'evaluate' 검색 결과

Evaluate research papers and scientific claims by examining study design, statistics, bias, and evidence quality. Receive a structured critique of strengths, weaknesses, supported conclusions, and practical improvements, with uncertainty and limitations made explicit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing a paper's methods and conclusions
• Assessing evidence quality across studies
• Checking scientific claims in media reports

Evaluate whether a creator reaches the intended market using public profiles, comments, and available audience data. Get an evidence table, an audience fit rating, and a sponsorship recommendation with a stated confidence level.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing a creator's audience before sponsorship
• Comparing creators for a target market
• Checking audience geography and language

Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: "evaluate my repo", "is my app ready to deploy", "what does my app need to deploy", "what do I need before deploying", "does my app need", "can I ship this to Azure", "scan my repo for issues", "is this app deployable", "check if my app is ready for Azure", "do I need a Dockerfile", "what's blocking my deployment", "are there any blockers", "are my dependencies compatible", "does Azure support my framework", "what needs to change before deploying", "check my app configuration".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates where to spend limited capital — investment appraisal, hurdle rates, payback, and comparing proposals that are not alike. Use this to evaluate an investment or major purchase, compare competing funding requests, set a hurdle rate, decide between building and buying, or review whether past investments delivered what was claimed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: "evaluate my repo", "is my app ready to deploy", "what does my app need to deploy", "what do I need before deploying", "does my app need", "can I ship this to Azure", "scan my repo for issues", "is this app deployable", "check if my app is ready for Azure", "do I need a Dockerfile", "what's blocking my deployment", "are there any blockers", "are my dependencies compatible", "does Azure support my framework", "what needs to change before deploying", "check my app configuration".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable, and Results Reproduced — covering what security evaluators inspect, how to make attacks and defenses turnkey, and how to justify withheld artifacts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate YC batch companies for investment — scrapes the YC directory, researches each company and its founders (work history, LinkedIn, website), assesses founder-company fit, and exports to Google Sheets with priority rankings. Use when asked to evaluate YC companies, research a YC batch, screen startups, or do due diligence on YC companies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when exploring the ai-agent-skills catalog to find, compare, and evaluate skills before installing. Always use --fields to limit output size and --dry-run before committing to an install.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design, improve, and evaluate reusable agent skills with high-quality SKILL.md files, precise trigger descriptions, progressive disclosure, and testable behavior. This skill should be used when users ask to create a new skill, rewrite or review an existing skill, audit a skill collection such as `config/source/skills` for redundancy or overlap, improve skill trigger quality, organize skill references, or evaluate whether a skill should trigger and behave correctly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design or evaluate a brand visual identity system covering logo, color, typography, imagery direction, iconography, and motion principles. Use this skill whenever the user wants to design a logo, build a visual identity, define brand colors, choose brand typography, develop iconography, plan brand imagery, or evaluate an existing identity for cohesion. Triggers on logo design, brand identity, visual identity, brand mark, wordmark, monogram, color palette, brand colors, brand typography, type system, iconography, brand imagery, motion design, brand system, identity system. Also triggers when the user has a brand direction approved and now needs the visual artifacts that express it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate an AI workflow against representative cases and its permitted actions. Use for model, retrieval or agent evaluation; tests do not grant release authority.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates python code that evaluates SageMaker models. Supports two evaluation types: LLM-as-Judge and Custom Scorer. Use when the user says "evaluate my model", "run a benchmark", "test model performance", "how did my model perform", "compare models", or other similar requests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze website traffic, global rank, engagement metrics, and traffic sources for any domain. Use this skill to evaluate affiliate program websites, compare competitor traffic, assess advertiser strength, or understand where an audience comes from. Triggers on: "analyze traffic for [domain]", "how much traffic does [site] get", "compare traffic between [site A] and [site B]", "is [program] worth promoting based on traffic", "traffic analysis", "website analytics for [domain]", "where does [site] get traffic", "check if [advertiser] is legit", "evaluate [program] website health", "SimilarWeb analysis", "traffic sources for [domain]", "how popular is [site]", "website rank", "domain authority check", "compare affiliate program websites".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a leader evaluates a marketing TEAM MEMBER using data — a KPI scorecard by role, strengths with real examples, areas to improve stated as observable behavior, a 30 and 90 day development plan, and a 1-5 rating rubric. Trigger on 'performance review for my marketer', 'evaluate a team member', 'monthly 1:1 review', 'feedback for my content writer', 'development plan for an employee', 'is this person underperforming'. Also use when the user is unhappy with someone and cannot articulate why. Not for — evaluating a campaign rather than a person, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`; reviewing one piece of output, see `62-marketing-review-global`; scoring an external vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Iterative skill tuning via execute-evaluate-improve feedback loop. Uses maestro delegate Claude to execute skill, Agy to evaluate quality, and Agent to apply improvements. Iterates until quality threshold or max iterations. Triggers on "skill iter tune", "iterative skill tuning", "tune skill".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use Hugging Face Evaluate to load metrics, comparisons, and measurements; compute and combine results; run evaluator pipelines; create custom modules; troubleshoot optional dependencies, cache, Hub, and CLI workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates and sharpens content hooks using The Hook Stack™ framework. Use when scoring headlines, refining hooks for video/social/newsletter, or when asked to "evaluate this hook", "run through hook stack", or "score my headline".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate, compare, and manage vendor relationships. Trigger with "evaluate this vendor", "compare vendors", "vendor review", "should we renew", "RFP", or when the user is making procurement or vendor decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.