본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills

'commitments' 검색 결과

109건 · 관련도순

Route agent work through AccInt's MCP memory loop: retrieve prior outcomes, resolve frames, and close commitments with evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

JantonioFC/skillsbank92026년 8월 4일 업데이트

Capture decisions and commitments after a meeting and draft a concise follow-up.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Pull fresh call recordings and transcripts from Fireflies.ai into an Obsidian vault over the official GraphQL API, then distill action items and commitments and reindex. Incremental and idempotent by transcript id. Triggers: "/fireflies-sync", "pull fireflies", "sync call recordings".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit92026년 10월 16일 업데이트

Cross-reference project artifacts (WBS, meeting minutes, requirements docs) by date, participant, and action items. Extract commitments from meeting minutes and link to WBS tasks. Generate traceability reports showing which decisions were captured in which documents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

takusaotome/claude-skills-library92026년 10월 5일 업데이트

nasa-risk

무료

Knowledge base from NASA Risk Management Handbook (NASA/SP-2011-3422). Use for risk-informed decision making, continuous risk management, performance commitments, risk scenario diagrams, risk disposition types, risk burn-down schedules, objectives hierarchies, deliberation and alternative selection, risk driver identification, and RM planning for space and safety-critical programmes. Does not cover domain-specific PRA methods (fault trees, event trees) in procedural depth — see NASA PRA Procedures Guide for those.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Drafts an account plan from the CRM notes, emails, meeting notes and contracts the user provides: situation, stakeholder map, opportunities as recorded, risks, open commitments and proposed next actions, every line traced to a source and gaps marked UNKNOWN. Returns a DRAFT Markdown document in the chat. Use when the user asks to "build an account plan", "refresh the key account plan", "what do we know about this account", "account review for <customer>" or "what should happen next on this account". Do not use for preparing a first call with a prospect, use discovery-call-prep instead; for scoring inbound leads against a rubric use lead-qualification-scorer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

kesslernity/awesome-copilot-agent-skills82026년 9월 19일 업데이트

Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via acc_act(runtime="outcome").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills72026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Use when the user asks to "build our social posting calendar", "set weekly slots and queue depth per channel", or "plan the evergreen recycle rotation"; produces the always-on brand calendar — pillar allocation with hero/hub/help balance and give:ask targets (all labeled Estimated starting heuristics to calibrate against own analytics, never scored rules), per-channel recurring slots with queue depth, a batching workflow, an evergreen recycle cycle with freshness re-checks, deliberate open slots for realtime/trend moments fed by trend-spotter go/skip verdicts, and first-comment/publish-order ops — cadence commitments filed to the channel registry, and no batch ships to the queue without a SHIP verdict from social-quality-auditor pre-publish mode. Not for repurposing an existing asset or the paid-amplification calendar — use content-amplifier. 社媒排期/内容日历/栏目配比/常青循环复用

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

unempyd/revenueos72026년 9월 14일 업데이트

Turns data/commitments.jsonl (flat list) into a who-owes-what-to-whom graph. Surfaces overdue chains and cross-PA dependencies that the flat list hides. Triggers: "what's overdue", "what did X promise", "commitment graph", "who's blocking whom".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

netanel-abergel/pa-skills62026년 5월 10일 업데이트

Personal App-in-Skill customer-support desk (help desk) that triages incoming support tickets from email, WhatsApp, web chat, contact forms, and WeChat, drafts KB-grounded replies, and proposes actions, then holds every send behind a human approval queue with a pre-send quality gate (support-qa) that outputs SHIP/FIX/BLOCK, plus SLA and CSAT tracking. Use when the user invokes $kelly-support or /kelly-support, mentions 客服 / 工单 / 支持台, a support desk, help desk, customer service, support tickets, ticket triage, a knowledge base or canned macros, SLA / first-response time, CSAT, escalations, or refund requests, wants incoming tickets triaged into a needs_review → approved → done pipeline, agent-drafted replies grounded in a knowledge base and reviewed before sending, refunds and commitments gated behind human approval, or breaching-SLA tickets surfaced. This is the OPERATOR desk (agent + human), distinct from a visitor-facing chat bubble.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

mr-kelly/skills52026년 10월 14일 업데이트

Route agent work through AccInt's MCP memory loop: retrieve prior outcomes, resolve frames, and close commitments with evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

phoroth/AGENTIC32026년 8월 8일 업데이트

Defensive counterpart to federated-harbor-redteam: closes the smells that red team opens against The Federated Harbor whitepaper. Federation-specific defenses for cross-harbor primitives — mechanization commitments, scope hedges, cross-paper dependency formalization, pre-emptive analogies (CT, Macaroons, atomic swaps), and defense-in-depth framing (refuses vs prices). Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-redteam. NOT for ad-hoc code review, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use whitehat-defense).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트