation, shared responsibility model mapping, data residency verification, and cloud-specific privacy risk analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Think and work like an expert Life-Cycle Assessment Analyst. Use when a task calls for Life-Cycle Assessment Analyst judgment. Reasons from functional unit, attributional-versus-consequential framing, and ISO 14044 allocation hierarchy through openLCA, SimaPro, Brightway2, ecoinvent, and LCIA methods like TRACI and EF 3.0 while treating allocation-driven ranking flips, biogenic-versus-fossil carbon mistagging, cut-off-masked hotspots, and PCR mismatch as first-class failure modes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create or review legal risk assessment deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for legal risk assessment planning or analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when an instructor asks for a MATLAB Grader assessment setup guide, adoption guide, pilot plan, course-specific rollout, QTI 3 sharing workflow, or recommended MATLAB Grader assessment-item-generation configuration based on a learning objective, course title, course description, module description, lab description, or assessment goal.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate MATLAB Grader assessment items that are suitability-gated, profile-driven, feedback-aware, and validated through MATLAB MCP. Produces Script, Function, Class Definition, Class Inheritance, Object Usage, and Class Methods items with MATLAB Grader assessment setup instructions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classify curriculum content into Know, Understand, and Do categories to align teaching and assessment approaches. Use when planning units, writing objectives, or selecting assessment methods.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Select the right formative assessment technique for a specific learning moment, purpose, and age group. Use when choosing how to check understanding during, between, or after lessons.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design multi-informant assessment approaches for dispositional competencies like curiosity or resilience. Use when assessing character strengths or competencies that written tests cannot capture.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIA) for high-risk AI systems as required by EU AI Act Article 27. Use when (1) deployers of high-risk AI systems (Annex III) need to assess fundamental rights impacts before first use, (2) public bodies or private entities providing public services are deploying AI systems, (3) credit scoring or insurance risk assessment AI systems are being deployed (Annex III 5b, 5c), (4) evaluating impact on natural persons' fundamental rights (dignity, liberty, privacy, data protection, non-discrimination, children's rights, etc.), or (5) creating EU AI Act Article 27 compliance documentation with market surveillance notification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.