2.4천건 · 관련도순
Use this skill when the user asks what information a Stripe Connect connected account must provide for verification, onboarding, KYC, or account requirements; when they need to compare requirements between connected-account setups; or when they ask which verification fields, documents, or business details are required for a particular platform country, account country, business type, dashboard, service agreement, or capability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan structure validation, phase completeness checks, reference integrity verification, and artifact existence confirmation. Provides the structured verification layer ensuring GSD artifacts are well-formed and complete.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates explicit validation checkpoints (verification gates) between project phases to catch errors early and ensure quality before proceeding. Use when the user asks about quality gates, milestone checks, phase transitions, approval steps, go/no-go decision points, or preventing cascading errors across a multi-step workflow. Produces acceptance criteria checklists, automated CI gate configurations, manual sign-off requirements, and conditional review rules for scenarios such as security changes, API changes, or database migrations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detect insecure JWT (JSON Web Token) implementations in a codebase using a two-phase approach: first map all JWT issuance and verification sites to understand the token lifecycle and signing configuration, then check each verification site for exploitable weaknesses such as algorithm confusion, missing signature verification, weak secrets, header injection, and missing claim validation. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/jwt-results.md. If no JWT usage is found in Phase 1, Phase 2 is skipped. Use when asked to find JWT, token forgery, or authentication bypass bugs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user asks what information a Stripe Connect connected account must provide for verification, onboarding, KYC, or account requirements; when they need to compare requirements between connected-account setups; or when they ask which verification fields, documents, or business details are required for a particular platform country, account country, business type, dashboard, service agreement, or capability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verify claims, quotations, citations and references against live primary sources, and produce a reproducible audit record instead of an assertion. Use when asked to: check whether a quotation, verse, statistic, date, attribution or citation is accurate; verify references before publishing a report, thesis, article, slide deck or legal filing; confirm a text against an authoritative database; cross-check a claim across independent sources; build a citation register or verification appendix; find out whether two datasets agree; detect a misattributed or fabricated quotation; or audit a document's existing citations. Source-agnostic by design, with working providers for REST/JSON APIs, scraped HTML, bulk corpora, bibliographic catalogues (OpenLibrary), DOI resolution (Crossref) and reference works (Wikipedia) -- including scriptural tiers (Qur'an.com, sunnah.com and an independent hadith corpus) with full diacritic handling for Arabic, Hebrew, Greek and any script with optional marks. Covers content-addressed matching when sources disagree on numbering, graded match verdicts, byte-level integrity checks, published-string verification, and a catalogue of silent failure modes (identifier divergence, mojibake, scraper blocking, false-positive keyword rules, missing glyphs, unreliable PDF text layers).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Thorough verification of completed work before declaring done
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when verifying build/test/lint before commit, PR, or completion claims. Runs verification pipeline in fresh subagent context with auto-repair. Triggers on /handoff-verify, pre-commit check, build verification, test validation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute the next TaskMaster task using the implementation plan with CDD verification. Picks the next ready task, matches it to the plan step, implements via a dispatched subagent, verifies subtasks with evidence, marks the task done, and loops until every task is complete. Wraps the TaskMaster next -> in-progress -> done lifecycle with CDD GREEN / RED / BLUE verification and the plugin's triple-verification rule. Autonomous by design — no user prompts inside the loop.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Four-layer citation verification for academic papers. Scans LaTeX/BibTeX files, verifies every citation via WebSearch and Google Scholar, generates verification report with fix suggestions. Triggers on "verify citations", "check references", "citation verification", "prevent fake citations", "引用验证".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implements data lineage tracking for privacy compliance including origin tracking, transformation logging, access auditing, deletion verification, and cross-system lineage graphs. Covers source-to-sink mapping, GDPR Art. 30 RoPA integration, automated lineage discovery, and breach impact scoping. Keywords: data lineage, data provenance, data flow mapping, transformation logging, deletion verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides audit follow-up and verification processes including follow-up scheduling, remediation effectiveness testing, finding closure criteria, re-testing procedures, status reporting, and escalation of unremediated findings. Implements IIA Standard 2500 monitoring requirements and ISO 19011 follow-up guidance for privacy audit engagements. Keywords: audit follow-up, verification testing, finding closure, remediation effectiveness, re-testing, follow-up audit.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides audit findings remediation program management including finding prioritization by severity (critical, high, medium, low), owner assignment, remediation planning, deadline tracking, verification testing, closure criteria, escalation protocols, and management reporting. Covers remediation lifecycle from finding issuance to verified closure. Keywords: audit remediation, finding management, prioritization, verification testing, closure criteria, remediation tracking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Uses abstract interpretation to automatically infer loop invariants, function preconditions, and postconditions for formal verification. Generates invariants that capture program behavior and support correctness proofs in Dafny, Isabelle, Coq, and other verification systems. Use when adding formal specifications to code, generating verification conditions, inferring contracts for functions, or discovering loop invariants for proofs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and maintain GRACE 4 verification entries, commands, scenarios, markers, and assertion evidence under .grace/verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement consumer-driven contract testing with Pact-JS (v16). Covers consumer test writing, broker-driven provider verification, Pact Broker setup, can-i-deploy as a deployment gate, webhook-triggered verification, pending pacts, and schema-first vs consumer-first approaches (OpenAPI/Ajv, Schemathesis). Use when: "contract test," "Pact," "consumer-driven," "API contract," "provider verification," "can-i-deploy." Not for: stubbing or mocking a dependency to isolate a test — use service-virtualization; general REST/GraphQL endpoint assertions against your own API — use api-testing. Related: api-testing, service-virtualization, ci-cd-integration, test-environments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.