'viewer' 검색 결과

Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when working with Bitbucket Pr Reviews — bitbucket pull request review management including default reviewers, merge checks, branch permissions, and build status integration. Use when configuring or automating Bitbucket PR review workflows across repositories and workspaces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Dispatch code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill for Hugging Face Dataset Viewer API workflows that fetch subset/split metadata, paginate rows, search text, apply filters, download parquet URLs, and read size or statistics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert en revue de code (PR reviews, patterns, anti-patterns, security, performance, readability)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ship the day's work in one repo: triage new issues, review every open PR (description, visual recap, adversarial reviewer, shipping pre-flight and quality gate), merge only after GO, then post a status recap. Use for "ship it", "ship day", "merge the ready PRs", "end of work block".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a PR or git range needs a visual recap page for a reviewer, with a changed-files tree, per-file notes, a Verified vs Not verified table, risks, and optional before/after images. Local and informational; never posts to GitHub.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when running the autonomous multi-agent build pipeline after /bdbrainstorm or /grill-me, when the user types /startcycle-graph or "run a startcycle", or when a task needs durable state, a review repair loop and an automated quality gate. Routes to the startcycle-dispatch Dynamic Workflow, which reads production_artifacts/state.json and invokes Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, and Shipping in turn per .agents/graph.md's edge table — the agents never invoke each other.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reference for how BDB structures autonomous software engineering work — the seven-node dispatcher graph (Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, Shipping) that /startcycle-graph actually runs. Use when you need the high-level lifecycle framing without inventing your own process.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review resumes, cover letters, application packages, and evidence maps from an HR perspective. Use when the user asks for 자기소개서 리뷰, 자소서 검토, HR 검토, 제출 전 점검, unsupported-claim detection, company-name residue checks, or risk-focused revision advice before applying.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Fan six specialist reviewers (general correctness, silent failures, type design, test gaps, comment accuracy, simplification) out over the current diff, a branch, or a PR in parallel, then merge their findings into one deduplicated, ranked report. Use for a thorough review before merging. Not for editing code or approving on someone's behalf.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Fresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide reviewers through systematic, constructive peer review of a pull request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use whenever SQL, ORM/jOOQ code, schema or migrations, indexes, N+1, or database load are in play, even without the word "review" — delegates the performance review of the current branch diff to the sql-performance-reviewer agent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use before finishing a change, or when asked to clean up, review for slop, drift, stale docs, or duplicated rules — runs the deterministic unslop lint and, for prose-level slop, delegates to the unslop-reviewer agent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use whenever the screens, UX, wording, feedback after actions, accessibility, or layout of frontend/ come up, even without the word "review" — delegates to the frontend-ux-reviewer agent, which runs the dev screens against the Lean CLI with Playwright and reports with evidence. Not for reviewing the domain model itself (that is the ddd skill's review).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use after a backend build succeeds or whenever authentication, authorization, actor/identity handling, external service calls (IdP, JWKS, DB, clock), logging, observability, configuration or error contracts are in play — delegates to the backend-design-reviewer agent for a design-quality review of the current branch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically consume open GitHub issues one by one. Fetches the oldest open issue, delegates implementation to the issue-implementer agent, runs code review via the code-reviewer agent, iterates on feedback, merges the PR, and moves on to the next issue. Invoke with `/auto-issue-worker`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-Entity Disclosure Tracker App-in-Skill — a Busabase review workspace that helps a compliance/IR team assemble and track a standardized disclosure package per financing vehicle (fund/SPV), across a generic onshore origination entity, an offshore fund-manager entity, and a listing/exchange venue. Use when the user invokes $kelly-disclosure-tracker or /kelly-disclosure-tracker, wants to review disclosure checklists, vehicle readiness, cross-entity reconciliation flags, or reviewer notes across multiple financing vehicles. Review workspace only — it never files anything or calls any external system.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.