286건 · 관련도순
Use when Code implementation and refactoring, architecturing or designing systems, process and workflow improvements, error handling and validation. Provide tehniquest to avoid over-engineering and apply iterative improvements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Transform photos, film stills, or new scene descriptions into the observed visual grammar of the 2026 animated film 《牛来》. Use when the user asks for 牛来风格、牛来正片风格、粗粝低模动物 3D、把真人画面改成牛来式动画，or requests iterative comparison against 《牛来》 references. Default to the rough film-3D mode; use the separate ink-poster mode only when the user explicitly asks for the movie poster look.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze branch commits and consolidate iterative modifications.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Max-3-cycle protocol for agent sub-tasks with WHY context and coordinator validation. Use when spawning sub-agents to complete scoped work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate a personal voice guide for X (Twitter) and/or LinkedIn by scanning a user's past posts and iteratively refining with sample-and-feedback loops. Produces a structured markdown voice guide that sibling skills (create-x-content, create-linkedin-content) consume to draft in-voice posts. Different from brand-voice-extractor, which analyses company blogs/landing pages — this skill is for personal social voice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Capture and review Agent Skill observations, and create, run, diagnose, or iteratively improve Skill evaluations (evals) with the skill-up CLI. Use when the user asks to record explicitly attributed Skill usage or feedback; review observations or user-supplied traces/transcripts; turn an approved observation into a regression case; evaluate, test, regress, verify, fix, improve, iterate, or evolve a Skill; add or strengthen eval cases; write eval.yaml/case.yaml; run skill-up run/validate/list-cases/report/import/init; or migrate from Anthropic evals.json. Plugin observation capture/review require either the Codex skill-up plugin or an observer-enabled DSH skill-up plugin. User-supplied external evidence can be reviewed without a plugin; evaluation remains multi-engine.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Configure Simulink models for Embedded Coder (ERT), Simulink Coder (GRT rapid-prototyping), or AUTOSAR code generation. Use when the user asks to generate embedded C or C++ code, run a full build of a model, produce a code generation report, configure a model for production/ECU deployment or rapid-prototyping code, target ARM or x86 hardware, apply MISRA C/C++ compliance (ERT/AUTOSAR only — Simulink Coder does not ship MISRA profiles), or set up GRT, ERT, AUTOSAR, or shared-library targets. Handles target selection, hardware mapping, model hierarchy propagation, and constraint introspection via the configure_for_codegen function. Do NOT use for GRT shared-library variants (grt_malloc.tlc), DDS, or ROS, or for iterative optimization workflows that measure baseline metrics, apply targeted changes, and re-measure to confirm improvement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Optimize MATLAB design files for GPU Coder to generate faster CUDA code. Iteratively profiles, rewrites, and benchmarks until performance targets are met or diagnostics are resolved. Use when asked to: optimize for GPU Coder, improve GPU codegen performance, profile generated GPU/CUDA code, profile GPU MEX, fix gpuPerformanceAnalyzer diagnostics, speed up GPU MEX, reduce GPU memory transfers, improve kernel parallelism, rewrite MATLAB for CUDA, or run gpuPerformanceAnalyzer.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
STRIDE + OWASP-based security audit with optional auto-fix. Scans code for vulnerabilities, categorizes by severity, and can iteratively fix findings using vc-autoresearch pattern.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates, optimizes, and iteratively refines agent prompts, system prompts, developer prompts, and reusable prompt templates. Use when asked to improve a prompt, optimize a system prompt, rewrite an agent prompt, tune prompt wording, make a prompt more reliable, port prompts between OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini, or build prompt evals.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create, synthesize, and iteratively improve agent skills following the Agent Skills specification. Use when asked to "create a skill", "write a skill", "synthesize sources into a skill", "improve a skill from positive/negative examples", "update a skill", or "maintain skill docs and registration". Handles source capture, precision passes, authoring, registration, and validation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Iterative measurement-driven improvement loop. Measure, profile, mutate, re-measure, commit. Works for performance, bundle size, complexity, test coverage — anything quantifiable. Use when the user wants to systematically improve a metric through repeated cycles of profiling and targeted changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create original, competition-ready commercial mediation problems and confidential packets with iterative validation. Use when a user provides a topic, industry, dispute sketch, or existing general-information packet and wants a public packet plus confidential packets for both sides—or one named side. Build a narrow but workable settlement corridor; verify factual and numerical consistency, information asymmetry, balance, originality, and commercial feasibility; and revise until deterministic and semantic exit criteria pass. Do not use merely to summarize an existing packet or to advise parties in a real dispute. Requires local file access; Python 3 is recommended for bundled deterministic checks, with disclosed manual fallbacks when unavailable.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user asks to "analyze my content", "learn my writing style", "research competitors", "find content angles", "improve my blog", "write like me", "embody my brand voice", or mentions content strategy, voice analysis, competitive research, or iterative content improvement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user wants an evidence-based research memo, literature review, market/policy/technical landscape, or a multi-source decision brief with citations, trade-offs, and a clear conclusion. Best for tasks that need synthesis across multiple external sources, iterative follow-up research, or a reusable written artifact. Do not use for quick factual lookups, single-source summaries, simple Q&A, summarizing one document the user already provided, plan-only requests where the user explicitly defers the actual research, or when the user wants a short answer with no need for cited evidence (a short but evidence-backed conclusion is still a brief memo, which this skill covers). Chinese trigger examples: "帮我调研", "深度研究", "综述报告", "技术选型分析", "竞品研究", "政策分析".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate concession-threshold guard that blocks acceptance on unresolved critical findings. Maintains a worklog and snapshots each iteration so revert is real, not symbolic. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 5 or when the user asks to "refine the draft", "iterate on the paper", or "run peer review on this paper".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute Python code locally with marketplace API access for 90%+ token savings on bulk operations. Activates when user requests bulk operations (10+ files), complex multi-step workflows, iterative processing, or mentions efficiency/performance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Autonomous multi-pass lyric refinement for tightening, cohesion, and album unity. Use after lyrics are written to polish a track or entire album through iterative passes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Long-running iterative cycle — one entry, seven modes (debug|improve|planex|review|security|defensive|ui). Shared archaeology/audit → fix → verify → generalize → discover → persist skeleton with mode-specific dimensions. User-invoked campaign entry; single-step fixes route via /maestro-next
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Iteratively refine a product spec by debating with multiple LLMs (GPT, Gemini, Grok, etc.) until all models agree. Use when user wants to write or refine a specification document using adversarial development.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.