'summary' 검색 결과

Go back through the previous year of work and create a Notion doc that groups relevant links into projects that can then be documented as SRED projects.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill any time a .pptx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates, layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions "deck," "slides," "presentation," or references a .pptx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigates a single PostHog error tracking issue end-to-end. Use when the user provides an issue ID or pastes an issue URL (`/error_tracking/<id>`) and wants to understand the error — who it affects, what triggers it, when it started, whether it correlates with a release, browser, OS, or feature flag, and what the next step should be. Pulls aggregated metrics, sample exception events, segment breakdowns, linked replays, and synthesizes a hypothesis-grade summary in one pass.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Debug the signals pipeline locally end-to-end. Covers emitting test signals from fixtures, monitoring Temporal workflows via the REST API, reading sandbox agent logs from object storage, inspecting Docker sandbox containers, and diagnosing common failures (stale ClickHouse embeddings, agentsh network denials, inactivity timeouts). Use when a signal isn't reaching the inbox, a signal-report-summary workflow fails, or a sandbox task run times out.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse — find every broken or degraded pipeline item across sources, sync schemas, materialized views, batch exports, and transformations. Use when the user asks "what's broken in my warehouse?", "give me a health check", "audit my data pipeline", "why are some dashboards stale?", or wants a one-shot triage summary before deciding where to spend time. Produces a prioritized report of issues grouped by severity and type, with recommended next steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Synthesize scientific evidence into a claim-to-source matrix, distinguish primary evidence from interpretation, assess disagreement and study limitations, and produce a calibrated research summary.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build forest plots (HR, OR, RR, beta-coefficient summaries with CIs) and funnel plots (meta-analysis publication-bias diagnostics) using forestplot, metafor, ggforest, and MendelianRandomization with proper axis-scaling, summary-diamond placement, subgroup nesting, and Egger / trim-and-fill asymmetry tests. Use when summarizing effects across subgroups, trials, or instruments — meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization, subgroup HRs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end post-GWAS causal inference pipeline orchestrating heritability partitioning, genetic correlation, Mendelian randomization with CHP-aware sensitivity (CAUSE / LHC-MR), colocalization, fine-mapping with SuSiE / FOCUS, mediation, TWAS triangulation, cis-pQTL drug-target MR, effector-gene prioritization (L2G / PoPS / cS2G), and GenomicSEM common-factor GWAS. Use when triangulating causal inference across multiple complementary methods, prioritizing tissues via stratified LDSC, nominating or de-risking drug targets, mapping a lead SNP to a candidate effector gene, modeling shared genetic architecture across correlated traits, or producing a STROBE-MR-compliant publication-grade evidence battery from GWAS summary statistics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Promote QA → production by opening a PR from peterdrier/Humans:main to nobodies-collective/Humans:main with a properly-qualified commit summary. Use when the user says "PR to production", "promote to prod", "PR from origin to upstream", "prod PR", or any variation of pushing batched fork changes upstream. Always use this skill for the two-remote promotion flow even if the user doesn't say "prod" explicitly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract invoice data and generate a formatted PDF summary in a single pipeline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a professional PDF report with title, executive summary, data table, and footer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a multi-sheet XLSX workbook with quarterly revenue, expenses, and summary formulas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract traffic violation data from fine notices, then generate a spreadsheet summarizing all violations for fleet management.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract title, summary, steps, related links, and last updated date from a public help center article.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract headline, author, publication date, summary, category, and named entities from a public news article.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract clean title, summary, markdown sections, and source metadata from a public documentation page for RAG ingestion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Listens to a CARLA sensor and either saves its data to files, shows it live in a window, prints a one-shot summary, or (ros-info) reports the native ROS 2 topics, QoS and enabled-for-ROS state so you can echo it from ROS instead. Cameras save as PNG (depth/semantic auto-colourised) and display in a pygame window; lidar saves as .ply and shows as a top-down scatter; IMU/GNSS/radar/collision stream to JSONL or the console. Use when the user asks to "show/view the camera", "display the lidar", "save the sensor data / capture a dataset", or "what is this sensor reading". Select the sensor by id, type, or the actor it's attached to.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create a pull request from the current branch with structured summary

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create or update a pull request for the current branch. Trigger when the user asks to create/open/make a PR, or to edit/update/rewrite/fix the PR description, body, or summary — for both new PRs (`gh pr create`) and existing ones (`gh pr edit --body-file`). Use for any verb that lands on a PR's text content: "open a PR", "make a PR", "update the PR description", "rewrite the PR body", "fix the description".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assemble a Japanese shokumu-keirekisho (career history document) from an experience inventory, choosing between reverse-chronological, chronological, and skills-based layouts, mapping the target posting's requirements to the experiences that can support them, and drafting the summary, work history, skills, and self-PR so that each sentence stays within what its evidence supports and confidential details are abstracted. Use when a user wants to write or rebuild a whole shokumu-keirekisho for a specific posting or as a general version, or wants to decide which experiences to include and in what order; do not use to invent experience, numbers, titles, or qualifications, to predict whether it will pass screening, to fill in a rirekisho form, or to submit it anywhere.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Aligns and QCs methylated-RNA-immunoprecipitation (MeRIP / m6A-seq) IP and input libraries using STAR or HISAT2 splice-aware mapping, samtools sort/index, IP/input matched-pair tracking, antibody-lot metadata recording, replicate concordance via deepTools multiBamSummary + plotCorrelation, IP enrichment QC via plotFingerprint and per-transcript IP/input ratio distributions, library-complexity saturation curves via PreSeq c_curve / lc_extrap, and the explicit do-NOT-deduplicate convention for standard non-UMI MeRIP. Use when preparing paired IP and input BAM files for exomePeak2 / MeTPeak / MACS3 peak calling, evaluating MeRIP replicate concordance and IP enrichment, deciding whether to deduplicate (standard MeRIP typically NOT — see Tips), choosing genome-vs-transcriptome alignment for downstream peak vs m6Anet workflows, recording antibody clone and lot metadata for downstream cross-batch reconciliation, detecting failed IPs via saturation curves and IP/input distribution shape, or generating IP-over-Input bigWig tracks for downstream visualisation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.