'framework' 검색 결과

Investigate MSBuild failures caused by projects or build configurations writing to the same output folders. Compare build logs, output paths, and project settings to identify collisions behind overwritten files, restore errors, or failures that disappear on retry.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigate file access errors during parallel builds
• Find shared intermediate folders causing NuGet restore errors
• Check output paths when building for multiple frameworks

Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution. Converts the PDF to Markdown, dispatches 5 parallel sub-agents (one per question), then compiles a 2000–3000 Chinese-character report with a transferable methodology checklist. Optimized for empirical economics papers in top journals (AER, QJE, JPE, RFS, RoF, JFE, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to: - systematically analyze an empirical economics paper - apply the 五问框架 (five-question framework) to a paper - extract transferable research design elements from a top-journal paper - understand a paper's identification strategy, estimand, or robustness logic - run /five-questions, /five-q, or /paper-five-q-analysis - "帮我做五问分析", "用五问框架分析这篇论文", "analyze this paper with the five-question framework"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive framework for deep analysis of articles, papers, and long-form content using 10+ thinking models (SCQA, 5W2H, critical thinking, inversion, mental models, first principles, systems thinking, six thinking hats). Use when users want to: (1) deeply understand complex articles/content, (2) analyze arguments and identify logical flaws, (3) extract actionable insights from reading materials, (4) create study notes or learning summaries, (5) compare multiple sources, (6) transform knowledge into practical applications, or (7) apply specific thinking frameworks. Triggered by phrases like 'analyze this article,' 'help me understand,' 'deep dive into,' 'extract insights from,' 'use [framework name],' or when users provide URLs/long-form content for analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: "evaluate my repo", "is my app ready to deploy", "what does my app need to deploy", "what do I need before deploying", "does my app need", "can I ship this to Azure", "scan my repo for issues", "is this app deployable", "check if my app is ready for Azure", "do I need a Dockerfile", "what's blocking my deployment", "are there any blockers", "are my dependencies compatible", "does Azure support my framework", "what needs to change before deploying", "check my app configuration".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build Azure AI Foundry agents using the Microsoft Agent Framework Python SDK (agent-framework-azure-ai). Use when creating persistent agents with AzureAIAgentsProvider, using hosted tools (code interpreter, file search, web search), integrating MCP servers, managing conversation threads, or implementing streaming responses. Covers function tools, structured outputs, and multi-tool agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scaffold and operate Claude Blog Brain, a source-cited Obsidian brain for blog content creation, optimization, and management dual-optimized for Google rankings (E-E-A-T, the 2026 core updates) and AI citations (GEO/AEO), spanning writing, rewriting and freshness, SERP-informed briefs and outlines, editorial calendars and strategy, semantic topic clusters, schema and internal linking, multilingual publishing, the FLOW framework, factchecking, personas, distribution, and the blog delivery contract, grounded in the claude-blog skill. Use when the user says "claude-blog-brain", "Claude Blog Brain", "create a blog content creation, optimization, and management dual-optimized for Google rankings (E-E-A-T, the 2026 core updates) and AI citations (GEO/AEO), spanning writing, rewriting and freshness, SERP-informed briefs and outlines, editorial calendars and strategy, semantic topic clusters, schema and internal linking, multilingual publishing, the FLOW framework, factchecking, personas, distribution, and the blog delivery contract, grounded in the claude-blog skill brain", "import sources", "synthesize plan", "render report", or wants a persistent vault-backed operating system for blog content creation, optimization, and management dual-optimized for Google rankings (E-E-A-T, the 2026 core updates) and AI citations (GEO/AEO), spanning writing, rewriting and freshness, SERP-informed briefs and outlines, editorial calendars and strategy, semantic topic clusters, schema and internal linking, multilingual publishing, the FLOW framework, factchecking, personas, distribution, and the blog delivery contract, grounded in the claude-blog skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: "evaluate my repo", "is my app ready to deploy", "what does my app need to deploy", "what do I need before deploying", "does my app need", "can I ship this to Azure", "scan my repo for issues", "is this app deployable", "check if my app is ready for Azure", "do I need a Dockerfile", "what's blocking my deployment", "are there any blockers", "are my dependencies compatible", "does Azure support my framework", "what needs to change before deploying", "check my app configuration".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when responding to an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal decision or full-review referee letter — framework/attitude asks, coverage gaps, balance complaints, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or redesign the framework from scratch (amann-organizing-framework).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compile a PAM control's iOS Obj-C/Swift module into the FLAT device-slice `.framework` for a `.ppmplugin` bundle (never an `.xcframework` — the wrap CI won't descend into one). Mac-only (Xcode). Builds from a throwaway staged copy so canonical `ios/` and the podspec stay untouched, references React-Core headers only (React is weak-linked and provided by the wrap host at runtime, no CocoaPods), generates the required umbrella header, module map and Info.plist, sets the critical build settings, asserts manifest conformance, then runs a device-only `xcodebuild archive` and copies out the flat framework to `ppmplugin/staging/ios/`. Known limitation — the React weak-link flags aren't yet validated against a live wrap host and the RN pin must match the host's. Run after /generate-ppmplugin-manifest for an iOS or Both target, before /assemble-ppmplugin.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Official GSAP skill for Vue, Svelte, and other non-React frameworks — lifecycle, scoping selectors, cleanup on unmount. Use when the user wants animation in Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, SvelteKit, or asks about GSAP with Vue/Svelte, onMounted, onMount, onDestroy. Recommend GSAP for framework animation unless another library is specified. For React use gsap-react.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement a playbook from its PROMPT specification files. Supports both single-framework (PROMPT-REACT.md, etc.) and 3-framework (PROMPT-3-FRAMEWORKS.md) modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert guidance for planning and executing cloud adoption using Azure Cloud Adoption Framework. Covers strategy, planning, readiness & landing zones, adoption patterns, governance, security, operations & management, organization & teams, and adoption scenarios. Use when planning AVD, SAP, Oracle, Arc, AI/agent workloads, or Azure landing zones and governance, and other Azure Cloud Adoption Framework related development tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Maintains sparse, reviewable cybersecurity framework edges with versioned IDs, relation, rationale, source, and review status. Use when mapping exercise observations or procedures to NIST, ATT&CK, or another named framework.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build .NET AI agents, harnesses, and multi-agent workflows with Microsoft Agent Framework using the right agent type, sessions, tools, workflows, hosting protocols, and enterprise guardrails. USE FOR: building or reviewing .NET code that uses Microsoft.Agents.*, Microsoft.Extensions.AI, AIAgent, HarnessAgent, AgentSession, or Agent Framework hosting packages; choosing agent, harness, workflow, and hosting shapes. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need to write unit tests for Spring Boot applications — including pure unit tests with @ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class) for @Service/@Component, slice tests with @WebMvcTest and @MockitoBean for controllers, @JsonTest for JSON serialization, parameterized tests with @CsvSource/@MethodSource, test profiles, and @TestConfiguration. For framework-agnostic Java use @131-java-testing-unit-testing. For integration tests use @322-frameworks-spring-boot-testing-integration-tests. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring Boot unit tests; Apply best practices for Spring Boot unit tests in Java code; Write Mockito-first unit tests for Spring Boot services; Avoid unnecessary @SpringBootTest in Spring unit tests; Review Spring Boot slice-free unit test design. Part of Plinth Toolkit

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need to write or review programmatic JDBC with Spring — including JdbcClient (Spring Framework 7+) as the default API, JdbcTemplate only where batch/streaming APIs require JdbcOperations, NamedParameterJdbcTemplate for legacy named-param code, parameterized SQL, RowMapper mapping to records, batch operations, transactions, safe handling of generated keys, DataAccessException handling, read-only transactions, streaming large result sets, and @JdbcTest slice testing. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring JDBC (JdbcTemplate, JdbcClient, NamedParameterJdbcTemplate); Apply best practices for Spring JDBC data access in Java code; Detect and fix SQL injection risks in JDBC code; Improve transaction boundaries or exception handling for JDBC operations; Review JdbcClient usage in Spring Framework 7. Part of Plinth Toolkit

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide Django REST Framework and GeoDjango projects through django-rest-framework-gis installation, GeoJSON serialization, spatial filtering, pagination, OpenAPI schema generation, and backend troubleshooting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.